OmegaSupreme
advanced basic bitch
He's deeply offended by this. This is the first time this has happened in the history of consoles.
He's deeply offended by this. This is the first time this has happened in the history of consoles.
I think we’re still waiting on Sony’s response to: The fuck you thinking with Concord?Let's see if they reply.
Be it some phantom deal or technical issues, there's little doubt it's eventually coming.I hope it comes out for Xbox. The game is fantastic, like a mix of God of War (old and new), souls games, a bit of Ninja Gaiden Black, but at the same time being it's own thing.
Hmm? I guess.. but still doesn't help them much to have a game exclusive to their system while it is having performance issues; and they can't/won't even advertise. If people are really bothered by the game being exclusive, then just get it on PS5 (the ones complaining the loudest here seem to have both systems so....)they just want to mess with Xbox. that is the only explanation. they didn't even bother to make the physical editon.
OR
sony knew the performance was not very good and they are wating for the PS5 Pro to start the marketing.
Black Myth: Wukong's delay on Xbox is due to an exclusivity deal with Sony, a knowledgeable source has told IGN, corroborating reporting on Forbes as well as what IGN has heard elsewhere.If they have the same source then this corroborates nothing.
it helps them in the sense that it's the only console the game is available.Hmm? I guess.. but still doesn't help them much to have a game exclusive to their system while it is having performance issues that you can't really advertise.
If there was a deal, they wouldn't be working with them to get it out on their platform."We’re excited for the launch of Black Myth Wukong on Xbox Series X|S and are working with Game Science to bring the game to our platforms,"
Black Myth: Wukong's delay on Xbox is due to an exclusivity deal with Sony, a knowledgeable source has told IGN, corroborating reporting on Forbes as well as what IGN has heard elsewhere.
"corroborating reporting on Forbes as well as what IGN has heard elsewhere"
That's two different sources saying the same thing, I'm not a betting man but this ain't looking good for Sony.
VS the devs and extas1s so 2 sources vs 2 sources...But one is the dev of said game....Black Myth: Wukong's delay on Xbox is due to an exclusivity deal with Sony, a knowledgeable source has told IGN, corroborating reporting on Forbes as well as what IGN has heard elsewhere.
"corroborating reporting on Forbes as well as what IGN has heard elsewhere"
That's two different sources saying the same thing, I'm not a betting man but this ain't looking good for Sony.
It is looking good for Sony. It was a smart deal. It's selling millions and moving consoles. Just like good exclusives do.Black Myth: Wukong's delay on Xbox is due to an exclusivity deal with Sony, a knowledgeable source has told IGN, corroborating reporting on Forbes as well as what IGN has heard elsewhere.
"corroborating reporting on Forbes as well as what IGN has heard elsewhere"
That's two different sources saying the same thing, I'm not a betting man but this ain't looking good for Sony.
I don't think that's ever stopped them. Rebirth looks like a blurry mess on performance mode and Rise of the Ronin looked very dated and the framerate is terrible, but that didn't stop them from marketing the shit out of both. Whoever says that Sony isn't advertising the game because it's not technically great is crazy.Hmm? I guess.. but still doesn't help them much to have a game exclusive to their system while it is having performance issues that you can't really advertise.
Yeah, sorry, I mean that part was clear to me but the game having perf issues on their box does not look good, exclusive or not. So, if they do have exclusivity, might as well advertise it. The game is getting good word of mouth and seems to be a good game.it helps them in the sense that it's the only console the game is available.
"Dont talk about feminism or chapter 2 or winnie the pooh."VS the devs and extas1s so 2 sources vs 2 sources...But one is the dev of said game....
It's exclusive on ps5 right now. You're point was why are they not marketing it?
Why spend money on marketing it when nvidia is doing it for you and you've paid so a platform doesn't have the game.
Market for who? What's rhe point in spending the marketing money when you've spent it on removing the xbox version like 2 months before launch.
Fucking dirty, man.
Really, really shady
Why isn't it looking good for Sony?Black Myth: Wukong's delay on Xbox is due to an exclusivity deal with Sony, a knowledgeable source has told IGN, corroborating reporting on Forbes as well as what IGN has heard elsewhere.
"corroborating reporting on Forbes as well as what IGN has heard elsewhere"
That's two different sources saying the same thing, I'm not a betting man but this ain't looking good for Sony.
That's probably a ref but I don't get it, sorry."Dont talk about feminism or chapter 2 or winnie the pooh."
It is looking good for Sony. It was a smart deal. It's selling millions and moving consoles. Just like good exclusives do.
He's deeply offended by this. This is the first time this has happened in the history of consoles.
