Telling.
Telling.
Oh shittt. I have you beat, Daniel B.
Bernie probably retroactively won Nevada: https://mobile.twitter.com/ClarkDems/status/716408177307168768
Bernie probably retroactively won Nevada: https://mobile.twitter.com/ClarkDems/status/716408177307168768
yeah, who needs science anyway.Space programs were just dick measuring contests anyway. Better fix things down here first.
I'm curious what your thoughts are on building expensive pointless warplanes.Meme magic is real.
Space programs were just dick measuring contests anyway. Better fix things down here first.
That and this 2008 Hillary attack ad video surfacing have made today very enjoyable
That and this 2008 Hillary attack ad video surfacing have made today very enjoyable
Everyone's avatars look too similar.
I'm curious what your thoughts are on building expensive pointless warplanes.This is bait. Drudge siren.
Yup. A lot of Democrats are perfectly happy with how things have been going under Obama and want someone to continue his policies, not flip the table over. In fact I'd imagine a lot of people did see things like Obamacare as meaningful changes, and want to maintain the new normal for a while.So, my extended (black) family just revealed something telling.
Aunt: Can't say I like that old white man running against Hillary.
Me: Really? Why?
Aunt: I be watching him on CNN and it sound like to me like he don't like Obama's policies and every time he speak I feel like he's saying he don't like em, especially with all he accomplished.
Me (Obviously playing dumb): Now that you think about it, does sound right.
Uncle: Well Hillary wants to continue Barack's plans and that's A-OK to me.
*Everyone around the table nods, and proceeds to talk about sports*
I imagine this ain't too far from a lot of people.
What does her ad have to do with Bernie?So if Bernie can't win by actually winning, it's okay to Ron Paul the house down? Awesome.
You know your campaign is losing when you start to use Clinton 08 attacks and talking points against your opponent.That and this 2008 Hillary attack ad video surfacing have made today very enjoyable
What does her ad have to do with Bernie?
Bernie Sanders once blamed cervical cancer on a lack of orgasms.
Reading all sorts of fun stuff about this man today. Article's from a year ago, though.
You know your campaign is losing when you start to use Clinton 08 attacks and talking points against your opponent.
If only the common man could benefit from such worthless scientific progress as the insulin pump.On the other hand, you wouldn't be a good socialist if you took money from normal people to fund something that will not benefit them in any way. At best, they can hope that the technological innovations "trickle down."
Also, NB I get very very very bored by metacommentary in here about the make-up of the thread, or the make-up of the OT, or this person being delusional, or that person being delusional, or this person's post in that person's thread.
Where's pigeon to talk about policy?
Or Kev to tell me about his money?
Or Ivy to post tanks?
Bernie's messae would resonate more after a two-term GOP president who fucked everything up. Similar to how Obama (assuming he was a first term senator then) probably would have lost in 04 - Bush simply had too much public support.
Which isn't a big deal, really. Not the claim obviously, but that Bernie said something dumb. I mean, he said this a long time ago. I'm sure he doesn't believe it now. The point to take away from this isn't that "Bernie Sanders once said a bad thing!", but that there's probably just a lot of shit that's been said years ago that hasn't been dredged up yet because he hasn't yet been under the full force of the electoral spotlight
He's resorting to attacks against Clinton that she used against Obama when she was losing. He's also using another attack/talking point against her that she used against him during the primary - begging for more debates and attacking when they get rejected. It's a sign that things aren't going well.Isn't the ad attacking Obama for something that she's currently doing? How is this a negative for Bernie?
Well, then that leaves Ivy and tanks, because Kev is too busy farming.Since the thread is talking about cutting Social Security because of funding gaps I am not sure I have much to say without getting really snippy.
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that a country which can borrow an infinite amount of money at 1% needs to balance its budget.
I'm not sure if it was a vote in particular, I'm not sure if we're referring to the same thing.An strategic vote that allows him to pander to bald eagles once he runs in the generals. He already had it all figured it out back then.
