There was a multiple point polling swing from the Comey announcements
Sexism and racism are pretty rampant, and Clinton wasn't the best candidate, but Bernie is wrong here. The future of the Democratic party is an intersectional coalition.
What are your reasons for why the Democrats lost?
There was a multiple point polling swing from the Comey announcements
Sexism and racism are pretty rampant, and Clinton wasn't the best candidate, but Bernie is wrong here. The future of the Democratic party is an intersectional coalition.
I'm applying to Econ Ph.D. programs as of now and I could use suggestions on schools if anyone has any advice... I'm interested in Labor, Development, Growth, Public, Political Economy, and Environmental in that order.
168 Quant GRE, 3.995 GPA (A- in Ph.D. level Time series), double major in mathematics and economics (with three classes in analysis, two in mathematical statistics, and two in stochastic processes). Doing math research as of now. Went to a university that was good at math and not good at Econ (to put it lightly)
Current school list...
LOL NO Tier:
1. Princeton
2. Yale
3. Berkeley
Maybe... Tier:
4. Michigan
5. UCLA
6. Brown
Hopefully Tier:
7. Texas
8. Rochester
9. MSU
10. Virginia
What are some good schools ranked in the 40s or 50s that I should apply to just in case? If anyone has any suggestions, that would be cool. No problem if you don't.
Where did he say to appeal to WWC by taking up racist or sexist rhetoric?
There was a multiple point polling swing from the Comey announcements
Sexism and racism are pretty rampant, and Clinton wasn't the best candidate, but Bernie is wrong here. The future of the Democratic party is an intersectional coalition.
It's funny he risks crafting a Democratic party that sounds and offers virtually the same as the New Trump Republican party only Trump will offer minorities to scapegoat and this Dem Party will offer raising your taxes...
Just go to Rochester.
Just do it.
Trust me, you'll like it here.
Hope you like snow!
This is a damn good way of putting it, mind if I steal it?
It's clearly a big part of what made voters go Trump. You aren't getting those voters back, so you need to get younger people and a more diverse coalition. You do that by registering more people and fighting voter ID laws
Turnout was up in the states that mattered. Exit polls in the Rust Belt states indicate that Trump won union voters, a group that Obama won. I haven't seen exit polls that stated that e-mails was a reason for switching votes, but I have seen ones where the reasons were economic.Voter suppression, FBI announcements, and Russian propaganda arm
It's really scary that our Democracy is that vulnerable to these things
Luckily for me, thanks to climate change, it will never snow in Rochester by the end of my fifth year.
The world will be on fire, but I won't have to deal with snow. Thanks Trump and McConnell.
He was talking about sending abortion rights back to the states and when Leslie Stahl asked him how he would feel about women in some states not being allowed access to it he basically shrugged and said they'd have to move to another state. Whatever tax break I get is going to pro-choice funds.
So basically you're back to being without health insurance if you can't afford the high risk pool.Part of the problem with high risk pools were they woild be waitlisted for like 9 months. It's been a while but I think the CA one had a 6 month exclusion on top of that. On top of that premiums in the 600-800 a month range, iirc.
They were a complete non option for me when I had to look into it.
There was a multiple point polling swing from the Comey announcements
Sexism and racism are pretty rampant, and Clinton wasn't the best candidate, but Bernie is wrong here. The future of the Democratic party is an intersectional coalition.
He was talking about sending abortion rights back to the states and when Leslie Stahl asked him how he would feel about women in some states not being allowed access to it he basically shrugged and said they'd have to move to another state. Whatever tax break I get is going to pro-choice funds.
It's funny you know going forward... the left is going to need rich charity folk to step up and essentially fill the gap of the government failing them....
Like billionaires gonna need to fund Planned Parenthood.
What do you think Trump will replace the bust of MLK in the Oval Office with
If the rest of the world was a desert, it would still find a way to snow in Rochester
Snow starts later than it used to, 20 years ago (used to start in November, sometimes October, now it barely makes it to Christmas, sometimes not until mid January). But when it hits, it hits with a fury. It still ends around the same time, strangely enough. Usually petering out by April if we're lucky (snow in May has happened)
Yup. Clinton and the way many perceived her weren't good for this kind of voter. But the margins were small enough that better messaging and more effort to reach them very well could have made the difference.Turnout was up in the states that mattered. Exit polls in the Rust Belt states indicate that Trump won union voters, a group that Obama won. I haven't seen exit polls that stated that e-mails was a reason for switching votes, but I have seen ones where the reasons were economic.
Who said we had to get em all back? I'm sure plenty didn't vote because of racism and sexism (tho they are willing to vote for someone that condones it) and I think a few things tailored their way without resorting to that rhetoric is entirely possible.
Turnout was up in the states that mattered. Exit polls in the Rust Belt states indicate that Trump won union voters, a group that Obama won. I haven't seen exit polls that stated that e-mails was a reason for switching votes, but I have seen ones where the reasons were economic.
Bernie Sanders and his philosophy are dangerous to the functioning of a political party in our current climate. Money in politics is bad, EVERYONE knows this. Not even Democrats want to play this game. But I don't know how he expects Democrats to raise the money to win elections without wealthy donors. And no, not every candidate at every level of government is going to be able to effectively crowdfund like he did.
I mean, we all just finished bedwetting over how many congressional seats the Democrats have lost in the last 8 years, but lets not forget that a HUGE reason was for that was the self-imposed restrictions of campaign finance that the Democrats instituted during the Obama administration. We chose the high road and went broke because of it. And this is EXACTLY what Bernie wants us to do now? NOW? Fuck. All. The. Way. Off.
I truly believe that a huge part of the reason establishment Democrats rushed to endorse Keith Ellison was not just because he's qualified for the job, but to drown out Bernie Sanders.
God, that man cannot be allowed to take over the party.
Bolded is the key, these voters don't care about civil rights for marginalized people. They aren't a reliable voter block, what are we gonna do lie about getting rid of trade deals?
YOU CAN DO BOTH. That's EXACTLY what he was arguing for the entire time, and he won working class voters in the primary.
We lost with the intersectional candidate regardless.
Again he said too much focus was on wealthy not that we should have a knee jerk reaction and go the complete opposite way.
No nuance for people here and Bernie's tweets.
A potential candidate like Stooge wants to run but is turned away because he was a ex-Goldman VP and his "potential ties" to wealthy people.
Folks in OT are clamoring for Michael fucking Moore to lead a new left wing Democratic party movement.
Christ.
Why do you automatically assume "working class families"="white working class families"?
He's not really wrong. I'm not a Sanders fan but we just saw a democrat candidate lose because she couldn't hold three "working class" blue states.
I remember when Octobers were cold (okay, "chilly") down here in Louisiana.
I miss cold Halloweens..
Again he said too much focus was on wealthy not that we should have a knee jerk reaction and go the complete opposite way.
No nuance for people here and Bernie's tweets.
As someone who has worked in union environments on the management side, yes, union workers can be very racist. They are also anti-free trade. If you have a candidate (Trump) who can combine the two, you have a win.
Remember, recent Republican candidates (Romney, McCain, Bush) were very pro-trade. Trump is the first to take a sharp stand against treaties like NAFTA. In previous years, Democrats were the ones who were more anti-free trade agreements.
Only way to win these votes is to become more isolationist. That's going to cost you minority votes.
He wants to run in Texas near San Antonio right? A Dem there is different than a rural Texas Dem.
And I don't know how having a debate over the nuance of a tweet is ignoring the little things.
Decreasing focus on the wealthy does not mean no focus on the wealthy. Hillary had a calendar with fundraisers in California, New York and Martha's Vineyard over a 45 day period in August and September and 0 visits to non-urban areas of Rust Belt states--she visited only Philadelphia, Cincinnati and Cleveland from August 16 to September 30, while visiting Martha's Vineyard multiple times along with visits to the Hamptons and Beverly Hills.Bernie Sanders and his philosophy are dangerous to the functioning of a political party in our current climate. Money in politics is bad, EVERYONE knows this. Not even Democrats want to play this game. But I don't know how he expects Democrats to raise the money to win elections without wealthy donors. And no, not every candidate at every level of government is going to be able to effectively crowdfund like he did.
I mean, we all just finished bedwetting over how many congressional seats the Democrats have lost in the last 8 years, but lets not forget that a HUGE reason for that was the self-imposed restrictions on campaign financing that the Democrats instituted during the Obama administration. We chose the high road and went broke because of it. And this is EXACTLY what Bernie wants us to do now? NOW? Fuck. All. The. Way. Off.
I truly believe that a huge part of the reason establishment Democrats rushed to endorse Keith Ellison was not just because he's qualified for the job, but to drown out Bernie Sanders.
God, that man cannot be allowed to take over the party.
I mean, wtf does he think we're raising that money for? What pool does he think he drew from when he needed funding for his Senate races?
Minorities don't give a fuck about free trade.
You bring up a good point though. It's interesting that Trump won basically by moving to the left of Democrats on trade. The election was not exactly a resounding endorsement of conservative policy. No one is reporting it that way though.
The tax cut trickledown fairy will take care of everything.Man what the hell is Ryan DOING.
I want to know how he's going to replace Obamacare and make it more affordable or so he says while still covering pre existing conditions. I'd LOVE to know.
Folks in OT are clamoring for Michael fucking Moore to lead a new left wing Democratic party movement.
Christ.
Folks in OT are clamoring for Michael fucking Moore to lead a new left wing Democratic party movement.
Christ.
“Have they drifted from their original goal, Mike? I know you’re a big fan of Julian Assange—he was on our show recently. I feel like he’s drifted,” Maher told Moore. “Now, it’s a lot of personal shit. At the beginning, it was about ‘we’re exposing what’s going on at Guantanamo Bay, and the Iraq War, and letters of Scientology,’ and last year their big thing was the Sony hack! Let’s find out what studio executives think of Adam Sandler! I really feel like he’s lost his way a little, and he hates Hillary.”
Moore, who is currently promoting his pro-Hillary documentary Michael Moore in TrumpLand, seemed to concur, painting Assange as an anarchist hell-bent on disrupting the U.S. government.
“I think WikiLeaks and I think Assange, they’re essentially anarchists and they know, just like a lot of people voting for Trump know, that he’s their human Molotov cocktail and they want to blow up the system,” said Moore. “It’s an anarchic move.”
Decreasing focus on the wealthy does not mean no focus on the wealthy. Hillary had a calendar with fundraisers in California, New York and Martha's Vineyard over a 45 day period in August and September and 0 visits to non-urban areas of Rust Belt states--she visited only Philadelphia, Cincinnati and Cleveland from August 16 to September 30, while visiting Martha's Vineyard multiple times along with visits to the Hamptons and Beverly Hills.
I wonder how long the media will continue to wash Trump's balls.