Yeah, Bill Clinton was my first vote. Imagine how geeked I was when Louisiana went blue. My uncles were extra-bitter a few weeks later at Thanksgiving; they largely blamed women. In a way, it was hysterical.
Yes.Will there be a Super Tuesday thread?
the next debate is Fox/Megyn Kelly, she's saving up those footage traps.
Will there be a Super Tuesday thread?
When rubio is the nom, u will be so sad
He has an easy narrative in that Rubio / Fox / Rush story. "They are in bed with Rubio and will do anything to discredit me"I don't mind Trump skipping Fox debates as long as he mounts a pre-emptive fight beforehand like he did for the one he skipped.
He's going to get murdered by Fox - a last ditch effort by them to sink him. He knows this very well.
Even if, by some bullshit, that turns out to be the case my other bets would bring me to better than break even.
how much you make by trump being nominee?
About $1200.how much you make by trump being nominee?
Gotta subtract the initial investment when calculating profit.Each share resolves to $1 upon winning, so he's going to make $1500 or so.
must have bought low last summer?
Man rewatching highlights of Trump at the last debate he's such a beatable candidate by anyone halfway competent in my opinion.
I mean his defence for hiring foreign seasonal workers was he couldn't find American workers who wanted to work his Florida country club. Way to walk into a Democratic talking point.
Are you hate playing COD?I'm a bad gay in that I never watch award shows. No interest at all.
"Who is Jeb Bush? I'm John Ellis Bush."
Where's the endorsement, Jeb?
Are you hate playing COD?
The contract that was to save them binds them to an anchor.
It needs to trickle down first..
Where's the endorsement, Jeb?
I would be shocked if it weren't .. Which is why I considered voting for the God King in the primary.No. I'm randomly going through Twitter because of the #I'mWithHer thing.
Supposedly there was a straw poll in Alexandria, VA tonight, Hillary won 91 to 17. So....VA is in the bank?
It started out that way.Hillary thread is getting nasty
I don't mind Trump skipping Fox debates as long as he mounts a pre-emptive fight beforehand like he did for the one he skipped. The few points that he loses (from not attending - "weak", "scared") in that theoretical fight are not big enough to sway any of the states voting in a major way as to swing momentum in the election.
He's going to get murdered by Fox - a last ditch effort by them to sink him. He knows this very well - extremely well. He would rather prefer CNN, CBS, ABC etc...
I don't mind it. The greater the rift between him and Fox, the greater the rift between his followers and Fox.
Yep. Not worth it.
Hillary thread is getting nasty
@NateSilver538
Any good books on how European fascists were covered by the press as they rose to power in the 1930s? Asking for a friend.
Hillary thread is getting nasty
I know it's like only a day away but I hope Hillary put a lot of resources in trying to win Massachusetts. Bernie losing that would be the biggest blow to his campaign. Even if he managed to win Minnesota or somethingMan, I have a feeling that Hilldawg will sweep Tuesday, ya'll.
Like, only losing Vermont sweep.
The millionaires and billionaireswho is going to fund rubio through June for a quixotic brokered convention?
Hillary thread is getting nasty
The millionaires and billionaires
How can polls be real if our votes aren't real?NBC's Chuck Todd asks Donald Trump to defend the fact that he retweeted a quote from Italian World War Two-era dictator Benito Mussolini.
"It is better to live one day as a lion than 100 years as a sheep," Mussolini, is known to have said.
"It's a very good quote," said Trump. "It's a very interesting quote, and I know it. I saw it... What difference does it make whether it's Mussolini or somebody else? It's certainly a very interesting quote."
Chuck Todd seems perplexed. "Do you want to be associated with a fascist?"
"No," Trump said. "I want to be associated with interesting quotes."
Hillary thread is getting nasty
"Both parties are the same!"
So I'm not the only one picking up on this, yeah? But most people are smart enough to avoid actually saying that because it's been so thoroughly debunked many times over. So instead we have longwinded, roundabout posts that essentially boil down to the same sentiment but without actually stating it.
How can polls be real if our votes aren't real?
How can polls be real if our votes aren't real?
Let's say Trump sweeps the southern states, Alaska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, and comes in second in Texas; dunno about MA, ND, and the other states. The NY Times article from a few days ago said Rubio's campaign is trying to get the Romney endorsement before the Idaho and Michigan contests, which are on March 8th. Trump is leading by a large margin in Michigan, and while I haven't seen an Idaho poll I wouldn't be stunned if he's ahead there as well. But...let's assume Trump wins Michigan win and let's give Idaho to Rubio. Thus souring the "breaking news" worth of Romney's endorsement.
And then Trump wins Florida on March 15th. At that point he could certainly argue he is the nominee and threaten to skip debates. I don't think it's a good idea but at the same time if Rubio cannot win his own state (whereas Cruz manages to win his), I just don't see how much longer Rubio can stick it out. He's going to have a lot of money soon, but how much will be non-PAC money?
I agree with Rubio (and Cruz/Kasich) that a brokered convention is the goal. But Trump is winning so big he can outright clinch this thing...