Ugh, now people think the AP calling the race early had something to do with Bernie losing. I don't know why they care - you didn't believe it anyway!
Speaking of which, I posted on social media that I'm excited that we are having the first female Presidential nominee in history and someone just has to comment on it "she's not a good candidate. Voting third party." Someone else saying "it isn't over until July." Like.. let me be excited. I didn't post to have a discussion. I didn't post to have an argument. I just posted a celebration for having the first female Presidential nominee in history. Why is this such a bad thing to them? I don't do this to their posts when people talk about Bernie..
/endrant
Eh, the man is going to go to the convention.
Make his claims/demands, call for more influence then immediately concede regardless of the outcome claiming a moral victory just for limping to the convention. Diablosing is fun and all but I'd wager the truth will likely be much more dull than we imagine.
I've done a number of statistical analysises in CA election results and they just don't make any sense. Yup, CA was yet another site of massive election fraud. I am now taking a hard line approach. Sanders needs to run third party. At a bare minimum, Hillary cannot be allowed to win the presidency. Her corruption and control of the MSM will guarantee that this country dies a quiet, unreported death. Can you imagine people questioning "President Hillary" and being called a sexist? Don't worry. It's coming if she wins. Hillary is quite literally, the most vile candidate in recent history. A Trump victory is a quick flame out. A Hillary victory is a nuclear explosion detonated underground - where we find out 8 years later the drinking water is no longer safe to drink.
It may not be impossible for a woman to win the presidency the way we are used to men doing it, but it is unlikely. The way a woman is likeliest to win will defy our expectations.
Perhaps that's why we don't appreciate Clinton's strengths as a candidate. She's winning a process that evolved to showcase stereotypically male traits using a stereotypically female strategy.
And it's working.
But another way to look at the primary is that Clinton employed a less masculine strategy to win. She won the Democratic primary by spending years slowly, assiduously, building relationships with the entire Democratic Party. She relied on a more traditionally female approach to leadership: creating coalitions, finding common ground, and winning over allies. Today, 523 governors and members of Congress have endorsed Clinton; 13 have endorsed Sanders.
This work is a grind it's not big speeches, it doesn't come with wide applause, and it requires an emotional toughness most human beings can't summon.
But Clinton is arguably better at that than anyone in American politics today. In 2000, she won a Senate seat that meant serving amidst Republicans who had destroyed her health care bill and sought to impeach her husband. And she kept her head down, found common ground, and won them over.
"We have become, actually, good friends," said Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, who served as one of the Republican prosecutors during impeachment. "And that was a surprise to both of us." (It is perhaps not coincidental that Graham is one of the few elected Republicans now calling on his fellow Republicans to retract their endorsements of Donald Trump.)
And Clinton isn't just better she's relentless. After losing to Barack Obama, she rebuilt those relationships, campaigning hard for him in the general, serving as his secretary of state, reaching out to longtime allies who had crushed her campaign by endorsing him over her. (This, by the way, is why I don't think you can dismiss Clinton's victory as reflections of her husband's success: She's won her own elections and secured a major appointment in a subsequent administration.)
Now Obama says that Clinton "had a tougher job throughout that primary than I did. She had to do everything that I had to do, except, like Ginger Rogers, backwards in heels." It's been clear since early in the primary that he is firmly in her corner, and his endorsement is believed to be imminent.
In this telling, in order to do something as hard as becoming the first female presidential nominee of a major political party, she had to do something extraordinarily difficult: She had to build a coalition, supported by a web of relationships, that dwarfed in both breadth and depth anything a non-incumbent had created before. It was a plan that played to her strengths, as opposed to her (entirely male) challengers' strengths. And she did it.
Hillary Clinton is a generationally talented politician albeit across a different set of dimensions than men tend to be talented politicians.
When she lost in 2008, Clinton said that after her campaign, it would no longer be remarkable to see women win presidential primaries and nearly win their party's nomination. But no women did it in 2012, and she was the only woman to do it in 2016. It is still not easy, and it is still not unremarkable, for a woman to succeed in presidential politics. Clinton's victory is a remarkable achievement, and it shouldn't be dismissed.
Sanders will play the last card up his sleeve: releasing his tax returns.
Lol. You know things are starting to turn around when Hillary headlines read "Hillary gets emotional" and not "Hillary appears to get emotional".Might have been posted.
https://twitter.com/GMA/status/740502224200044545
WATCH: @HillaryClinton gets emotional as she looks out over cheering crowd before her speech with @DavidMuir.
So there's this interesting take from Ezra Klein at Vox about Hillary, that goes against what everyone, even her seem to agree on, that she's not a very talented politician.
I'm not sure I agree with all of it, it tends to gloss over the demographics of the race, but it's an interesting read nonetheless.
So how many of HillaryGAF 08 cried last night?
Might have been posted.
https://twitter.com/GMA/status/740502224200044545
WATCH: @HillaryClinton gets emotional as she looks out over cheering crowd before her speech with @DavidMuir.
So how many of HillaryGAF 08 cried last night?
So how many of HillaryGAF 08 cried last night?
Good article. People forgot that Hillary went toe-to-toe with arguably one of the greatest politicians in decades and only lost narrowly in 2008. She is a skilled politician, but I think she's just skilled primarily in ways that most people don't instantly and unanimously associated with being talented.
So how many of HillaryGAF 08 cried last night?
Lol. You know things are starting to turn around when Hillary headlines read "Hillary gets emotional" and not "Hillary appears to get emotional".
As time approaches infinity, Tyler approaches infalliabilityCongrats to Tyler on correctly calling 4 out of 6 winners last night, with as little as a 6-point miss in New Mexico! (Wrong winner though. Also the 34-point miss in SD.. and the 22-point miss in MT. And the 11-point miss in NJ.)
Hmm, I'm not sure she is fit to be President, when she turns into such a cry baby so fast.
Also, she's totally faking it.
Congratulations Hillary on such a historic moment.
I voted for Sanders in the NY democratic primary because I really liked what Sanders has been preaching. I hadn't ever seen myself going out there and knocking on doors, going to rally, and being politically active. At a time in my life where I was feeling especially down on my luck, he gave me a cause that I was passionate about and fighted for. I am really grateful that in my lifetime I was going out there and supporting a candidate who really felt like they were speaking directly to me.
At first, I was drinking the kool-aid how it was rigged against him, fraud, superdelegates etc. As the time went on and he didn't drop out and get behind Hillary for the general election, he basically threw the monopoly board off the table and my view of him really started to sink. It's like he didnt care that what he was doing was trying to bring Hillary down with him. Eventually, I stopped telling people I supported Sanders and stopped defending him because his campaign turned to a complete mess. I didn't want to back a sore loser.
Eight years ago I originally wanted to vote for Hillary. I thought she was a really inspiring woman and I wanted a woman as president of the US. When she dropped it, I was fullt behind Obama. I couldn't vote, though.
This November I will proudly vote for Hillary Clinton. She's not perfect. She needs to rethink some of her policies, like legalizing marijuana (no, not just because I like getting high but because it's just another way to put black men behind bars). I'd also really like single payer healthcare, but it doesn't seem like its plasuble at the moment. I viewed Obama fairly positively and I will be happy to see her continue Obama's legacy. One thing though, I don't care about the email thing. But why did she have her own email server in her house unprotected? As a techie guy, I just think it was really dumb. If I was a politician you'd bet I'd make sure I was doing everything by the book because my life is so public.
Nevertheless,
#ImWitHer
someone pls respond
Who cares? Yall seem to be the salty ones with the 'fall in line' mentality. I majority of the Sanders supporters knows Hillary already won. I find it funny he/them just don't care and are still going regardless. It's at least commendable. His speech at the DNC is going to be interesting.
It's up to Hillary to win the GE and if she some how lost it, its probably the biggest failure of any candidate in history. After all, she was the most electable, right?
someone pls respond
There is exactly zero chance Clinton won California by 13 points. Zero. I warned you this was coming when the exit polls were canceled, then MSNBC said a week early they would call it after NJ, and ‪#‎HillBought‬ announced her victory.
This is why exit polls were cancelled. That result is outrageous.
Hang on, people, the extent of the fraud is now beyond what any thinking person can accept.
There are people doing exit polls. It will be very interesting to see what they have to say.
See you in a 3-way race in November. Thanks for guaranteeing it today, you corrupt, disgusting, plutocratic traitors.
You just guaranteed change.
Don't evenBiiiiiiitch please.
How did your job interview go?
Must be nice to be in a situation where the potential loss of others' rights and livelihoods is a fun sketch to watch.
someone pls respond
I did my best. It was a group interview and I think the other people were more qualified than I was. But I gave it a shot. Thanks for asking
Show me how Sanders is hurting Hillary.
I did my best. It was a group interview and I think the other people were more qualified than I was. But I gave it a shot. Thanks for asking
Man, that big California loss, though irrelevant in terms of math, really fucked him right in his narrative and put the damaged Clinton concern stories to rest this morning.
"Show me on the doll where Bernie touched you."Show me how Sanders is hurting Hillary.
As irrelevant as it is in the long run, this is why I wanted Hillary to get a big win in California. I didn't want Bernie to be able to claim momentum.
"Show me on the doll where Bernie touched you."
Let he who is without salt toss the first shakerWho cares? Yall seem to be the salty ones with the 'fall in line' mentality. I majority of the Sanders supporters knows Hillary already won. I find it funny he/them just don't care and are still going regardless. It's at least commendable. His speech at the DNC is going to be interesting.
It's up to Hillary to win the GE and if she some how lost it, its probably the biggest failure of any candidate in history. After all, she was the most electable, right?
Show me how Sanders is hurting Hillary.
Watching the people in the primaries, it was interesting seeing them gradually come to the realization that Sanders was a shitty candidate. Dude had an amazing populist message, so long as you didn't delve any deeper than the surface, or just bought into his message. I had my first qualms about him early on when foreign policy was the topic in the debates. He was also so quick to pivot back to his stump speech rather than give any type of substantive answer to a question. People waved that away just saying he was introducing himself to the country and getting his message out there.
I knew.
It's almost like people were in some type of coma and woke up several months later and have no recollection of the events. I've seen some very confused individuals wondering how or why they bought into Sanders' message so completely. It is all almost cult like in its effectiveness.
What are you going out for? Just because someone's more qualified doesn't mean they're going to be a better fit. Given it's a group interview they likely wanted to see how you performed in a social setting, which means that was likely an important factor.
Final results For CA were 55.8% and 43.2%.
She netted like 69 I think.
It was for a non-profit. And I'm not too good about being social. Oh well...
Welcome aboard. I was behind Hillary in 2008 and I was crushed when she lost. I happily voted Obama and he has been a generationally consequential president.someone pls respond
Yeah, those tax returns are never coming out.