There's an opportunity cost for sending giant missiles into space. If the argument for NASA is that it produces technological innovations, I'm sure we can get much better bang for our buck. I bet university research is much more cost effective than NASA and DARPA since they don't have to build field-ready stuff.If only the common man could benefit from such worthless scientific progress as the insulin pump.
He's resorting to attacks against Clinton that she used against Obama when she was losing. He's also using another attack/talking point against her that she used against him during the primary - begging for more debates and attacking when they get rejected. It's a sign that things aren't going well.
Well, then that leaves Ivy and tanks, because Kev is too busy farming.
There's an opportunity cost for sending giant missiles into space. If the argument for NASA is that it produces technological innovations, I'm sure we can get much better bang for our buck. I bet university research is much more cost effective than NASA and DARPA since they don't have to build field-ready stuff.
Well, that program directly helps a normal person! Sending giant missiles into space can only help normal people indirectly. So that's where AfterBerner is coming from.There's an opportunity cost for giving people who want to do art history and film studies free college
While serving in the House, Sanders voted to ban therapeutic cloning in 2001, 2003 and 2005 as Congress grappled with the ethics of biotechnology and scientific advances. Patient advocacy groups note that Sanders co-sponsored bans in 2003 and 2005 that included criminal penalties for conducting the research and opposed alternatives that would have allowed the cloning of embryos solely for medical research.
Clinton, meanwhile, co-sponsored legislation in 2001 and 2002 in the Senate that would have expanded stem cell research and co-sponsored a bill in 2005 that would have banned human cloning while protecting the right of scientists to conduct stem cell research.
Cock uses are a big mess. Having said that, there's no excuse for Clinton's delegates not showing up or having the required alternates in place. That type of thing needs to be fixed, although it doesn't make a huge bit of difference in the grand scheme of things.
My best friend was leaning towards Bernie until that happened. She work(ed) for Planned Parenthood. She was livid, absolutely livid.
I currently work for PP, absolute scorn for Bernie around these parts, lol.
There's an opportunity cost for giving people who want to do art history and film studies free college
I think Kerry's candidacy is somewhat understated in hindsight. He would have won if he managed to pull it off in Ohio.Yeah, there's a reason Hillary didn't run in 2004. This is also why I think the Kerry campaign gets a bit of a bad rap. It wasn't great, but it was fine. He basically did about as well as a generic Democrat should be expected to do in that election.
Gore, on the other hand, was a rather weak candidate. There was no excuse for losing 2000. I will give him credit for closing strong though. A lot of his wounds were self-inflicted that campaign, but he made a nice comeback in the final month or so. Perhaps if he'd had a little more time he could have still pulled it off.
I haven't looked at US statistics, but in AU approximately half of those completing undergrad degrees in the life sciences, chemistry, and who seek FT employment are still doing so 4 months post graduation, which is near the bottom of the table. With only like Creative Arts degrees below from memory.I've made this suggestion before, but it really doesn't make any sense to suggest that STEM degrees are the only ones that need subsidizing. Pursuing a STEM degree is already subsidized by the free market, because you can easily get a high-paying job with one. If anything, STEM degrees are the only ones we should not be subsidizing.
must have been fake, don't see the tweet any longer
Hillary Clinton‏@HiIIIaryCIinton
#SignsYoureABernieSupporter apparently include beating up on the good, hardworking people at @GoldmanSachs and @BankofAmerica for no reason.
lol
must have been fake, don't see the tweet any longer
Yup. A lot of Democrats are perfectly happy with how things have been going under Obama and want someone to continue his policies, not flip the table over. In fact I'd imagine a lot of people did see things like Obamacare as meaningful changes, and want to maintain the new normal for a while.
Bernie's messae would resonate more after a two-term GOP president who fucked everything up. Similar to how Obama (assuming he was a first term senator then) probably would have lost in 04 - Bush simply had too much public support.
I think Kerry's candidacy is somewhat understated in hindsight. He would have won if he managed to pull it off in Ohio.
Compare that to someone like Romney who lost pretty much every swing state. The one that he won (NC) shouldn't have been a swing state either.