• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2016 |OT6| Delete your accounts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Turns out it was apparently just the non binding Presidential Primary today. Downticket is another day cause reasons
That's what I'm reading as well. 3x the number of people participate in nothing more than a beauty contest.... But caucuses are the real determinations of support...
 

Mike M

Nick N
WA used to split the allocation between caucus and primary results, but then a ballot initiative gave us a supremely shitty open primary system where the two highest voted candidates advance to the general. It's theoretically possible for the general to be between two members of the same party, not that it would happen. After that, our primaries were declared nonbinding.

Caucuses are shit, but I don't know if they're more shit than open primaries.
 
WA used to split the allocation between caucus and primary results, but then a ballot initiative gave us a supremely shitty open primary system where the two highest voted candidates advance to the general. It's theoretically possible for the general to be between two members of the same party, not that it would happen. After that, our primaries were declared nonbinding.

Caucuses are shit, but I don't know if they're more shit than open primaries.

I don't like open primaries, but I still believe caucuses are the worst of the worst. Given the choice between the two, I'd take an open ass primary every day of the week.
 
Well, yeah.
tumblr_mihu9e6jHT1rdutw3o1_400.gif
 

Armaros

Member
Maybe it's just me, but it seems like the "superdelegates should vote with their state" talk has almost completely died down, both from the campaign itself and from supporters. Now it's 100% "superdelegates should vote for whoever has the best GE polls."

I can't imagine why they aren't using that talking point anymore.

They completely switched to GE polling because people pointed out to them, if they forced supers to vote like pledged delegates, Hillary wins even more.
 

Mike M

Nick N
I don't like open primaries, but I still believe caucuses are the worst of the worst. Given the choice between the two, I'd take an open ass primary every day of the week.
A party's ability to maintain control over their selection process is important to me. Caucuses are an archaic method that doesn't scale to modern population sizes, they're messy and confusing, but they're closed, so... Yeah.

Just have a "caucus" and rewrite the rules so that people show up and cast a single ballot, sidestep the whole mess.
I doubt that's legally possible in most if not all caucus states.
 
Caucuses are shit, but I don't know if they're more shit than open primaries.

Open Primaries really aren't that bad. If anything a lot of the self-described Independents that they keep out are potential future party members. A majority of the people left by the wayside who supported Sanders were young unaffiliated voters, and those are absolutely a crowd the Democrats should be courting because it's a group they can count on for decades to come. Then again I'm not part of the apparent "Fuck non-Party Loyalists" crowd. I think all states should just do Open Primaries--force the parties to actually court voters rather than just sit back and play to a specific demographic.
 

Cipherr

Member
Jesus she's not great but to fire her to avoid the great berning is kinda gross.

I reaaaaaaally dislike DWS. But yeah, to boot her just to appeal to people you think will riot at the convention is like... I damn near hate the woman and even that would leave a bad taste in my mouth. She sucks and needs to go. But like this? To appease people threatening you?

I wouldn't do it personally.
 
Open Primaries really aren't that bad. If anything a lot of the self-described Independents that they keep out are potential future party members. A majority of the people left by the wayside who supported Sanders were young unaffiliated voters, and those are absolutely a crowd the Democrats should be courting because it's a group they can count on for decades to come. Then again I'm not part of the apparent "Fuck non-Party Loyalists" crowd. I think all states should just do Open Primaries--force the parties to actually court voters rather than just sit back and play to a specific demographic.


The young people who historically don't vote? No matter what you tell them?
 
I reaaaaaaally dislike DWS. But yeah, to boot her just to appeal to people you think will riot at the convention is like... I damn near hate the woman and even that would leave a bad taste in my mouth. She sucks and needs to go. But like this? To appease people threatening you?

I wouldn't do it personally.

Meh, if it's something that has been in the making why not use it to your advantage and kill two birds with one stone?

Replace DWS and appease some people who would otherwise make a fit.
 

Armaros

Member
Meh, if it's something that has been in the making why not use it to your advantage and kill two birds with one stone?

Replace DWS and appease some people who would otherwise make a fit.

I would be all for it, besides the fact taht Bernie would demand he chooses the new Chair.
 

Iolo

Member
Yeah, like I anticipated, the price of Sanders is to name Tulsi the new DNC head.

If he can also get some distancing from Israel into the party platform I'll consider the whole thing a net victory.

There is zero chance of either of these happening.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGG3DJAALkw

Superdelegates don't count until we want them to count.

Hillary's June 7th concession speech

What's Sanders going to say? I know some will demand that he concede on the 7th, but I don't think he needs to. It's a tough process and like Hillary did he should take a couple days. But that's the question, isn't it. I can imagine him coming out defiant on the 7th, and on the 8th or 9th refusing to acknowledge Hillary as the presumptive nominee. Or maybe he'll do the right thing. Who knows.

