• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2016 |OT6| Delete your accounts

Status
Not open for further replies.
The same thing occurred with the Fox debate that almost happened that Sanders was on board with and Trump backed out at the last minute before it was announced.
 

bananas

Banned
Preview of Trump/Bernie debate:

giphy.gif
 

PBY

Banned
The same thing occurred with the Fox debate that almost happened that Sanders was on board with and Trump backed out at the last minute before it was announced.

Yup. I just don't remember the groundswell of support for that one the way this one is being positioned. I mean, its all over politico/tpm/twitter, and you have stuff like this:
If the proposed debate between Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump comes to fruition, it would be “phenomenal,” Republican National Committee chief strategist and communications director Sean Spicer said Thursday.
“I think it would be a phenomenal debate if it happened,” Spicer told CNN.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/rnc-trump-bernie-sanders-debate-223610#ixzz49mRmNpuW


For the record, I don't think its gonna happen, but it feels different.
 
Hasn't he been working like 20 hour days since the campaign started? He's a lot of things but I don't think lazy is one of them

He doesn't even prepare for debates and it took him months to hire any staff other than felons to do work for him. He spends all of his time watching CNN. He's lazy as shit.
 

PBY

Banned
Weaver on a roll today

Noting a report that quoted a Clinton source remarking that DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz "poured gasoline on the fire" in the wake of the chaos of the Nevada Democratic Convention, Weaver told MSNBC's "Andrea Mitchell Reports" that she "really escalated the situation."

What Wasserman Schultz did is "really not the role a party chair should traditionally play," Weaver continued. "I mean, if you look at the Republican side, the party chair there has been working day and night to try and you know, keep everybody together and to try unify the party."
"And I think we need a similar effort on the Democratic side," he said.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/bernie-sanders-praises-rnc-223613#ixzz49mUKacwv
 
Gov. John Bel Edwards was not told ahead of time that Louisiana would be involved in a multi-state lawsuit challenging an Obama administration's directive concerning transgender students in public schools.

He learned Attorney General Jeff Landry had joined 10 other states in fighting Obama shortly after the lawsuit was announced in news reports Wednesday morning (May 25).

"The attorney general did not consult with the governor on his involvement in this lawsuit. The governor was only made aware of his participation through media reports, and will continue to review the case," said Richard Carbo, Edwards spokesman, in a written statement Wednesday afternoon.

Things are going well.

http://www.nola.com/politics/index....ab.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
 

JP_

Banned
I'm agreeing with you that I don't think he'll do it. I just don't understand really what he has to lose by getting on stage with Bernie.

Bernie will tear into him like Elizabeth Warren. Trump wants to attract Sanders supporters. Those two things aren't compatible.
 

GutsOfThor

Member
It's a good thing Sanders hired two incompetent morons to run his campaign otherwise we'd be looking at a very different contest.

Was there really no one else for Sanders to pick besides tweedledee and tweedledum?
 

Emarv

Member
I mean, if there's one person who has been worse at their job than DWS and probably hates their life more, it's fucking Reince Priebus. That man is internally screaming at all times and probably downs a bottle of whiskey every night for having to promote "unity" behind Trump.
 
the gakwer thread has got me scared for peoples respect for the 1st amendment.

gawker can be trash. but the whole point of the free press is we put up with trash for the good stuff. I don't want rich people dictating what good journalism is
 

JP_

Banned
You guys read way too much into every little thing Sanders and his camp says and then interpret it by trying to extrapolate the worst possible intentions.
 
the gakwer thread has got me scared for peoples respect for the 1st amendment.

gawker can be trash. but the whole point of the free press is we put up with trash for the good stuff. I don't want rich people dictating what good journalism is
Yep.

The point is not Gawker in and of itself. It's abuse of our justice system to stifle speech.
 
Still shocked Cruz didn't go to California, but Bernie did.

Cruz actually had somewhat of a chance.

He couldn't enjoy the democratic process quite as much. Bernie doesn't get picked on so personally and humiliated every day like Cruz did, which has been brutal for him and his family.
 
I wonder if Reince Priebus just starts sobbing occasionally.

I mean jeez. That dude messed up. He let the patients run the asylum and now he has no way of getting it back so he just smiles and waves and pretends it's all going to be fine while his entire party slowly decays into a huge joke.

