RastaMentality
Banned
Haven't really heard about trump much this week. I don't understand this terrible, horrible, no good week he's been having. I don't think the abortion comments would actually make waves.
AARP?
This is kind of one issue I'm a little iffy on w/r/t Democrats holding the line. Obama almost made a deal with Boehner to cut entitlement benefits and the deal only fell through because it didn't go far enough for the tea party. Like I could fully see Hillary taking SS benefit cuts as a compromise in order to get something done.
Like don't get me wrong, it's not like I think she'll get in there and immediately propose gutting everything, but the grand bargain fiasco makes me wary.
AARP?
This is kind of one issue I'm a little iffy on w/r/t Democrats holding the line. Obama almost made a deal with Boehner to cut entitlement benefits and the deal only fell through because it didn't go far enough for the tea party. Like I could fully see Hillary taking SS benefit cuts as a compromise in order to get something done.
Like don't get me wrong, it's not like I think she'll get in there and immediately propose gutting everything, but the grand bargain fiasco makes me wary.
Ed: if Cramer is tying himself to Trump and Trump is the nominee, maybe Iron Eye could beat him... Hmmmmmmm... If Democrats want a House majority they'll need some shockers, seats that were never on the table.
Entitlements don't need saving. Raise taxes, turn into special fund. Done....if Obama and Boehner had been able to finalize their Grand Bargain...that was the future of the country saved. It's a ShatterPoint. I will spend the rest of my life wondering how we would have gone forward had they been able to seal that deal. It...it hurts me, deep inside, on a primal level, that it was rebuffed. That was...regardless of politics, and personal beliefs...with our country's population and belief....the right thing to do, IMO.. I know Barry's gonna spend the rest of his life wondering "What If?"..
Ugh,
AARP?
This is kind of one issue I'm a little iffy on w/r/t Democrats holding the line. Obama almost made a deal with Boehner to cut entitlement benefits and the deal only fell through because it didn't go far enough for the tea party. Like I could fully see Hillary taking SS benefit cuts as a compromise in order to get something done.
Like don't get me wrong, it's not like I think she'll get in there and immediately propose gutting everything, but the grand bargain fiasco makes me wary.
Ed: if Cramer is tying himself to Trump and Trump is the nominee, maybe Iron Eye could beat him... Hmmmmmmm... If Democrats want a House majority they'll need some shockers, seats that were never on the table.
Bernie probably retroactively won Nevada: https://mobile.twitter.com/ClarkDems/status/716408177307168768
Nate Cohn, Larry Sabato, and Sam Wang are the big names.
"Clark County convention was today, Hillary delegates failed to show up, Bernie delegates stayed hours and hours"Bernie probably retroactively won Nevada: https://mobile.twitter.com/ClarkDems/status/716408177307168768
Would rather wait until we have a Dem Congress and do something better tbh....if Obama and Boehner had been able to finalize their Grand Bargain...that was the future of the country saved. It's a ShatterPoint. I will spend the rest of my life wondering how we would have gone forward had they been able to seal that deal. It...it hurts me, deep inside, on a primal level, that it was rebuffed. That was...regardless of politics, and personal beliefs...with our country's population and belief....the right thing to do, IMO.. I know Barry's gonna spend the rest of his life wondering "What If?"..
Ugh,
Entitlements don't need saving. Raise taxes, turn into special fund. Done.
also that Clark County shift amounts to, literally, one national delegate
Entitlements don't need saving. Raise taxes, turn into special fund. Done.
Would rather wait until we have a Dem Congress and do something better tbh.
Nah, it's like the parable of the tortoise and the hare. The hare was the overwhelming frontrunner so it took time off to fundraise and then...also that Clark County shift amounts to, literally, one national delegate
Problem is, after the Bush tax cuts, I think the right thing to do was to hit entitlements and raise taxes. You can't get that money back, basically.
Guys, it's completely fair to ask questions about the candidate you want for president. There is no problem with that.
Bernie probably retroactively won Nevada: https://mobile.twitter.com/ClarkDems/status/716408177307168768
I'm no Clinton fan, but the idea that general election polling is at all valid right now, when most of the country has not had the massive tax increases Bernie is calling for blared at them at full volume for two months, is laughable. I think Clinton is a pretty weak candidate who is only strong because of the complete implosion of the Republican party, but Sanders would be a disaster for the Dems in a general election.
Yeah it's dumb. People might point to Bill's working relationship with a GOP Congress but that was him trying to make the best of a shitty situation. His first two years were fairly progressive.He called her a secret right winger who is hoping the GOP wins the house and Senate so that she can pass her right wing agenda.
That's not asking questions that's acute Clinton Derangement Syndrome.
Honestly a big part of why I don't support Sanders despite agreeing with most of what he stands for is that he would make such a terrible candidate. It doesn't matter how much you earnestly explain the net effects on people's finances of his proposals, campaigning on massively increasing everyone's taxes is electoral suicide. And there's a lot of attacks on him that no one has made yet that would be absolutely devastating. Trump's liabilities are so severe that who knows what would happen, but I think even Cruz could defeat him without much trouble and if Kasich or someone else who could essentially run as "generic Republican" came out of a contested convention it would likely be a landslide.
I also think he'd actually make a completely ineffective president since he would have no base of support in Congress and seemingly has no interest in building one (which is why I find all the talk of a "political revolution" to be such nonsense, a revolution can't begin and end with electing a president), nor does he really have the right skills to build consensus or any of a million things that are important for a president to do that being an independent Senator doesn't really prepare you for.
Yeah it's dumb. People might point to Bill's working relationship with a GOP Congress but that was him trying to make the best of a shitty situation. His first two years were fairly progressive.
The only reason Obama doesn't have much that's equivalent to welfare reform (well the sequester) is because the GOP has completely gone off the deep end and no longer has rational policy goals. It's all just repeal Obamacare this, get rid of energy efficient lightbulbs and healthy school lunches that.
To be kind of frank, he seems like he'd be an ineffective President for entirely different reasons imo. He just doesn't seem to have any real interest in governing. Or policy outside his natural wheelhouse. There's probably argument to be made that this ultimately doesn't matter I suppose. A President has his Cabinet, NSAdvisors, Joint Chiefs, CEA and so on. I'm not wholly convinced he's that interested in looking through briefing books etc.
Loathe Clinton as much as one can, no one can deny that she's a quick study wonk.
Donald Trump excites a lot of enthusiasm, Rove said about the Republican frontrunner. But he also excites a lot of anger within the Republican Party and outside of the Republican Party. And a fresh face might be the thing that could give us a chance to turn this election and win in November against Hillary.
To be kind of frank, he seems like he'd be an ineffective President for entirely different reasons imo. He just doesn't seem to have any real interest in governing. Or policy outside his natural wheelhouse. There's probably argument to be made that this ultimately doesn't matter I suppose.
Loathe Clinton as much as one can, no one can deny that she's a quick study wonk.
This is really an underrated aspect of how stupid caucuses are. Like, don't get me wrong, the way they limit turnout to people who have the ability/inclination to spend hours on the process is a huge problem. But the added layers to translate votes into delegates for the national convention that are vulnerable to all kinds of shenanigans doesn't get talked about enough.Can we imagine what would have happened if Hillary had netted more delegates than Bernie in a state he won? Oh lawd help us all.
To be kind of frank, he seems like he'd be an ineffective President for entirely different reasons imo. He just doesn't seem to have any real interest in governing. Or policy outside his natural wheelhouse. There's probably argument to be made that this ultimately doesn't matter I suppose. And he does have some local level executive experience a long time ago. A President has his Cabinet, NSAdvisors, Joint Chiefs, CEA and so on. I'm not wholly convinced he's that interested in looking through briefing books etc.
Loathe Clinton as much as one can, no one can deny that she's a quick study wonk.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi..._to_blame_me_for_gop_losses_in_2008_2012.html
Damn, Karl Rove spills the beans so hard.
Also adding to dismissing anyone who disagrees with him as the establishment and his inability to compromise.
Bwahahaha
Yes, screw over your voters and pretend their votes don't count. Please proceed, Rovernor.
If the polls hold and Cruz wins most of Wisconsin's delegates on Tuesday, that will have serious consequences for the rest of the Republican nomination battle, and will increase the likelihood of a chaotic, contested GOP convention. That's exactly the outcome a lot of Republican leaders want, and as a national story it's seen as a sort of comeback by the GOP establishment.
The Planned Parenthood fiasco was the turning point for me.
“Donald Trump excites a lot of enthusiasm,” Rove said about the Republican frontrunner. “But he also excites a lot of anger within the Republican Party and outside of the Republican Party. And a fresh face might be the thing that could give us a chance to turn this election and win in November against Hillary.”
???
Anyone know the context of that video clip...? Didn't know Bernie had a history of being against space program funding, unless I'm misinterpreting it.
He what!? Holy shit. Whelp, any sympathy I had is gone. Not like the SSC would've helped or anything. Is this because Reagan okayed it?
This is really an underrated aspect of how stupid caucuses are. Like, don't get me wrong, the way they limit turnout to people who have the ability/inclination to spend hours on the process is a huge problem. But the added layers to translate votes into delegates for the national convention that are vulnerable to all kinds of shenanigans doesn't get talked about enough.
Now, I don't really blame any campaign taking advantage of the rules that exist, but it's not a good look to make the will of the people a big talking point while gleefully taking advantage of this.
The Planned Parenthood fiasco was the turning point for me.
Again, is there where I point out Bill Clinton vetoed the welfare reform bill twice?
But, I would hope Hillary Clinton would govern far from LBJ & Truman when it comes to nuking civilian populations or interning entire ethnicity in a certain area due to concerns over their loyalty or selling out the African American community to pass social welfare programs.
Yeah, I think this captures the essence of why he'd be an ineffective president better than what I wrote. I guess I'd say that a lot of what I said is kind of a consequence of his lack of interest in governing. You can get away with using a position as independent Senator (or as a presidential candidate) to largely get a big picture message across. The presidency is a different story, no matter how much the left romanticizes the power of the bully pulpit.To be kind of frank, he seems like he'd be an ineffective President for entirely different reasons imo. He just doesn't seem to have any real interest in governing. Or policy outside his natural wheelhouse. There's probably argument to be made that this ultimately doesn't matter I suppose. And he does have some local level executive experience a long time ago. A President has his Cabinet, NSAdvisors, Joint Chiefs, CEA and so on. I'm not wholly convinced he's that interested in looking through briefing books etc.
Loathe Clinton as much as one can, no one can deny that she's a quick study wonk.
It's pretty much in line with his view on anything.???
Anyone know the context of that video clip...? Didn't know Bernie had a history of being against space program funding, unless I'm misinterpreting it.
Bernie + Wisconsin + racial minorities = itsnothing.gif
That's some deep shade