• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2016 |OT4| Tyler New Chief Exit Pollster at CNN

Status
Not open for further replies.
Emerson Polling

Connecticut

Clinton 49
Sanders 43
Me right now

giphy.gif
 
Yeah, it's so great. Hold on, why am I supposed to be happy about that? Hillary has a 49% "will never vote for her" rating as opposed to Bernie's 37%. It's like we're dead set on making this race as difficult for us as possible.

That's a single poll taken in April for an election that will be in November. Those numbers aren't set in stone. Some people who say they won't vote for Clinton will change their minds in November when the heat of the primary is in the past and the reality that the alternative is Trump or Cruz sets in.

By the same token Sanders will benefit from the comparison to Trump and Cruz, but he'll also be hurt by the barrage of attacks he'll be facing in the general election. Right now he's benefiting from being relatively unknown in these numbers. People who say they'll vote for him now may not be so willing after ads attacking him for tax increases, socialism, Fidel Castro, bread lines, not believing in charity, etc. Would that hurt him enough to cost him the election given that he'd be facing Trump or Cruz? I don't know, but we can't just take these numbers at face value.

As always, the problem with the argument that Sanders is more electable because of polling numbers is that general election polls taken this far out don't really have predictive value.
 

NeoXChaos

Member
People do realize if they make the supers vote with the winner of the state you are effectively creating a WTA bonus which would further screw your candidate who is losing.
 

Holmes

Member
People do realize if they make the supers vote with the winner of the state you are effectively creating a WTA bonus which would further screw your candidate who is losing.
Yeah, I actually agree with DWS here (!) that the media shouldn't include the supers in their state-by-state delegate count. It hasn't caused a lot of problems aside from New Hampshire and Wyoming, but it does give people an excuse to scream "THE SYSTEM IS RIGGED" for the sake of it.
 

teiresias

Member
People do realize if they make the supers vote with the winner of the state you are effectively creating a statewide WTA delegate equivalent bonus(like RNC) which would further screw your candidate who is losing.

But that's not what they want. They want Supers in States Bernie won to view for him to represent their state, but they want Supers in States Clinton won to vote for Bernie because of Bernmentum . . . or something.
 

NeoXChaos

Member
Taniel ‏@Taniel 8m8 minutes ago
First Connecticut poll since November, by @EmersonPolling, has Trump at 50%, with 7% still undecided (CT has a 50% winner-take-all trigger).

Ivysaur12 dad please come through for us.
 

Holmes

Member
Ivysaur12 dad please come through for us.
Connecticut is WTA by CD, so a 24% lead would mean Trump sweeps all CD delegates. There are 15 statewide delegates that are awarded proportionally unless Trump passes that 50% threshold, so even if he doesn't, he'll probably get about 23 delegates from the state. But crossing 50% might mean 5 or 6 more delegates so I hope he does.
 

Hazmat

Member
Horse races mean ratings.

Blowout in the Dem race just means more Trump Coverage.

I know, the "unrelated" bit was sarcastic. They're also scoring higher demand for their ad time, and not just for the news channels but also for the other TV stations that their parent companies own.
 

ivysaur12

Banned
Connecticut is WTA by CD, so a 24% lead would mean Trump sweeps all CD delegates. There are 15 statewide delegates that are awarded proportionally unless Trump passes that 50% threshold, so even if he doesn't, he'll probably get about 23 delegates from the state. But crossing 50% might mean 5 or 6 more delegates so I hope he does.

My guess is that almost all of the Kasich voters are in CT-5, but that also includes Bridgeport so that could be enough for him to keep it.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
Give your family big hugs when Thanksgiving comes if Trump is nominee and goes down in electoral defeat.



Trump is sweeping all the delegates.

Except Trump generally underperforms compared to his poll numbers.
 

hawk2025

Member
So everyone went down except for Kasich, but that might all be statistical noise, with the exception of Sanders.

To be clear, it can always be just "noise". As you put it, even a 4pt change may simply be sampling error depending on where we set the significance threshold for the null hypothesis.

We use the typical 95% and 99% thresholds to say that something is not "noise", but that's not precise to what the estimation actually means. In the perfect world, all of these comparisons would always be made making the significance levels clear.


...I have no idea why I typed all of this.
 

NeoXChaos

Member
Plinko lets wait 8 more weeks before we push the Cruz is going to be the nominee narrative. Let's see how many Trump is short of after the 7th of June.

Sam Stein ‏@samsteinhp 5m5 minutes ago
Had a Bernie supporter tell me today that Clinton’s didnt really win in MA or Ariz (corruption issues), Nev or MO (certification ones)
HAHAHAHAAH
 

hawk2025

Member
Although I am on super thin ice with the mods, I dropped the satire. people need to take some of Carson's valium and chill, all this infighting over process is so dumb.

It's true, it seems like the (internet) fighting has slid down to pretty much mostly the process at this point.

Which yeah, is pretty dumb.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom