Please, that shillary AI was good but the jig was up when you said you hated pizza. No true living American would dare say they hated pizza. No, you must be a machine of sorts.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
PoliGAF 2016 |OT6| Delete your accounts
- Thread starter Spoiled Milk
- Start date
- Status
Please, that shillary AI was good but the jig was up when you said you hated pizza. No true living American would dare say they hated pizza. No, you must be a machine of sorts.
User 463088
Banned
I am human. I do things. Like a human would do.
The other day, we ordered pizza, and I liked it. It was the Papa Johns hamburger pizza. It had pickles on it.
SO good. Obama is on fire at the moment. Yassss Mr President. Get it.
Yeah, Trump's going to completely freak out over this speech. Will be fun to watch.
BlastProcessing
Member
Holy crap this Obama speech is fire, people, hot fire.
I have strong opinions on this subject but I will not derail this thread.
God I can't wait until he enters campaign mode again.
God I can't wait until he enters campaign mode again.
Nazgul_Hunter
Member
I think this is it. This speech is great
saltypickles
Neo Member
This speech is so good goddamn
BlastProcessing
Member
This is it. He is in campaign mode. He just called Trump " a bunch of okey doke". It starts today.
Poodlestrike
Banned
I am human. I do things. Like a human would do.
The other day, we ordered pizza, and I liked it. It was the Papa Johns hamburger pizza. It had pickles on it.
Obama is on fire at the moment. Yassss Mr President. Get it.
Oh god
Shoulda figured that you'd take to the Marshmallow Vodka & Orange Gatorade of pizzas.
Jeff Weaver on CNN now, still openly discussing their strategy to steal the primary from the candidate who has the most votes and delegates. "The job of the superdelegates is not to mirror the voters, otherwise why are they there? Their job is to use their expertise to decide the best candidate for the election, and once they start to look at how Sanders is polling blah blah blah...."
5 months of screaming about the Establishment, and suddenly they think the Establishment is going to favor them over the person that actually won the election.
5 months of screaming about the Establishment, and suddenly they think the Establishment is going to favor them over the person that actually won the election.
BlastProcessing
Member
This was honestly one of Obama's best speeches. He weaves in a really complex and intricate lesson on global economics in an unbelievably digestible way.
Gonna miss this man.
Gonna miss this man.
Would have been glorious to cap it off with no man's sky
HanShotFirst
Member
With regards to the discussion of party control of the Presidency a page or two back, before E3 discussion, (contested E3?). I think its important to look at the winning coalitions or voter demographics of each winning presidential candidate.
For example, the period from 1968-2000(2004?). During that period, (and during the New Deal Coalition as well but im focusing on 1968 and onwards), Each winning candidate won some portion, or all, southern states. In other words, white conservatives were a part of every winning coalition. This period was dominated by Republicans thanks to the Southern strategy and the only democrats who won, won by appealing at least somewhat to white conservatives, (Carter, Clinton, and to a lesser extant Gore.)
However by 2008, demographics had changed to the point that to win the election a candidate no longer needed to win over white conservatives. I remember a while back some were saying in this thread Carter would have won in 1980 with today's demographics.
Anyway, I guess the point Im trying to make is that while some people say that control of the presidency goes back and forth, theres more to it than voter fatigue. And I would argue that since 2008(arguably 2004) the winning coalition has been squarely in the Democrat's camp and in order fro Republicans to win they need to appeal to Democratic voters, which I know is obvious, but perhaps a recession or fuck up blamed on Democrats wont be enough for Republicans to win back control of the White House.
Sorry for this somewhat long winded post and if I rambled on a bit to much lol. I mostly lurk here and post every now and then. anyway its just an observation I made feel free to argue it.
For example, the period from 1968-2000(2004?). During that period, (and during the New Deal Coalition as well but im focusing on 1968 and onwards), Each winning candidate won some portion, or all, southern states. In other words, white conservatives were a part of every winning coalition. This period was dominated by Republicans thanks to the Southern strategy and the only democrats who won, won by appealing at least somewhat to white conservatives, (Carter, Clinton, and to a lesser extant Gore.)
However by 2008, demographics had changed to the point that to win the election a candidate no longer needed to win over white conservatives. I remember a while back some were saying in this thread Carter would have won in 1980 with today's demographics.
Anyway, I guess the point Im trying to make is that while some people say that control of the presidency goes back and forth, theres more to it than voter fatigue. And I would argue that since 2008(arguably 2004) the winning coalition has been squarely in the Democrat's camp and in order fro Republicans to win they need to appeal to Democratic voters, which I know is obvious, but perhaps a recession or fuck up blamed on Democrats wont be enough for Republicans to win back control of the White House.
Sorry for this somewhat long winded post and if I rambled on a bit to much lol. I mostly lurk here and post every now and then. anyway its just an observation I made feel free to argue it.
Still early
plagiarize
Banned
This meant something very different to me than I think you intended.
#PurgeElectionYear
As I understand it, it's never taken over as much as the convention center since then either. Heck, I don't know they ever want it to get that big again, given their intentional downsizing the following year.
excelsiorlef
Member
Weaver is shady and a total scumbag. Ugh.
andthebeatgoeson
Junior Member
He probably mispoke and was thinking of a MAC machine.
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...it-so-we-thought-Daily-Kos-could-help-him-out
It's a shame that the Donald's a White nationalist, cause otherwise he's a pretty entertaining dude.
User 463088
Banned
Is it scary that I wasn't entirely sure if this was going to be about Bernie or Trump until yuo mentioned the white nationalist part. Have Queen or Bernie made statements on the Brexit? I wonder if this is another one of those things Bernie hasn't thought about since he's running for President.
Wolf Blitzer: "We now project Donald Trump will be the next President of the Unites States."
Wallach: "Thanks, Obama!"
User 463088
Banned
jack_package_200
Banned
Venezuela's Maduro rooting for 'revolutionary friend' Sanders in US campaign
https://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/W...olutionary-friend-sanders-in-us-campaign.ashx
Threadworthy endorsement?
https://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/W...olutionary-friend-sanders-in-us-campaign.ashx
Threadworthy endorsement?
eBay Huckster
Member
I was unironically gonna fill that out, but then I remembered I'm a straight MIXED male so I'm still allowed to vote.
jack_package_200
Banned
I can't.
There have been a few recent polls only showing a 2 point difference in CA, which is odd because of how big the gap was in previous polling (14 points). I expect Hillary to win by 10, but kinda unsure now
plagiarize
Banned
It's not his first time slipping up on a tautology.
jack_package_200
Banned
eBay Huckster
Member
She's winning by 10, the 14-17 point margin is already baked in
shinra-bansho
Member
So basically... white men find Trump more favorable.
Nope. No surprises.
Oh, I didn't realise the table was cut off. But there it is at the bottom.
plagiarize
Banned
I keep telling you it's going to be close. So say the demographics models, and they've generally been better than the polls throughout this (calling the so called 'upsets' pretty much on the nose).
Thequietone
Member
Sister in-law just voted for the Queen in Cali. So that's 3+ for her here. She was always going to vote for her but Sanders' actions the last few days has sealed her decision.
Bam Bam Baklava
Member
Who cares? The race is over by then.
eBay Huckster
Member
(but actually she's winning by somewhere in single digits, e-day voting is gonna be a mess)
Hexa
Member
All the KH games except for the mobile/DS games are great. KH2 and BBS are god tier. I have no doubt KH3 will be great.
FF has had a lot of lackluster main line entries recently but FFXIV is supposedly great and Theatrhythm is pretty good. Older games are still excellent, especially FFVII. We'll see what happens with FFXV and FFVII:Re.
Retromelon
Member
hugh hewitt is a lulzy, lulzy man. I am in love with his perpetual trollface expression
StopMakingSense
Member
All the benchmarks are around +8 today?
Dominican Power
Member
hugh hewitt is a lulzy, lulzy man. I am in love with his perpetual trollface expression
He's a buffoon.
Those damn minorities.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked