Ahh, so her excuse is the "revolution" couldn't bother to get out and vote because they were sad/mad, meanwhile Clinton voters still managed to vote despite having no reason to either?
"The supers didn't' vote yet!!!"
"They declared Obama the
presumptive nominee eight years ago"
"AP announced it last night!"
"I agree that was stupid, however the Clinton campaign probably didn't want that as it would more likely fuck over her turnout considering she had already clinched the nomination via press."
"AP and Clinton colluded to suppress voter turnout because they already had it pre-planned!"
"Every major news organization already has pre-made announcements or templates for events that are coming down the pipe, just like how they have pre-made graphics and headlines for whoever wins the Superbowl. You only have a limited number of events, Sanders upset causes chaos or Clinton wins."
"MSM declared the nominee, they were always against Sanders they are just in it for money"
"MSM always wants to get the most viewers, how would "Clinton is the nominee Sanders is not" narrative help them for over a year, and did you not watch MSM for the last few months when every contest was a horse race and how the nomination was in questions magically after Trump clinched his?"
I can't reason with her, everything goes back to conspiracy alt-left shit. Monsanto is killing the world and want to control all food supplies. GMO's will give you cancer (smokes two packs a day). The dogs will die if we try and make our lawn not look like shit every year (smokes two packs a day directly in front of the dogs). She constantly contradicts her own reasoning by ignore the real world examples that directly counter what ever argument she is making.
