• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2016 |OT10| Jill Stein Inflatable Love Doll

Status
Not open for further replies.
He really needs to get more blowback from this. He never spoke to the NAACP when they invited him. Even if it was rhetorical. At least today you can say he went to Mexico to try and appeal to them.

This man hasn't made a single effort to make inroads with black voters.

Well he's at 1% AA support. I don't think you can blowback into negative percentages.
 

studyguy

Member
The only inroads this is going to make is with white voters on the fence about his racist remarks, honestly this is as bad if not worse than that bit where he was talking to whites about black issues to me personally. At the very least you didn't have a president of a god damn country doing a spineless song and dance while he was talking down to them.

It's fucking galling to have the Mexican president call Trump's insults misinterpretations and I can't imagine the kind of play that's going to get with his electorate. Have a man call your people rapists and criminals only to also have those same comments waved away in the spirit of cooperation... fucking please.
 

Joeytj

Banned
Speaking about polls (again), this image from a couple of days ago., about where Hillary has the most campaign offices, prepared me for those Wisconsin numbers. I was surprised Wisconsin had so many offices.
CrIpO1rXEAAH53j.jpg


Until today with those new polls. But I didn't freak out because of them, as I remember that the Hillary campaign has it shit together and has never taken Wisconsin for granted, or other states for that matter.
 
The Wisconsin office makes sense in light of the polls, but not in the way a lot of people think. Like, there was a sharp decrease in the percentage of Democrats who said they would definitely vote. (Which is what Marquette uses for its LV screen). Because Trump didn't gain anything, it tells me that Hillary's support is there, you just have to turn it out. So, that's what her field and ground game is going to do.
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
If by governing you mean her victory will be seen as illigitimate?

Or do you mean the GOP won't work with her?

If it's the latter, I definitely agree but there's nothing we can do about it other than get people to vote in the House elections how they need to vote.

The GOP has simply become the "not going to allow governing to happen" party if they don't have control.

GOP won't work with her, and US population will reward it (again). They are the "not going to allow governing to happen" party because it keeps working in mid-terms.

https://twitter.com/BenjySarlin/status/770997978538582017

This is an awfully generous way of ignoring:

1. That Trump is getting crushed

2. That Trump is going to get demolished perhaps unlike anything in 2-3 generations

3. That we are still STILL recovering from the aftershocks of 9/11, Bush, Cheney, Iraq, Katrina, the housing collapse, the Great Recession and all of that before fucking racists melted down their entire party because a black man was elected president.

4. That wages are still stagnant and an entire generation of kids are up to their eyeballs in student loans they don't believe will ever be paid off.

So yeah, shit's bad even though the data looks good. The politics reflect the time. The tea party / white supremacy party does not exist in a vacuum and is not something to write off. We're seeing the last gasps of George Wallace and the first breaths of post globalized fascism. We have a long ways to go.

Yep. The First World (or more accurately, management / corporations in those countries) tried to globalize too fast and increase their labor pool (and wield massive leverage over labor) without thinking of the consequences of a notoriously tribal species (that had a massive rearrangement 50 years earlier due to WWII). Welp, welcome to the consequences.

We literally have Steve King of all people saying that he can work with Clinton.

This country is just plain racist. Lots of racists. Iknow quiteafew Republicans, and while they all hate Hillary, they all say that she's just shady or whatever. They call Obama an anti-American traitor. Sexism is also big here, but not to the degree that racism is. The GOP base views Hillary as a "bad American" while they see Obama as a Muslim infiltrator.

Also, I don't really see the difference between change coming through the Courts or through Congress. Both are government institutions with minimal input from the populace if we're being honest.

I think if Clinton wins with like 52+% of the vote, then it'll be OK. But if she wins the election 45/42/12/1 (Clinton / Trump / Johnson / Stein) - then the GOP is going to be able to make a faux-legitimate argument that the country did not want her to actually be president, and just chose her to stop Trump from being elected (and they will quickly disavow Trump). Then they run on an Anti-Clinton campaign in 2018 and take over the Senate & House (if they haven't already), and prep for 2020. I'm not sure the US can handle 4 more years of gridlock with the infrastructure falling apart the way it is.

Congress is still directly elected; gerrymandering or not. Leave it this way - imagine if W had replaced Ginsburg in 2007, and this election you have the Dems take the House and the Senate and the presidency, but be unable to pass anything because a conservative SCOTUS chosen 10 years ago is going to block anything remotely progressive. Progressives are all on board with SCOTUS having power because we've had the presidency for 8 years, and we are on pace to tilt it towards us for a good 20 years assuming Clinton wins. We want it tilted for us so that even if a clear majority of Americans want different policies than we do, it wouldn't matter.

Yeah, that's a freaking problem.
 
He visited an entirely different country before giving a speech to a group that wasn't essentially 99% white. And he's still not going to talk at the church, just sit there. Maybe they can read from Two Corinthians.
Or any of the parts of the Gospels where Jesus criticizes Trump-like people. Such as Luke 18:22-25.
 

Captain Pants

Killed by a goddamned Dredgeling
Getting into an 'all lives matter' argument with my brother. Fucking goddammit. I don't understand how we ended up so different.
 
Fox News poll:

Clinton +2, 41-39 RV, 48-42 H2H


Peter DoocyVerified account ‏@pdoocy 2m2 minutes ago
NEW @foxnewspoll
Four-way Presidential Vote Preference
Clinton 41
Trump 39
Johnson 9
Stein 4
(Aug 28-30, Registered Voters +/-3%)
 
I think if Clinton wins with like 52+% of the vote, then it'll be OK. But if she wins the election 45/42/12/1 (Clinton / Trump / Johnson / Stein) - then the GOP is going to be able to make a faux-legitimate argument that the country did not want her to actually be president, and just chose her to stop Trump from being elected (and they will quickly disavow Trump). Then they run on an Anti-Clinton campaign in 2018 and take over the Senate & House (if they haven't already), and prep for 2020. I'm not sure the US can handle 4 more years of gridlock with the infrastructure falling apart the way it is.
How the hell does Johnson break 10%? And Stein gets a whole 1?

Fox News poll:

Clinton +3

THIS IS FINE

H2H it is 48/42.
THIS IS ALSO FINE.

Wait a second...
Nah. The poll will be +6.
I am the All Seeing Milk.
 
Fox News poll:

Clinton +3, 42-39 RV

Blerg.

This race going from Hillary +7 to Hillary +3 is lame as shit.

The only thing that's happened in the last month was "the Clintons probably hire too many of their friends for their foundation that saves millions of lives via AIDS protection." That's enough to make Hillary drop 4 points?

edit: +6 is good though!

Hillary should probably point out that Gary Johnson hates poor people at this point because he's eating up a massive amount of Hillary support for someone that wants to end Social Security and the income tax.
 
Also worth noting this is the first time fox has done a four person poll as far as I can see.
Yeah, this is significant. If the Fox poll today is essentially still Clinton +6 then I think we should all celebrate tonight.

BTW: Which is usually more reliable? The head to head numbers, or the four way numbers? My suspicion is that third party voters usually just don't vote, anyway.
 
Clinton does well in the four-way ballot among blacks (+68 points), women (+15), and Hispanics (+19).

Trump is favored by whites (+13 points), men (+13), whites without a college degree (+23), and white evangelical Christians (+55).

Obama won Hispanics by over 50 points so, uhh, not great.

White Evangelicals supporting Trump is strong proof against religion tbh.
 
GOP won't work with her, and US population will reward it (again). They are the "not going to allow governing to happen" party because it keeps working in mid-terms.



Yep. The First World (or more accurately, management / corporations in those countries) tried to globalize too fast and increase their labor pool (and wield massive leverage over labor) without thinking of the consequences of a notoriously tribal species (that had a massive rearrangement 50 years earlier due to WWII). Welp, welcome to the consequences.



I think if Clinton wins with like 52+% of the vote, then it'll be OK. But if she wins the election 45/42/12/1 (Clinton / Trump / Johnson / Stein) - then the GOP is going to be able to make a faux-legitimate argument that the country did not want her to actually be president, and just chose her to stop Trump from being elected (and they will quickly disavow Trump). Then they run on an Anti-Clinton campaign in 2018 and take over the Senate & House (if they haven't already), and prep for 2020. I'm not sure the US can handle 4 more years of gridlock with the infrastructure falling apart the way it is.

Congress is still directly elected; gerrymandering or not. Leave it this way - imagine if W had replaced Ginsburg in 2007, and this election you have the Dems take the House and the Senate and the presidency, but be unable to pass anything because a conservative SCOTUS chosen 10 years ago is going to block anything remotely progressive. Progressives are all on board with SCOTUS having power because we've had the presidency for 8 years, and we are on pace to tilt it towards us for a good 20 years assuming Clinton wins. We want it tilted for us so that even if a clear majority of Americans want different policies than we do, it wouldn't matter.

Yeah, that's a freaking problem.


This isn't a Hillary problem, it is a Democrat problem. Obama won easily and the GOP still argued there was never any mandate. Hillary could win 60-40 and they will still obstruct. Fucking McConnell filibustered his own bill just a few years ago. What else do we need to know? They won't govern, period.

Her margin of victory (in terms of the Presidency) will not matter to the GOP at all.

As for SCOTUS, I agree I'd rather not have them (or rather the federal appellate system which is where most of the power lies) be as important as they're becoming in terms of power to force change...but it is a consequence of the GOP's bullshit.

Nothing is going to change until the GOP changes itself as a political party or a huge group within the party splinters off. I wish I knew how to cause this to happen ASAP (other than win and win big) but until it does, we're stuck.

it sucks. It really sucks. But that's the reality we live in. All we can do is fight as hard as possible to push what we see as progress. That's it.
 
Hillary crushed Bernie and Obama in Latino votes in both the 2008 and 2016 primaries so it seems confusing that she would do so much worse with Latino voters against "they're rapists" than Obama did against Rmoney.
 
Blerg.

This race going from Hillary +7 to Hillary +3 is lame as shit.

The only thing that's happened in the last month was "the Clintons probably hire too many of their friends for their foundation that saves millions of lives via AIDS protection." That's enough to make Hillary drop 4 points?

edit: +6 is good though!

Hillary should probably point out that Gary Johnson hates poor people at this point because he's eating up a massive amount of Hillary support for someone that wants to end Social Security and the income tax.

Johnson eating into Hillary's lead in places like California or hurting her in Mississippi doesn't matter. It only matters if it happens in swing states.

Too much focus on the national polling. This election is a bit unique in that I can totally see Hillary underperfoming in some reliably blue states (but not to Trump's benefit directly, to 3rd party) and overperforming in swing states.


Also, nothing really moved the election. All we're probably seeing is the convention bounce + Trump embarrassment shifting a bit in the response rates.


Trump can't clear 40 in a 4 way and he barely hits 42-44 in a 2 way. This is really bad for him. Where is he going to get more voters from?
 
Also worth noting this is the first time fox has done a four person poll as far as I can see.

Last month they did a 3 way, but, ya first time with Jill in there. It was 44/35/12.

Just a few random things I noticed. They have it as a 41/41 party breakdown. Last month, it was 42/36, Dem advantage. Also, weirdly, they no longer do individual breakdowns based on race. They did last month. This month it's just "non-white"
 
I mean, I don't think Stein is getting 4% and Johnson is going to get 9%. But I also think that clearly Clinton needs to do more to try to find out why these voters aren't telling pollsters they're going to vote for each other, especially if they were former Obama voters.
 

Loudninja

Member
I mean, I don't think Stein is getting 4% and Johnson is going to get 9%. But I also think that clearly Clinton needs to do more to try to find out why these voters aren't telling pollsters they're going to vote for each other, especially if they were former Obama voters.
Its a waste of time.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage

Last poll had "Other" getting 5 percent and Trump getting 39%, this poll has "Other" getting 1% and Trump getting 42%. Perhaps the "ashamed Trump voter" exists? I guess I'm not getting the 3% swing toward Trump here.

Also, I found it very interesting that in both cases, a majority of the public wants the opposite political party in control of Congress to keep the presidential power in check.
 

Joeytj

Banned
Blerg.

This race going from Hillary +7 to Hillary +3 is lame as shit.

The only thing that's happened in the last month was "the Clintons probably hire too many of their friends for their foundation that saves millions of lives via AIDS protection." That's enough to make Hillary drop 4 points?

edit: +6 is good though!

Hillary should probably point out that Gary Johnson hates poor people at this point because he's eating up a massive amount of Hillary support for someone that wants to end Social Security and the income tax.

Again, more proof Hillary loses support more than Trump gains. She seems to have a 3-5 point cushion against Trump, even with Johnson and Stein there.
 
What I don't get is why on their website they release margins for African Americans and Latino voters, but those numbers are not available in the actual release.

There is no universe in which she's only running 68 points ahead among African Americans and 19 point among Latinos.
 
With white evangelicals, Muslims, Mormons, and black protestants basically locked to one party, there's no benefit for the Democrats to be still trying for "respectability" or shit like that socially. Legalize weed, anyone who gets mad at you has already determined whom they're going to vote for already and nothing could change their views.

Where are you getting those numbers from, because they're not in the official release.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/08/31/fox-news-poll-trump-narrows-clintons-lead.html
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
Also, the poll clearly shows the Hillary email and "bad health" stories are non-starters. Over a majority of Americans think she used email for personal convenience instead of to hide something, and over 74% say the health thing is not worrisome at all.

60% of Americans say Trump is hiding stuff in his tax returns. Hillary has to hit him HARD on this, and I think her campaign has done a terrible job of it lately.
 
What I don't get is why on their website they release margins for African Americans and Latino voters, but those numbers are not available in the actual release.

There is no universe in which she's only running 68 points ahead among African Americans and 19 point among Latinos.

I just checked the last poll they released, too. They reported a number for Hispanics but did not put said information in the actual release. What the hell?
 

Captain Pants

Killed by a goddamned Dredgeling
Getting into an 'all lives matter' argument with my brother. Fucking goddammit. I don't understand how we ended up so different.

...and now he's saying that he couldn't speculate as to whether a black rapist would get a longer prison sentence than that Stanford kid. The dishonesty is astounding. This is why I don't talk to him about much of anything.
 
If Hillary Clinton is elected president, which would be better for the country?

A Democratic Congress to help Clinton get things done 43%
A Republican Congress to provide a check on Clinton’s power 52%

UGHHHHHH

This is disconcerting.


Also, the poll has Hillary losing white college educated and only +8 among under 35.

No race breakdown is weird.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom