teruterubozu
Member
Who's doing it anywhere close to as well as she is though?
I mean, she's doing fine right now, getting under Trump's skin. Why does she have to be VP to continue it?
Who's doing it anywhere close to as well as she is though?
Turns out it was apparently just the non binding Presidential Primary today. Downticket is another day cause reasons
WASHINGTON Ever since talk radio, cable news and the Internet emerged in the 1990s as potent political forces on the right, Republicans have used those media to attack their opponents through a now-familiar two-step.
Political operatives would secretly place damaging information with friendly outlets like The Drudge Report and Fox News and with radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh and then they would work to get the same information absorbed into the mainstream media.
Theyve reverse-engineered the way it has always worked because they now have a candidate willing to say it himself, said Danny Diaz, who was a top aide in Jeb Bushs presidential campaign, speaking with a measure of wonder about the spectacle of the partys presumptive nominee discussing Mr. Clintons sexual escapades.
With Mr. Trump as the Republican standard-bearer, the line separating the conservative mischief makers and the partys more buttoned-up cadre of elected officials and aides has been obliterated. Fusing what had been two separate but symbiotic forces, Mr. Trump has begun a real-life political science experiment: What happens when a major partys nominee is more provocateur than politician?
No way will Hillary win with Warren. That's a guaranteed Trump presidency.
Paul Ryan is a grade A cuck.
How are you gonna endorse him now, after he's just gone even further down this path of offending everyone and throwing out old trash at hillary.
Booker is NJ.If he wasn't from NY I could see Cory Booker. Tim Kaine will probably be the VP.
Death of the party is happening.Trump has once again found himself unable to let it go..
@realDonaldTrump
---
And ABC News is breaking that Paul Ryan is going to endore Trump. Surprise! (not)
No way will Hillary win with Warren. That's a guaranteed Trump presidency.
Explain this line of thinking
Trump has once again found himself unable to let it go..
@realDonaldTrump
---
And ABC News is breaking that Paul Ryan is going to endore Trump. Surprise! (not)
Takes me back to the good old days a few months ago when so many on this board said that these guys would never unite behind Trump.
Hillary needs to diversify the ticket with a younger up-and-comer who could be the face of the next generation.
Dems' main weakness is their talent pool is running thin in the next-gen department.
They need a WWE NXT departamental division and come up with youthful energetic Democrats.
Republicans were trying out Marco Rubio but Donald Trump torpedoed him out of the water, LOL
Remember when Sanders won the caucus in Washington, and there was a massive campaign to get super delegates in the state to support him, specifically targeting them and trying to shame them etc?
Well looks like they just lost that line of attack eh?
I think the moment that has surprised me most on this was when the Graham news came out.Takes me back to the good old days a few months ago when so many on this board said that these guys would never unite behind Trump.
Paul Ryan finally going to endorse Trump apparently.
I guess Trump accusing Hillary of killing Vince Foster proved to Ryan that he's a true Republican.
Takes me back to the good old days a few months ago when so many on this board said that these guys would never unite behind Trump.
Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 24m24 minutes ago
The protesters in New Mexico were thugs who were flying the Mexican flag. The rally inside was big and beautiful, but outside, criminals!
1,517 retweets 3,813 likes
Summer soldiers. Once the GE spools up and Trump is losing handily, I think we'll see plenty of deserters.
They're getting fooled by his minor little bump he's gotten the last few weeks. Let them tie themselves to him. When the polls shift, they won't be able to untie themselves from him
I think the moment that has surprised me most on this was when the Graham news came out.
Just.. wow.
*Headdesk*
Can it be June 7th already plz?
H.A. Goodman is typing his next piece of work as we speak..Breaking: state Department says Hilary violated email rules.(by not turning them over before she left)
Paul Ryan is a grade A cuck.
So how worried should we be about this email thing?
Considering what the State Department just said was basically a finger wag and also said the past two SoS's are just as guilty should tell you this won't amount to anything.
I think the FBI will write a strongly worded scolding letter to her, also mentioning past secretaries, and that'll be the end of it. I can't imagine the FBI's investigation would be much different than the State Department.
What an orange.
*Headdesk*
Can it be June 7th already plz?
I was watching the protests live and it got pretty ugly. Violent, angry protesting is not classy.
There's functionally no way for an indictment to come through that would hold up if it didn't also lead to indictments or massive investigations of past secretaries, and that's not happening.
I agree with your prediction for the FBI.
*Headdesk*
Can it be June 7th already plz?
What I took from this is that Hillary is Roman ReignsHillary needs to diversify the ticket with a younger up-and-comer who could be the face of the next generation.
Dems' main weakness is their talent pool is running thin in the next-gen department.
They need a WWE NXT departamental division and come up with youthful energetic Democrats.
Republicans were trying out Marco Rubio but Donald Trump torpedoed him out of the water, LOL
Considering what the State Department just said was basically a finger wag and also said the past two SoS's are just as guilty should tell you this won't amount to anything.
I think the FBI will write a strongly worded scolding letter to her, also mentioning past secretaries, and that'll be the end of it. I can't imagine the FBI's investigation would be much different than the State Department.
Descriptive analysis of the intensity of candidate support (not presented in the tables) lends additional weight to this conclusion. If “sour grapes” were the primary explanation for defections to McCain, we might expect that Clinton supporters who supported her the most intensely would be most reluctant to vote for Obama. Using two different measures of intensity—self-reported certainty of support and observed stability in support—finds that those who supported Clinton the most intensely were actually more likely to rally behind Obama. We find that 82 percent of “certain” Clinton voters cast a ballot for Obama, compared to 78 percent of Clinton voters who said they might change their mind. Likewise, those respondents who consistently supported Clinton throughout the primary waves of the study were more likely to vote for Obama in the general election than were those respondents who only sometimes supported Clinton in these waves (81 percent versus 75 percent).
We next turn to see if racial attitudes correlated with defection to McCain among these thwarted Democratic primary voters. Not surprisingly, we find that those with much lower favorability toward Blacks relative to their favorability toward Whites were less likely to have rallied behind Obama in the general election. Those more favorable toward Whites than Blacks were predicted to be 26 percentage points more likely to vote for McCain than those more favorable toward Blacks—a quite sizeable effect However, the simulated impact on the election outcome suggests a far more modest influence of racial attitudes. If we simulate the election results among this sample changing nothing but racial attitudes such that all voters viewed Blacks and Whites equally favorably—we predict an increase in Obama’s vote share by 5.4 percentage points among thwarted Democratic primary voters, amounting to a one-percentage-point increase in his overall margin of victory. Of course, there may well be preferable measures of racial attitudes, especially ones less susceptible to social desirability bias. But based on this particular measure of racial attitudes, it appears that racial attitudes may have played a smaller role in the election outcomes than sometimes speculated
Compared to the relatively small effects of frustration and negative racial attitudes, we find quite large effects for ideology and Iraq War attitudes These issue relationships are the strongest among the covariates examined here—in terms of predicting both individual and aggregate outcomes. Moderate and liberal ideological views are associated with 24- and 33-percentagepoint declines in the probability of a McCain vote in the general election among this subset of Democratic primary voters. And those most strongly supportive of the War in Iraq are 69 percentage points more likely to vote for McCain in November than those least supportive of the war effort. In terms of the simulated election impact, if every non-Obama Democratic primary voter held liberal ideological views, Obama’s predicted share of their general election vote would have been 11.6 percentage points higher, which translates to a 2.1-percentage-point increase in Obama’s share of the two-party vote among the total electorate. Similarly, if the entire sample of non-Obama Democratic primary voters strongly opposed the War in Iraq, the nominee’s predicted share among this sample would have been 15.9 percentage points higher, or a 2.7-percentage-point increase in the general election outcome..
Given the tone of the letter and the fact that other past SoS are now involved as well (though not to the extent that Clinton is), I'm guessing this will be what happens.
Time to grease up my Reddit accountIndictment incoming.