Why should I refute your point? I don't disagree with it, and it's not relevant to the discussion.
Relax, bro. I love Gabe, too. I'm not besmirching his honor. Put down the torch.
Your comment was that a third party retailer had "
stole", your word, revenue from Valve during a sale. I gave clear evidence showing that apparently wasn't a concern to Gabe, as of that interview that is, and that there was no evidence that his views or the direction of Valve had changed in that regard due to that direction being no longer economically viable. Clearly a motive beyond pure profits is the basis for their actions, and/or that MORE profits come by maintaining a more open system to begin with.
Let me break it down. And I mean that honestly, because I really feel like this is a very simple concept, but apparently I'm not explaining it well.
Customer A uses Steam.
Customer B does not use Steam.
Scenario A: Valve leads off quarterly sales by being the first to market with their sales.
Customer A buys the game on Steam, Customer B does not see the sale on Steam, buys the game on Amazon, GMG, or another, and becomes a Steam user.
User Gained: 1
Sales Made: 1
Scenario B: Valve is the last to market with a quarterly sale.
Customer A buys the game he wants when he sees it on a steep sale on another site. Customer Be does the same, and becomes a Steam user.
User Gained: 1
Sales Made: 0
Does that make things clearer? Or are we going to again ignore this very simple concept and launch into another hyperbole driven rebuttal about how I supposedly think the sky is falling, Gaben is dying, and Steam is no longer economically viable.
If they were so concerned with competing with other retailers, then why do they give away free keys to the developers/publishers to sell on those sites or directly? Why are they not taxing them? So apparently Valve
should see the loss of these sales during special promotions as adversely impacting them to a degree that
should change the basic direction of how Steam approaches other digital sales and retailers? I don't even believe you understood or knew about what Gabe commented on before I posted it, else you might have acknowledged the rational response one might assume Valve would have towards the promotions of other retailers, which would be to not really care at all. You have no evidence to assume it would or should be otherwise.
There have been no torches here... Hello, exaggerated hyperbole, we meet again.