TheLaughingStock
Member
The issue is that his message has been problematically simplistic ("break up the banks" - whatever that means), vague in how it would accomplish its goal and doesn't seem to factor into account how difficult such policies would be able to implement in this political environment.
You could easily look up what it would entail with an internet search, alternatively go to school and become a regulator yourself, or talk to someone with a track record of success at the federal level in the US. Breaking up US institutions means imposing capital requirements corresponding to risks associated with size, non-commercial banking activity, compensation incentives, hiring, retention, and so on.