The idea that he's doing a good job at anything is ridiculous. He's getting the boot as soon as possible, and I wouldn't be surprised if he just up and walks out instead of sticking around until he's officially done.
 
the gakwer thread has got me scared for peoples respect for the 1st amendment.

gawker can be trash. but the whole point of the free press is we put up with trash for the good stuff. I don't want rich people dictating what good journalism is

Like 5% of the population cares about the first amendment.

People on GAF only pretend to care about freedom of speech because they dislike black women telling them things.
 

pigeon

Banned
the gakwer thread has got me scared for peoples respect for the 1st amendment.

gawker can be trash. but the whole point of the free press is we put up with trash for the good stuff. I don't want rich people dictating what good journalism is

I mean, I agree with this, but at the same time, Gawker pretty clearly knew they were breaking the law and opening themselves up to liability and they went for it.

Rich people don't define journalism, but surely somebody defines it, and probably those definitions will make their way into law, right?


Zero votes were counted wrong? That sounds pretty suspicious! We need to do a recount.
 

HylianTom

Banned
I wonder if Reince Priebus just starts sobbing occasionally.

I mean jeez. That dude messed up. He let the patients run the asylum and now he has no way of getting it back so he just smiles and waves and pretends it's all going to be fine while his entire party slowly decays into a huge joke.

The idea that he's doing a good job at anything is ridiculous. He's getting the boot as soon as possible, and I wouldn't be surprised if he just up and walks out instead of sticking around until he's officially done.
tumblr_l48kiqw6ux1qzgmzp.gif
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
Yep.

The point is not Gawker in and of itself. It's abuse of our justice system to stifle speech.

Not really stifling speech though. Gawker outed Theil for no reason, it's not like they printed something mean about him. They crossed lines no one else would ever cross and got hit for it. The system worked as it's supposed to in this case.

I mean, I agree with this, but at the same time, Gawker pretty clearly knew they were breaking the law and opening themselves up to liability and they went for it.

Rich people don't define journalism, but surely somebody defines it, and probably those definitions will make their way into law, right?

It did make it's way into law, which is why Gawker got fucked. We're pretty much taught on day 1 that libel is bad and libel leads to you getting sued. That there's a difference between a public and private figure, that stories should be measured against the public's right to know. Gawker routinely ignored all of that.
 

teiresias

Member
He calls for party unity and this is how you spin it.

The only spin is trying to say the one campaign that is engaging in conspiratorial allegations of fraud against the party they're running to be the leader of is somehow earnestly calling for party unity
 
I mean, I agree with this, but at the same time, Gawker pretty clearly knew they were breaking the law and opening themselves up to liability and they went for it.

Rich people don't define journalism, but surely somebody defines it, and probably those definitions will make their way into law, right?
I mean i'm of the opinion pretty much everything is journalism if it doesn't have malicious intent. I don't think gawker ever got to that point.

and I don't think its clear gawker broke the law with the hogan stuff. And they clearly didn't with the thiel is gay article
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
I mean i'm of the opinion pretty much everything is journalism if it doesn't have malicious intent. I don't think gawker ever got to that point.

and I don't think its clear gawker broke the law with the hogan stuff. And they clearly didn't with the thiel is gay article

And outing the Conde Nast CFO was journalism?

Stories are supposed to be measured by how much the public cares about it vs do they have a right to know it. People don't need to know a person is gay if they're closeted except in very specific circumstances. There's a reason everyone basically united against Gawker when they outed that guy last year. It's not newsworthy.
 
Not really stifling speech though. Gawker outed Theil for no reason, it's not like they printed something mean about him. They crossed lines no one else would ever cross and got hit for it. The system worked as it's supposed to in this case.

Is the state supposed to police outings? We in this thread have discussed Aaron Schock
and shepard smith obvious homosexuality. Should we be sued?

I mean it sucks to defend pretty bad stuff but once we start going down that path we get the UK with its stupid super injunctions
 
Apparently Don hit the delegate threshold today?

Remember when we thought it would be a contested convention. It was guaranteed, there was no way Trump was ever hitting the total. The road was just too hard for him to do it, and Cruz would go all the way to make his run miserable.
Plinko was like nearing 100% on being sure of a contested convention. I took out all of my shares on that and it was all for naught.
 

Armaros

Member
I mean i'm of the opinion pretty much everything is journalism if it doesn't have malicious intent. I don't think gawker ever got to that point.

and I don't think its clear gawker broke the law with the hogan stuff. And they clearly didn't with the thiel is gay article

Aided a blackmailer in blackmailing and then outting a private citizen?

Deliberately ignoring a judges order to take down a video?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom