FixedThe dark theme is the Establishment theme.
Yourgoddamnright.gifThis is why tOSU GAF is superior to all y'all.
The dark theme is the correct theme.
So we should ignore an actual data point for your anecdote. Gotcha.
your entire argument is "I feel like it's better organized cuz I got them feels."
I'm sorry if we're not going to take you seriously. Your argumentt sounds like a GOP tax plan.
Fuck off with that
If someone with Photoshop can cut it I'd update it. I found it on Google.Oh no, what did I start. I just wanted a prettier avatar for NYCMetsFan.
I don't think it's fair to ask Bernie to apologize to Sandy Hook victims, but that was a very poor response on his part.
TWINS
Yeah, exactly my view. Good opportunity for him to take the high road there and he blew it.
But i'm unfortable with the way Hillary has attacked Sanders on guns, it comes across way too much as an appeal to emotion, when she rarely uses that tactic.
KELLY: [Y]ou dont favor a rape or an incest exception to abortion and for people like me, this may be a problem in getting behind President Ted Cruz. They think you may be too far right on social issues.
CRUZ: Well, listen, lets talk you know, when it comes to rape, Ive spent a lot of years in law enforcement. I was the solicitor general in the state of Texas and I have handled cases with horrific cases of rape, of people who committed child rape, people I went before the U.S. Supreme Court and argued in defense of state laws imposing capital punishment for the very worst child rapists. And when it comes to rape, rape is a horrific crime against the humanity of a person and needs to be punished and punished severely but at the same time, as horrible as that crime is, I dont believe its the childs fault. And we weep at the crime. We want to do everything we can to prevent the crime on the front end and to punish the criminal, but I dont believe it makes sense to blame the child.
Won't someone think of the rapists' child...?
Wow. Why is he even being asked to apologize?
Honestly I'll defend him. The question is ludicrous and he posits a similar analogy for Hillary. That being said...you don't want to say that shit out loud, Sanders. Let someone on Reddit say that and get upvoted 2000 times.
Yea, that's going to go over really well in a state that takes it's gun control very seriously.
In late 1999, the Clinton administration announced it would join the efforts: The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) vowed to pursue a lawsuit against the firearms industry, on behalf of public housing authorities who spent billions annually trying to protect residents from gun violence.
The approach showed early dividends. In March 2000, Smith & Wesson agreed to a settlement that included a promise that the company would provide safety locking devices, invest in smart gun technology to limit use to the proper owner, limit magazine capacity for its new firearms, cut off dealers and distributors with a history of selling to criminals, and prevent authorized dealers from selling at gun shows where any arm sales are permitted without background checks.
Actually straw poll or whatever. I'm curious on whether and where people would fall on repealing the second amendment. Setting aside the impossibility.
Isn't it like political suicide to run on repealing the gun laws in NYC or even the rural areas?
Won't someone think of the rapists' child...?
100% support repealing it. Or banning the sale of bullets. I loathe guns.Actually straw poll or whatever. I'm curious on whether and where people would fall on repealing the second amendment. Setting aside the impossibility.
Won't someone think of the rapists' child...?
Won't someone think of the rapists' child...?
Actually straw poll or whatever. I'm curious on whether and where people would fall on repealing the second amendment. Setting aside the impossibility.
Actually straw poll or whatever. I'm curious on whether and where people would fall on repealing the second amendment. Setting aside the impossibility.
I don't take seriously the simple counter-argument that organization is only measured by numbers without a lick of care for context or any other factor there of;....which is the only counter-argument worth a cent thrown around. In the end, I just see it as another opinion - which I respect and pretty much weight in in my rationale but clearly didn't play enough to sway a different conclusion.
What does suing the gun manufacturers even solve? I just don't understand this guns things.
I think we can make the argument more simple. No one is saying gun makers should be sued for every gun attack. But, the idea of essentially blanket immunity for an entire industry is legally problematic. A lot of theses cases never get to trial, because they're immediately dismissed. That's the stuff we should all take issue with, in my opinion.What does suing the gun manufacturers even solve? I just don't understand this guns things.
Repeal the shit out of it.Actually straw poll or whatever. I'm curious on whether and where people would fall on repealing the second amendment. Setting aside the impossibility.