Well this is a new one:
However, gunman appears to be of Indian descent.
It has been used to describe all indo-Europeans, the hypothetical Aryan people in Persia and India and the Nordic or Germanic peoples.[1] The term derives from the Aryan people, from Persia and India, who spoke a language similar to what has been found in Europe.
Eh I doubt she under much at all she does this stuff all the time.I'm so F-ing stressed for tonight. I can't even imagine the amount of pressure she's under. Unbelievable.
Eh I doubt she under much at all she does this stuff all the time.
I'm so F-ing stressed for tonight. I can't even imagine the amount of pressure she's under. Unbelievable.
New drinking game: if Hillary mentions any sort of meme, finish the rest of your bottle, finish off the rest of your liquor cabinet, DNR.
Yep.She's been here before and quite frankly was probably under more pressure in the Benghazi hearings.
She knows the importance of this. 90 minutes is a long time but I trust her to handle it far better than I do Trump.
Eh I doubt she under much at all she does this stuff all the time.
Eh I doubt she under much at all she does this stuff all the time.
Well this is a new one:
However, gunman appears to be of Indian descent.
Hitler considered Indians part of the Aryan race, so some Hindu extremist love Hitler for that idea.
The TargetSmart William & Mary Poll was conducted using a blended web/phone data collection approach. As weighted, 580 online interviews were conducted from September 15-20, 2016 among panelists from six leading online opt-in panel providers who were matched to the TargetSmart voter file. As weighted, 241 telephone interviews were conducted from September 20-22, 2016 to supplement the online sample, with telephone numbers for targeted populations being selected at random from the TargetSmart voter file. Results were weighted by TargetSmart Partisanship Score, TargetSmart 2016 General Election Turnout Score, age, gender, and media market to match the demographic characteristics of registered voters in the state. A second round of weighting was employed to derive a sub-sample of “Likely Voters.” Weights that resulted from the first round of weighting were multiplied by each respondent’s TargetSmart 2016 General Election Turnout score, as expressed as a value between 0.0 and 1.0. The TargetSmart 2016 General Election Turnout model is an ensemble method classifier model that was created to predict the likelihood that an individual will vote in the 2016 general election. No margins or sampling error are calculated for this survey, as this statistic is only applicable to fully randomly sampled surveys, which this survey is not due to its partial reliance on online interviews.
Huh
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/updates/
Ipsos drop for the win - but wtf at that PA poll. Has her winning OH, NC, FL, VA...but PA is down by one and Oregon is within one?
Basically. The quiet sexists will find something wrong with her no matter how she presents herself.The three worst things that Hillary can do at the debate:
1. Express too much emotion
2. Express too little emotion
3. Express an amount of emotion that sits perfectly even between too much and too little
Good night and may the Force be with you.
lol hillary already back up on the now-cast
TARGETSMARTTTTWilliam & Mary, OH
http://targetsmart.com/tswmp-ohio/
Hillary: 40.0
Trump: 37.3
Johnson: 8.3
Stein: 2.1
Seems like a decent methodology using the voter file:
Just to go over this past days
Hillary +4 nationally (YouGov)
Hillary +7 in Minnesota
Trump +2 nationally (A+ pollster)
Hillary + 1 in North Carolina (voter file poll)
Hillary +2 in Florida
Hillary +4 nationally (A+ pollster)
Hillary +2 in Pennsylvania (GOP pollster, landline)
Hillary + 5 nationally
Trump + 32 in West Virginia
Hillary + 3 in Ohio
What is Targetsmart? They sound like a bad poll. Like a marketing gimmick thing.
Huh
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/updates/
Ipsos drop for the win - but wtf at that PA poll. Has her winning OH, NC, FL, VA...but PA is down by one and Oregon is within one?
I don't completely understand nates model.
Look at PA
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/pennsylvania/
Literally Clinton has not been behind in a single poll in september. She's winning ever race. How is she only at 64% chance to win? Shouldn't it be like 90+? How could literally everypoll be wrong? What are the chances? like 1%?
don't look now
It's who William & Mary partnerning with.
So if we're keeping score, this morning started out with Selzer dropping a Trump +2 national poll and CNN dropping essentially tied polls in PA and CO.
Since then it's been
Clinton +5 nationally
Clinton +4 nationally
Clinton +2 in Florida
Clinton +2 in Ohio
Clinton +6 in Virginia
Clinton +1 in North Carolina
Clinton +2 in Pennsylvania (landline only)
Clinton losing the pulse of the nationdamn WV getting away from Hillary
Trump is at 44.7% in vote share. He has hit 44% 3 times in the top 20 weighted polls. He has been above 44% 4 times in total.
I really don't follow.
Allocate undecided and third-party voters +3.5-- +3.5-- +0.0--
Adjust for trend line -0.4-- +1.7-- -0.6--
So if we're keeping score, this morning started out with Selzer dropping a Trump +2 national poll and CNN dropping essentially tied polls in PA and CO.
Since then it's been
Clinton +5 nationally
Clinton +4 nationally
Clinton +2 in Florida
Clinton +2 in Ohio
Clinton +6 in Virginia
Clinton +1 in North Carolina
Clinton +2 in Pennsylvania (landline only)
Mostly good news - using this as a handy dandy monitor
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/updates/#now
Worst ones for Clinton are ties in Michigan and Wisconsin, Nevada +2 Trump, PA +2 Trump. That Ipsos drop is...something (I don't think they have been fully incorporated into the model as I don't see them on individual states pages)
Uneducated white people + Maine loves 3rd party candidatesI've got to say, I'm getting curious about Maine. Why does Trump consistently seem to be polling so well there?
I've got to say, I'm getting curious about Maine. Why does Trump consistently seem to be polling so well there?
Eh, she's still a human being that has worked a lot to get here.
Funny enough, the only picture I found in a quick search is from Breitbart.
Why did someone even spend money to poll WV?damn WV getting away from Hillary
Why did someone even spend money to poll WV?
I've got to say, I'm getting curious about Maine. Why does Trump consistently seem to be polling so well there?
@sahilkapur
Clinton comms director Jennifer Palmieri on what they expect from Trump tonight: "Boring but lying."
‏@sahilkapur
Clinton spox J. Palmieri: "We think he'll be disciplined. We think he'll try to get under her skin. We don't think he'll be successful."
I agree with this: