Bernie just gave a reaction to the San Jose violence:
https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/738900282440962048
Kudos Bernie for a legitimately good response.
Bernie just gave a reaction to the San Jose violence:
https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/738900282440962048
This thread is a great read. Just replace Obama with Hillary and Hillary with Bernie and it fits really well.
2016 version
Becerra or Perez would be the first non-Senator Vice Presidential picks for the Democratic Party since Geraldine Ferraro in 1984 (she was a representative). This was from pressure from the DNC to pick a woman for the pick, including voices like House Speaker Tip O'Neal. Before that, Sargent Shriver in 1972 (who achieved national recognition for implementing and orchestrating many of Lyndon Johnson's Great Society programs like the Peace Corps). And before that, you have to go all the way back to FDR's first vice president, John Nance Garner. His qualifications? He was Speaker of the House.I still think Warren's a good choice, but I'm also a fan of Perez, Becerra, or Klobuchar before Kaine. I have nothing against the guy, but I just think he's a relatively safe and boring pick.
It's a fine answer until he says anyone who is violent should be quiet about who they support.Bernie just gave a reaction to the San Jose violence:
https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/738900282440962048
Did we have a dedicated thread for this?Some NeoGAF reactions to Hillary's concession speech/endorsement of Obama (each line is a new post from a different user):
The question is, will Sanders give an inspiring speech encouraging his followers to give their full support to Clinton? I'm skeptical.
Agreed. I'm not opposed per se, but I think he's a dumb pick.To be clear, I'm not opposed to Kaine.
I just think he's a boring pick.
To be clear, I'm not opposed to Kaine.
I just think he's a boring pick.
I would argue that him being so conventional is more of a problem this year. He's a former DNC Chair. He's totally establishment. Someone slightly outside the DNC Establishment would, I think be a good play.
What southern or midwestern Democrat would she be able to pick? It's either going to be the northeast or the west coast. The dynamics are different this year.I'm just worried about getting a solid, qualified person who will help in a state that will ensure victory in that role. I'm not worried about sexy picks. Politics shouldn't be sexy.
Bernie just gave a reaction to the San Jose violence:
https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/738900282440962048
Did we have a dedicated thread for this?
I'm just worried about getting a solid, qualified person who will help in a state that will ensure victory in that role. I'm not worried about sexy picks. Politics shouldn't be sexy.
Newsome has Skeletons in his closet and also plans to run for governor in 2018.What southern or midwestern Democrat would she be able to pick? It's either going to be the northeast or the west coast. The dynamics are different this year.
What's going on with Gavin Newsom these days?
What kind of skeletons?Newsome has Skeletons in his closet and also plans to run for governor in 2018.
What kind of skeletons?
What kind of skeletons?
I'm so cynical at this point that this is how I read it the first time. I hate myself. Fortunately I think better of him than that and for a chance he's being pretty firm about it. Good.Sanders tells followers to hide their support for him when they engage in violence.
No, seriously.the spooky kind
I'm not honestly sure, but whenever I see him mentioned, I always hear about shady things from his past. I also don't think picking a lt governor as a running mate is a great idea.What kind of skeletons?
Hopefully the gay kind, especially if they were in the closet. I used to have a huge crush on him.
Gay skeletons in his closet? I don't know how I feel about that.
I don't buy the whole Warren VP pick.
I just don't see it as necessary, the bridge to the far left will naturally build itself by November despite people moaning now.
I would love Barnie as vp, but I really don't think this country would vote for a woman and a gay vp. Then again I never thought we would have a black president in my lifetime lol.
Hillary Clinton’s blistering new assault on Donald J. Trump has mollified many Democrats alarmed about the closer-than-expected presidential race — while inflaming Republican fears that Mr. Trump’s improvisational style and skeletal campaign will prove inadequate in repelling the type of attack Mrs. Clinton unleashed on Thursday.
...
For several weeks, Mrs. Clinton had tried out a version of the campaign President Obama ran against Mitt Romney in 2012, portraying Mr. Trump as a heartless corporate titan who profited off the housing crisis and avoided paying taxes. But she was receiving scant news media coverage, and Mrs. Clinton’s advisers worried that voters were not as moved by class-based attacks against someone who unapologetically boasts about his wealth.
After weeks in which Mr. Trump viciously attacked Mrs. Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, over Mr. Clinton’s indiscretions, moreover, it had become clear that she needed a circuit breaker in the form of a more robust counterassault — and one that she could deliver herself, rather than relying on surrogates to deal the most forceful blows to Mr. Trump on her behalf.
Her campaign’s decision was to seek to disqualify Mr. Trump on terrain that is Mrs. Clinton’s comfort zone: foreign policy. But billing her San Diego speech on Thursday as a foreign policy address was also something of a ruse: It turned out to be an acidly funny takedown of Mr. Trump and his temperament, giving him the same sort of belittling treatment he had used on his opponents to great effect.
...
Some Democrats said she could negatively define Mr. Trump this summer the same way that Mr. Clinton managed to define Bob Dole in their 1996 presidential race.
“What she did sets the parameters about what this election is about,” said Joe Lockhart, who was Mr. Clinton’s campaign press secretary that year. “It is very hard to change that in the day-to-day fight after Labor Day.”
That prospect, in turn, has Republicans deeply concerned about Mr. Trump.
Despite being the party’s presumptive nominee for a month, Mr. Trump has yet to adapt his campaign to the demands of a general election. His only “war room” so far is his Twitter feed. He is campaigning in California, insisting that he can win one of the country’s most liberal states. He has spent a week attacking a Hispanic federal judge who is handling a lawsuit against him in increasingly racial terms, only drawing more attention to the case. And he continues to divide his attention: He will travel to Scotland and Ireland this month for a business event.
Nor have Mr. Trump’s tactical choices inspired confidence. At a rally on Thursday night in San Jose, Calif., his main rejoinder to Mrs. Clinton’s speech was that she ought to be in jail over her use of a private email account as secretary of state. There was no broader counterattack from his campaign or his allies, a remarkable silence after Mrs. Clinton’s harshest critique yet.
Damn he sounds like a fun guy. He's who we need. He's the opposite of Hillary
Yeah Gavin fucking blew it. The danger of having everybody tell you you're the sexiest mayor alive.
He'll be a fine governor of California and maybe in ten or twenty years he can think about running for president.
This seems like some sort of weird masochism.Catching some Real Time
God damn I fucking hate Bill Maher, and NDT doesn't look happy either (they are talking about GMO, anti-science on the left)
This seems like some sort of weird masochism.
I literally never watch it, but I'm popping some melatonin and trying to get to bed so I can pick up a new car tomorrow, so I got caught channel surfing and remembered why I stopped watching Real Time after I graduated high school.
What southern or midwestern Democrat would she be able to pick? It's either going to be the northeast or the west coast. The dynamics are different this year.
What's going on with Gavin Newsom these days?
The best thing about this speech is that it does what Obama was able to do to Romney in '12 and establishes a narrative that your opponent unwittingly plays into.
She defined him as an immature hothead. A big, screaming manchild. And all she had to do was highlight his own words.
His tweets and rants don't look tough anymore. He looks like a child throwing a fit.
Also, the pacing of the speech was perfect. She made sure to attack him first, and then, only later, did she admit that he would probably be bitching on Twitter. And he was! As soon as she said that, he stopped tweeting for the time being.
The best thing about this speech is that it does what Obama was able to do to Romney in '12 and establishes a narrative that your opponent unwittingly plays into.
She defined him as an immature hothead. A big, screaming manchild. And all she had to do was highlight his own words.
His tweets and rants don't look tough anymore. He looks like a child throwing a fit.
I've thought of the man as a cartoon CEO as well, since last year. Glad to see this!! Dude is toast.That was the highlight of the speech for me. That he was shooting out tweets right at the moment when she predicted he would be made him seem like a damn cartoon character.
He's the biggest whiner, the most fabulous whiner. He loves whining. He keeps whining and whining until he wins.I watched his interview with Jake Tapper of all people (the one where he said "He's a Mexican" and "I think his race does have something to do with it")and Trump really came across as defensive and whiny. I mean, his voice was whiny, the total opposite of how he is at his rallies.