The most immediate remedy that must be considered for misconduct so blatant and with adverse consequences of such magnitude is the striking of the partys pleadings. While perhaps an appropriate sanction, as this Court has expressed in prior proceedings and opinions (and despite the overwhelming grounds to do so), it will not strike the Governments pleadings. In a different situation, this Court might very well have taken that action. This egregious conduct merits it. While this Court has that power (both pursuant to the Rules and under its inherent power), the fact that a federal court might have a power does not mean that court should necessarily exercise it. The national importance of the outcome of this litigation outweighs the benefits to be gained by implementing the ultimate sanction. The citizens of this country and those non-citizens who may be affected by the 2014 DHS Directive deserve an answer and should not be deprived of that answer due to the misconduct of counsel. Further, the Supreme Court has decided to weigh in on these matters. Striking the Governments pleadings would not only be unfair to the litigants, but also unfair, and perhaps even disrespectful, to the Supreme Court as it would deprive that Court of the ability to thrash out the legal issues in this case. Regardless of how unprofessional the DOJs conduct may have been, this Court will not strike the Governments pleadings.