Either way the farce will be over and Obama will be able to get off the sidelines. But I'm curious to see how Sanders handles it.
 

NeoXChaos

Member
Hillary's June 7th concession speech

What's Sanders going to say? I know some will demand that he concede on the 7th, but I don't think he needs to. It's a tough process and like Hillary did he should take a couple days. But that's the question, isn't it. I can imagine him coming out defiant on the 7th, and on the 8th or 9th refusing to acknowledge Hillary as the presumptive nominee. Or maybe he'll do the right thing. Who knows.

Either way the farce will be over and Obama will be able to get off the sidelines. But I'm curious to see how Sanders handles it.

any hints to what role Obama will play at the convention? have they started on the speech yet? Is he going to put Hillary's name into nomination?

I doubt you can say anything even if you knew :(

Eh we'll get hints from you hopefully by July or leaks through press. :)
 
Fuck.👏 Tulsi. 👏 Gabbard. 👏 You.👏 Islamaphobic.👏 Homophobe. 👏

Preach.

If she had endorsed Queen, she's have been (rightfully) thrown under the bus for her shitty stance on a bunch of issues. But, she endorsed Bernie so it's all good.
 
Preach.

If she had endorsed Queen, she's have been (rightfully) thrown under the bus for her shitty stance on a bunch of issues. But, she endorsed Bernie so it's all good.

She wouldn't have been a special snowflake if she did. A lot of shitty people endorsed Hillary. We just don't talk about them because almost everyone endorsed Hillary.
 
The young people who historically don't vote? No matter what you tell them?

It can't even be counted on now...

So they should be further disenfranchised and pushed out of the political process?


Pretty much. If they are going to remove her from the DNC because of her bad publicity they aren't going to make her the VP nominee. Can you even begin to imagine the controversy that would stir?
 

Armaros

Member
So they should be further disenfranchised and pushed out of the political process?

They disenfranchise themselves, even with massive effort to get them to vote and participate.

They cry for instant results, pout when they dont get their way and then go home and dont vote. So excuse the grown adults if they dont try to coddle them even more then we already do.
 
They disenfranchise themselves, even with massive effort to get them to vote and participate.

They cry for instant results, pout when they dont get their way and then go home and dont vote. So excuse the grown adults if they dont try to coddle them even more then we already do.

They had no problem showing up for Obama or for Sanders during this primary season. I find it hard to believe they are being coddled at all when most major candidates for Congress\President don't represent the beliefs of Millennials and are begrudgingly accepting those of Gen X'ers. Shit, even Sanders platform coddles old people by promising them so much Social Security money they will move up an entire income bracket. Things like LGBTQ Rights, Womens Rights, Drug Reform, Criminal Justice Reform, and Income Inequality are things that appeal to younger voters, and those are the issues that candidates try to avoid, instead focusing on Religious Bullshit, Why Abortion Makes You a Monster, and Who Cares More About Veterens.
 
any hints to what role Obama will play at the convention? have they started on the speech yet? Is he going to put Hillary's name into nomination?

I doubt you can say anything even if you knew :(

Eh we'll get hints from you hopefully by July or leaks through press. :)

Dunno. But it'll be fun and I'll be there.
 

Armaros

Member
They had no problem showing up for Obama or for Sanders during this primary season. I find it hard to believe they are being coddled at all when most major candidates for Congress\President don't represent the beliefs of Millennials and are begrudgingly accepting those of Gen X'ers. Shit, even Sanders platform coddles old people by promising them so much Social Security money they will move up an entire income bracket.

The Youth vote didnt even last two years into the 2008 presidency before they gave up and 2010 happened. That with an almost unprecedented midterm campaign from obama. Still, nothing.
 
So they should be further disenfranchised and pushed out of the political process?



Pretty much. If they are going to remove her from the DNC because of her bad publicity they aren't going to make her the VP nominee. Can you even begin to imagine the controversy that would stir?

Not catering to the people least likely to vote isn't disenfranchisment it's called trying to win an election.

If young people want to be players at the table and get taken seriously start voting in reliable numbers. They are the largest group of eligible voters yet pretty much the smallest when the votes are counted.
 

sc0la

Unconfirmed Member
The party should take control of the primary process. Party pays for primaries, caucuses if they occur do not impart delegates and are paid for by the state party. they happen in clusters of 5 states over say, 3 months. the clusters are randomized each election so no one state always goes early all the time and they are not constantly trying to out jockey each other for standing.
It can be like the NBA draft so the closer to first you are one time the less draws you get on the next cycle.

Edit:
Let me jazz this up for PoliGAF.
Sad! Caucuses where a mistake *airhorn*
dragqueen.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom