She's one of the worst, most ineffective people in Washington and apparently even worse in Florida. Murphy isn't her fault but if anyone is emblematic of the republican-lite empty suit culture that Murphy comes from it's her. It's 2016, that empty suit shit doesn't work as well for white guys anymore.
Stupid UPI poll...
Anyone notice how Rudy does the crazy eyes all the time now?
???Stupid UPI poll...
My father says the Clinton Boom only happened because of the long term payoff of Reaganomics.
Burgess! ❤️❤️❤️I'm honestly waiting for the SNL bit with Rudy as the Penguin.
Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg plans to retire when its time, the 83-year-old told NPR in an interview published Monday morning, leaving open the question of when exactly she might decide to leave the bench.
"And, when is it time? When I can't do the job full-steam, she said.
Take the hint.
Anyone notice how Rudy does the crazy eyes all the time now?
Vic Berger has made me completely obsessed with weird little body tics. My new favorite is how Rudy opens his eyes real wide every few seconds.
Probably a glitch unless they are starting to count down for something that is happening in early january that is not a primary.CNN has a new countdown on the screen
4,338 hours, 19 minutes, 08 seconds to coverage of the Wisconsin Primary
Awww, it just went away
Anyone notice how Rudy does the crazy eyes all the time now?
Had no idea Chertoff backed Hillary.
How long can the media keep saying "This is a CHANGE election" before it makes no sense? Castigate Clinton as establishment and Obama's 3rd term, but then she's leading nationally by 5 points.
Sure, Bernie and Trump were popular, but Clinton has essentially been dominant all year. I just don't get how those two concepts make sense together and why we keep pushing this "Change" narrative?
$$$$$
Who's going to challenge them?
Don't see where this is a change election. No downballot earthquakes.
Kander winning Missouri would be about the only thing that suggests a genuine change election to me, and that has more to do with Blunt being a lazy fuck than anything else.
Had no idea Chertoff backed Hillary.
There are a lot of conservative Dubya-era types backing Clinton. Not surprisingly the campaign doesn't put a lot of emphasis to their endorsements.
It is notable that both HW and Dubya's foreign policy apparatus are more or less all behind Clinton. Some of them might have big ideological bents but they all operated in the real world and know the kind of strong, nearly-unilateral power that the modern Presidency has on foreign affairs.
Twenty years ago Michael Chertoff was near the top of the Clintons' enemy list. He was the lead Republican counsel on the Senate Whitewater Committee, one of the first of many Congressional investigations into Hillary Clinton.
Clinton later cast the only vote in the Senate against him when he was nominated in 2001 to head the Justice Department's criminal division. She was also the lone no vote against Chertoff in 2003 when he was nominated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the third circuit.
All of this though was before the Republican Party nominated Donald Trump as its presidential candidate. This has shaken the party of Reagan. Chertoff, a life long Republican, will now be voting for the Democrat in November.
Over the weekend, Chertoff -- the former secretary of Homeland Security -- told me his decision came down to national security. "I realized we spent a huge amount of time in the '90s on issues that were much less important than what was brewing in terms of terrorism," he said. For Chertoff, Clinton "has good judgment and a strategic vision how to deal with the threats that face us."
Both Burr and Blunt are laaaaazy.
Trump said this recently about vet suicide.
https://twitter.com/anamariecox/status/782969673067421697
In fairness, Blunt seems to be trying harder than Burr to blunt Kander's rise, his (albeit piss-poor) response ad to Kander's gun ad being an example.This, it's clear in both races that the incumbents thought they were safe and have been getting completely out-hustled by scrappy challengers.
Charles Blow's op-ed in the NYT is titled "Donald Trump: Terroristic Man-Toddler"
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/03/o...rroristic-man-toddler.html?smid=tw-share&_r=1
This, it's clear in both races that the incumbents thought they were safe and have been getting completely out-hustled by scrappy challengers.
But then who's the oompa loompaI just realized that Trump is like a bad kid who got cut from Charlie and the Chocolate factory for being too exaggerated.
But then who's the oompa loompa
It's so exciting seeing the ususual suspects get excited for the end of the Clinton campaign on Wednesday!
October 4th, 2016
Vice Presidential Debate-pigeon
October 9th, 2016
2nd Presidential Debate-Paskil
Pigeon can post his tonight if he wants or in the morning. Paskill you can post yours Saturday night if you like.
October 19th, 2016
3rd Presidential Debate-Holmes
November 8th, 2016
United States General Election-Aaron Strife
Of course. This works both ways. Look at Corinne Brown and how hard she fought to keep the Florida Republican gerrymander. It gave her a much safer seat even though it was crippling the party as a whole.I get the feeling a good half of incumbents hate fundraising so much that they would rather risk losing their seat than doing the fundraising song and dance.
Also convinced that a large part of gerrymandering isn't just to entrench political power, but also to put long-time members of the state party in power in a position where they don't have to lift a finger (and hence not have to fundraise/campaign) to get re-elected.
October 4th, 2016
Vice Presidential Debate-pigeon
October 9th, 2016
2nd Presidential Debate-Paskil
Pigeon can post his tonight if he wants or in the morning. Paskill you can post yours Saturday night if you like.
October 19th, 2016
3rd Presidential Debate-Holmes
November 8th, 2016
United States General Election-Aaron Strife
noiiice!Sounds familiar.
Sounds familiar.
Sounds familiar.