• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2016 |OT6| Delete your accounts

Status
Not open for further replies.
The issue is that his message has been problematically simplistic ("break up the banks" - whatever that means), vague in how it would accomplish its goal and doesn't seem to factor into account how difficult such policies would be able to implement in this political environment.

You could easily look up what it would entail with an internet search, alternatively go to school and become a regulator yourself, or talk to someone with a track record of success at the federal level in the US. Breaking up US institutions means imposing capital requirements corresponding to risks associated with size, non-commercial banking activity, compensation incentives, hiring, retention, and so on.
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
You could easily look up what it would entail, alternatively go to school and become a regulator yourself, or talk to someone with a track record of success at the federal level in the US. Breaking up US institutions means imposing capital requirements corresponding to risks associated with size, non-commercial banking activity, compensation incentives, hiring, retention, and so on.

It'd be nice if Bernie could actually talk about what that entails when asked about it point blank is what he's saying.
 

Emarv

Member

I assume they mean far wing of the party revolting against the party itself. I don't fully buy the comparison, but there is a form of ideological purity driving the Sanders movement reminiscent of the conservative purity of the early Tea Party.
 

Valhelm

contribute something
Without Superpac's how is Hillary suppose to compete with Billiionaire Donald Trump and the Billionaire's donating to them.

Like I wonder what Bernie thinks of Warren Buffett.

Bernie made the no super pacs promise back when he was still being grouped with Lincoln Chafee and Jim Webb, and never expected to win more than a couple states. As his popularity exploded, he stuck with it due to his image of sincerity and his own stubbornness.

Pragmatism is necessary, especially when promoting heterodox ideology.
 

gcubed

Member
You could easily look up what it would entail with an internet search, alternatively go to school and become a regulator yourself, or talk to someone with a track record of success at the federal level in the US. Breaking up US institutions means imposing capital requirements corresponding to risks associated with size, non-commercial banking activity, compensation incentives, hiring, retention, and so on.

great, maybe you should run for president!
 
Oh my God, I was kidding and it became real.

image.php


Bernie lacks finesse. His argument is that staying in the race allows him a place to talk about the issues unique to his campaign, but as the campaign has veered away from ideology and more toward personality this is no longer happening. He's probably doing more harm than good by not dropping, because his stubbornness could actually taint mainstream attitudes toward his political goals.

Yeah, I think his approval numbers after NY reflect this. A lot more Clinton supporters have soured on him, and others have jumped ship. Even his biggest online group is trending way down in every metric. Staffers are leaving, and he's just stumping like always. If you don't adapt over the primary, you just get blasted.

It's like in Battletoads, when you're on the surfboard. Sometimes, you go down. Sometimes up. But you have to keep moving to not crash.

holy shit battletoads is the hardest fucking game omg
 

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
Steve just decimated Sanders chances. It's not going to happen.
There is now no chance after seeing the results of Oregon.
 

Wilsongt

Member
image.php




Yeah, I think his approval numbers after NY reflect this. A lot more Clinton supporters have soured on him, and others have jumped ship. Even his biggest online group is trending way down in every metric. Staffers are leaving, and he's just stumping like always. If you don't adapt over the primary, you just get blasted.

It's like in Battletoads, when you're on the surfboard. Sometimes, you go down. Sometimes up. But you have to keep moving to not crash.

holy shit battletoads is the hardest fucking game omg

Yet someone almost completed that portion of the game during a speed run... Blindfolded.
 
You could easily look up what it would entail with an internet search, alternatively go to school and become a regulator yourself, or talk to someone with a track record of success at the federal level in the US. Breaking up US institutions means imposing capital requirements corresponding to risks associated with size, non-commercial banking activity, compensation incentives, hiring, retention, and so on.
Funny considering someone just posted this meme in another thread

Something about haters and hating.
 
Those Oregon results are a god damn dumpster fire for Bernie's campaign. This was freaking Oregon, where Hillary invested absolutely nothing. And that's the best he got? Man....if Queen had spent some capital there....damn.
 

Bowdz

Member
Elon Musk is a smart dude, but he works for his own success. He isn't overly concerned with the well-being of his workers, and his pursuit of science often isn't that scientific. Just look at his pie-in-the-sky pursuit of asteroid mining, which will make him very wealthy but not efficiently enrich our understanding of space. Somebody like Elon Musk can lead a company without using it as a framework to exploit those beneath him.

Yes, Musk, who invested $100 million of his own dollars into three companies, all of which are making the world a better place, is solely concerned with his own well being. Musk, while pushing his workers hard, not only pays them quite well, but creates an environment which is deemed meaningful by the workforce. In fact, SpaceX and Tesla are the top two most meaningful places to work in the US according to employees (https://m.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/499mnm/elon_musk_on_twitter_spacex_and_tesla_rated_most/).

Also, just for the record, Elon and SpaceX have nothing to do with asteroid mining. He has no desire to mine asteroids either.
 
Yes, Musk, who invested $100 million of his own dollars into three companies, all of which are making the world a better place, is solely concerned with his own well being. Musk, while pushing his workers hard, not only pays them quite well, but creates an environment which is deemed meaningful by the workforce. In fact, SpaceX and Tesla are the top two most meaningful places to work in the US according to employees (https://m.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/499mnm/elon_musk_on_twitter_spacex_and_tesla_rated_most/).

Also, just for the record, Elon and SpaceX have nothing to do with asteroid mining. He has no desire to mine asteroids either.

Nobody becomes a billionaire without a few bodies in the backyard. That's the simple facts. Elon Musk isn't the savior Reddit claims he is - he's just a capitalist that happens to be in an industry the Internet likes.
 

Bowdz

Member
Nobody becomes a billionaire without a few bodies in the backyard. That's the simple facts. Elon Musk isn't the savior Reddit claims he is - he's just a capitalist that happens to be in an industry the Internet likes.

He's cutthroat with his pursuit of the best product, but he represents the best of capitalism IMO. SpaceX's CCiCAP/CCDev NASA agreements and Tesla's government loan shows the way forward for the country with regards to private public partnerships.
 

JP_

Banned
Why make a stink over the "Bernie or bust" stuff?


  • Clinton dropped out in June 2008, but the month after that in July 2008, a whopping 54% of Clinton supporters said they wouldn't support Obama in the GE even after he was the presumptive nominee.
  • Sanders is still in the race, yet a poll from earlier this month found that Sanders supporters would support Clinton over Trump by a 86-to-10 margin.
  • Bernie or bust is already small compared to the anti-Obama hillary movement and Bernie or bust has longer to come around.
Relax :)

...a poll out from CNN on Wednesday finds [Sanders supporters] prefer Clinton to Trump by an 86-to-10 margin.

That's about the same ratio of Clinton supporters who voted for John McCain over Barack Obama in 2008, according to Emory political scientist Alan Abramowitz. And it's still early: As we move to the general election, Abramowitz says, Democrats are even more likely to swing behind their nominee.

...

In July 2008, 54 percent of Clinton voters said they wouldn't support Barack Obama in a general election. (They even had a nickname, "PUMAs" — "party unity my ass," the 2008 analog to today's "Bernie or bust-ers.")

http://www.vox.com/2016/5/4/11593434/bernie-sanders-poll-trump-clinton
 

Trouble

Banned
Yes, Musk, who invested $100 million of his own dollars into three companies, all of which are making the world a better place, is solely concerned with his own well being. Musk, while pushing his workers hard, not only pays them quite well, but creates an environment which is deemed meaningful by the workforce. In fact, SpaceX and Tesla are the top two most meaningful places to work in the US according to employees (https://m.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/499mnm/elon_musk_on_twitter_spacex_and_tesla_rated_most/).

Also, just for the record, Elon and SpaceX have nothing to do with asteroid mining. He has no desire to mine asteroids either.

I mean, even if he wanted to mine asteroids, so what? Long term space expansion is going to require it. Moving metal and water out of our gravity well is really resource intensive.
 
Those Oregon results are a god damn dumpster fire for Bernie's campaign. This was freaking Oregon, where Hillary invested absolutely nothing. And that's the best he got? Man....if Queen had spent some capital there....damn.
Yeah if she had taken the May contests more seriously she could have won Indiana and Oregon and gone 3/4 for the month. Oh well.

The fact that Bernie's wins still aren't enough makes his campaign more tragic.
 
Yet someone almost completed that portion of the game during a speed run... Blindfolded.

Rare Replay lets you rewind whenever you want. Only way I'm playing it haha.

He's cutthroat with his pursuit of the best product, but he represents the best of capitalism IMO. SpaceX's CCiCAP/CCDev NASA agreements and Tesla's government loan shows the way forward for the country with regards to private public partnerships.

Yeah, when people talk about collectivist systems, I never hear about how those systems would produce the results that companies like Tesla and SpaceX get. The reason is that they won't produce those results since no one would ever start such companies.
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
Why make a stink over the "Bernie or bust" stuff?


  • Clinton dropped out in June 2008, but the month after that in July 2008, a whopping 54% of Clinton supporters said they wouldn't support Obama in the GE even after he was the presumptive nominee.
  • Sanders is still in the race, yet a poll from earlier this month found that Sanders supporters would support Clinton over Trump by a 86-to-10 margin.
  • Bernie or bust is already small compared to the anti-Obama hillary movement and Bernie or bust has longer to come around.
Relax :)



http://www.vox.com/2016/5/4/11593434/bernie-sanders-poll-trump-clinton

Clinton put a lot of work in to help unite the party. Unless you think Bernie's going to put that same work in, there's a little reason to be nervous.
 

JP_

Banned
Yeah, when people talk about collectivist systems, I never hear about how those systems would produce the results that companies like Tesla and SpaceX get. The reason is that they won't produce those results since no one would ever start such companies.

I'm not anti-capitalist but I mean... NASA was going into space half a century ago. There's a place for socialism and there's a place for capitalism. America has always been mixed and it works.
 

pigeon

Banned
I'm not anti-capitalist but I mean... NASA was going into space decades ago. There's a place for socialism and there's a place for capitalism. America has always been mixed and it works.

I was actually just going to make this post.

SpaceX is best understood as a response to our government's abdication of its responsibility to engage in low-return research that would be to the collective good.

Actually this is true of a whole lot of extremely successful tech companies -- they're filling a lot of infrastructural roles that should probably be government responsibilities if we had a working government.
 

Valhelm

contribute something
Yes, Musk, who invested $100 million of his own dollars into three companies, all of which are making the world a better place, is solely concerned with his own well being. Musk, while pushing his workers hard, not only pays them quite well, but creates an environment which is deemed meaningful by the workforce. In fact, SpaceX and Tesla are the top two most meaningful places to work in the US according to employees (https://m.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/499mnm/elon_musk_on_twitter_spacex_and_tesla_rated_most/).

Also, just for the record, Elon and SpaceX have nothing to do with asteroid mining. He has no desire to mine asteroids either.

Even if Elon Musk is some kind of perfect benefactor, Americans shouldn't have to rely on the elite being good people. Because these kinds of businessmen are not elected and have no obligation to help others others than morality, giving them power is an enormous risk.

I think that private innovation is only useful when public innovation isn't an option. If properly democratized, a public alternative is just as efficient as the private sector and much less of a gamble.
 
LOL what? Now Sanders is talking about bottom up change?

The Bernie Sanders campaign that has run on vote Bernie he'll fix it?

Hilarious.

He was literally running on the idea that downticket races don;t need money, Sanders will just lift them to victory via his name.
 

JP_

Banned
I was actually just going to make this post.

SpaceX is best understood as a response to our government's abdication of its responsibility to engage in low-return research that would be to the collective good.

Actually this is true of a whole lot of extremely successful tech companies -- they're filling a lot of infrastructural roles that should probably be government responsibilities if we had a working government.

Yeah it's infuriating talking to libertarians that pretend the government had no role in the creation of the internet. It's scary to imagine what it might look like if it was created by a private corporation from the start. Certainly don't think we would have the relatively open and free internet it is today if US/CERN hadn't laid that initial groundwork as a public good.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom