banefirelord
Banned
I chuckled.
I chuckled.
I'm just trying to reconcile how public polling always has Hillaremail leading among those who early vote while the party data looks sort of mediocre. I guess it could be NPA/unaffiliated.
Would I be correct in assuming that taking the Senate is necessary for Hillary to get more than one term?
My gut feeling hot take of the moment is that if Dems don't win the Senate, Hillary won't win re-election. 2018 is all but guaranteed to give both houses of Congress to the GOP. These next two years are Hillary's only chance to get a bare minimum of stuff done through the Senate. If she doesn't have that, she'll be viewed as a do-nothing or ineffectual president, rather than the victim of GOP obstruction and gridlock (which would be true, but, if 2014 and potentially this year are any indication, doesn't actually resonate with enough voters).
Eh... If I saw them from afar I'd assume they were for Hillary tbh.
My gut feeling hot take of the moment is that if Dems don't win the Senate, Hillary won't win re-election. 2018 is all but guaranteed to give both houses of Congress to the GOP. These next two years are Hillary's only chance to get a bare minimum of stuff done through the Senate. If she doesn't have that, she'll be viewed as a do-nothing or ineffectual president, rather than the victim of GOP obstruction and gridlock (which would be true, but, if 2014 and potentially this year are any indication, doesn't actually resonate with enough voters).
Citizens united too...It's also necessary because we will need a liberal SCOTUS to strike down voter suppression.
And the redistricing caseIt's also necessary because we will need a liberal SCOTUS to strike down voter suppression.
Yeah I'm banning everyone! Shinra pull the lever!!
Would I be correct in assuming that taking the Senate is necessary for Hillary to get more than one term?
They're not?
Kind of a bad costume if that's the case. I thought they were making fun of the scandal.
Yeah I'm banning everyone! Shinra pull the lever!!
They have said they would and considering they've already blocked Obama for a record amount of time, I see no reason to not take those threats seriously.
If doing that didn't backfire on them then it's basically a sign of approval from voters. So why not continue doing it? Only four years of blockage and they might get a conservative court for another 40.
how what why?
did obama ever have a democratic senate?
he certainly didn't have one for the last four years and he we are with a democratic president
Y'all are a damn mess. Bless your hearts.
Which blue states does the GOP turn red to hit 270?
how what why?
did obama ever have a democratic senate?
he certainly didn't have one for the last four years and he we are with a democratic president
Would I be correct in assuming that taking the Senate is necessary for Hillary to get more than one term?
I have no idea. And it largely depends on the kind of nominee the GOP ends up with in 2020. But my instinct is that a fourth consecutive White House term for one party would be such a long shot all its own that I'm more compelled to think about variables that will break against Hillary rather than which demographic blocs will be firmly in Hillary's camp to mathematically deny the GOP again.
Obama had a Dem senate after each of his elections.
Obama had a Dem Senate for six years.
Came in with one in 2009, they lost the majority in the 2014 elections.
I have no idea. And it largely depends on the kind of nominee the GOP ends up with in 2020. But my instinct is that a fourth consecutive White House term for one party would be such a long shot all its own that I'm more compelled to think about variables that will break against Hillary rather than which demographic blocs will be firmly in Hillary's camp to mathematically deny the GOP again.
There are too many safe blue states. They'd have to turn Wisconsin or something, but even then, that's assuming the Democrats don't keep Nevada and other current toss up or slightly lean Republican states don't move more blue.
The country being so polarized is going to end up hurting the GOP in the presidency, because there are enough semi-safe blue states to equal 270. To the point where they'd need to convince Democrats to be on board with them, and that's not likely to happen anymore.
If the GOP has a good nominee and Hillary's Presidency sucks/is mediocre, that can easily happen. I think there's a fair chance of a recession at some point before 2020 too.
All those independent voters have gnat-brains and will forget this election by then.
Unreliable as they were, they also passed healthcare reform and Dodd-Frank among other things."Dem" Senate. Joe Lieberman and the Blue Dogs weren't exactly reliable.
I have no idea. And it largely depends on the kind of nominee the GOP ends up with in 2020. But my instinct is that a fourth consecutive White House term for one party would be such a long shot all its own that I'm more compelled to think about variables that will break against Hillary rather than which demographic blocs will be firmly in Hillary's camp to mathematically deny the GOP again.
Obama had a Dem senate after each of his elections.
edit: wait! How did I forget the Dems actually kept the Senate in 2010? Sure didn't feel like it :lol
Smith guy said Hispanic vote is way way up.So what is going on in Florida
Low minority vote, but higher than 2012?
Scott Brown 2012!
Simple, Russia wants Trump to win.
We just can't seem to get the same % of African-American vote in NC that we got in 2012 in early voting. We're not even close right now.
Part of this is due to the early voting changes but if that was the case then the two African-American lines would be converging, and not parallel.
Need to blanket the state in volunteers and mobilize these voters.
Smith guy said Hispanic vote is way way up.
We just can't seem to get the same % of African-American vote in NC that we got in 2012 in early voting. We're not even close right now.
Part of this is due to the early voting changes but if that was the case then the two African-American lines would be converging, and not parallel.
Need to blanket the state in volunteers and mobilize these voters.
We just can't seem to get the same % of African-American vote in NC that we got in 2012 in early voting. We're not even close right now.
Part of this is due to the early voting changes but if that was the case then the two African-American lines would be converging, and not parallel.
Need to blanket the state in volunteers and mobilize these voters.
African American turnout looks down across the board. This could be an EV phenomenon but I doubt it and it's very upsetting.
I had a strong feeling this would end up happening but i wasn't quite sure since it wasn't being reflected in the polls. It sucks but the crime bill and superpredator stuff was effective at making young black voters apathetic about this election.African American turnout looks down across the board. This could be an EV phenomenon but I doubt it and it's very upsetting.
Looks like O'Keefe may have broken wiretapping laws with some of the videos he posted recently.
https://thinkprogress.org/james-okeefe-wiretapping-video-9c056e1a6339#.z815v7ohf
African American turnout looks down across the board. This could be an EV phenomenon but I doubt it and it's very upsetting.
Looks like O'Keefe may have broken wiretapping laws with some of the videos he posted recently.
https://thinkprogress.org/james-okeefe-wiretapping-video-9c056e1a6339#.z815v7ohf
We're taking over
Looks like O'Keefe may have broken wiretapping laws with some of the videos he posted recently.
https://thinkprogress.org/james-okeefe-wiretapping-video-9c056e1a6339#.z815v7ohf
I had a strong feeling this would end up happening but i wasn't quite sure since it wasn't being reflected in the polls. It sucks but the crime bill and superpredator stuff was effective at making young black voters apathetic about this election.