This is a bit like telling you believe in the power of generations, to then release only cross-platform games. Or not disclosing an exclusive as temporary from the beginning. Pretty shady communication amirite ?You know what else is shady? Telling your fanbase only 4 of your exclusive games going to playstation when you well know more than 4 were coming. But nope, ms is never shady amirite?
That's two different sources saying the same thing, I'm not a betting man but this ain't looking good for Sony.
Or forbidding to mention competition on multiplatform games for a period of time right ?This is a bit like telling you believe in the power of generations, to then release only cross-platform games. Or not disclosing an exclusive as temporary from the beginning. Pretty shady communication amirite ?
They're referring to Forbes, saying they've heard the same thing but from someone else. So even if Tassi is one source, there's another one also.Maybe. Could be the same source talking to IGN and Tassi. Thought that was what you meant when you said "Unless they're using the same source"
A bit too much of a coincidence that IGN and Tassi get new info from two different sources at the same exact time.
Or announcing games as console exclusive to then port all of them on PC, right ?Or forbidding to mention competition on multiplatform games for a period of time right ?
Complete 180, I have to admire your ballsIt is looking good for Sony. It was a smart deal. It's selling millions and moving consoles. Just like good exclusives do.
So if GC was lying about the memory leak. Why didn't Xbox respond on that issue in the media?
You must be trolling at this point. You can't be real on this.
IGN isn't a source.
This is a bit like telling you believe in the power of generations, to then release only cross-platform games. Or not disclosing an exclusive as temporary from the beginning. Pretty shady communication amirite ?
"We have always said that we believe in generations. We believe that when you go to all the trouble of creating a next-gen console, that it should include features and benefits that the previous generation does not include. And that, in our view, people should make games that can make the most of those features.
Well I certainly don't want the shitty PS5 port of this game on my Xbox so it's a win for me at least.Proving there's a deal isn't the win you think it is.
But they did say it was for optimisations and that they were doing all they can to minimize the wait ...How do you do that when there's a deal ?GC didn't say anything about any memory leaks.
You know what I meant. IGN has one or more separate sources from Tassi saying the same thing.
They're referring to Forbes, saying they've heard the same thing but from someone else. So even if Tassi is one source, there's another one also.
That's like only reading a catchy title and not the article. Don't know how many times it has to be said, but you're wrong about cross-gen stuff. They literally say it in the same article they'll be supporting PS4 still.This is a bit like telling you believe in the power of generations, to then release only cross-platform games. Or not disclosing an exclusive as temporary from the beginning. Pretty shady communication amirite ?
The generations thing was about the features of next-gen."We have always felt that we had a responsibility to serve that [PS4] community for several years after the launch of PS5 and that it represented a huge business opportunity for us," Ryan says. "The numbers are quite straightforward. If you say in broad brush figures that we have a community of 100 million PS4 owners right now, and in the first couple of years... I don't know, somewhere between 15 and 25 million might migrate to PS5, that still leaves a huge number of people with PS4s. And that community is demonstrating an amazing stickiness, and willingness to stay engaged that, I think, the events of the past few months have just reinforced what we knew already.
Now let's never bring that shit up again."We have always said that we believe in generations. We believe that when you go to all the trouble of creating a next-gen console, that it should include features and benefits that the previous generation does not include. And that, in our view, people should make games that can make the most of those features.
"We do believe in generations, and whether it's the DualSense controller, whether it's the 3D audio, whether it's the multiple ways that the SSD can be used... we are thinking that it is time to give the PlayStation community something new, something different, that can really only be enjoyed on PS5."
How would they know they have a separate source?You know what I meant. IGN has one or more separate sources from Tassi saying the same thing.
What?Complete 180, I have to admire your balls
Lack of anyone who understands games or how to manage/grow IP. I am not kidding. When you look at the timed exclusives they secured this gen, most of them are either middling-to-bad games (think shit like The Gunk or The Medium) or they are great games that are locked behind ineffectual agreements (Like a Dragon having an exclusive next-gen version for 6 months, or STALKER 2 having less than a year's exclusivity clause). When they do luck into a genuine hit they still manage to not make it rain for the rest of their line-up (see Palworld being a success on Gamepass and barely netting MS anything in profit despite being a Steam mega-hit).I dont understand how MS has $70 billion to buy activision, $8 billion to buy Zenimax, $3 billion to buy Minecraft, but lost timed exclusives to Sony for the following games:
- Black Myth
- Genshin Impact
- Stellar Blade
- FF16
- FF7 Rebirth
- Forspoken
- FF7 Remake
- Rise of Ronin
- Nioh 1 & Nioh 2
- Death Stranding 1 & 2 - Remember Sony signed kojima to a 2 game deal literally the year MS closed the Minecraft deal.
- Kojima's next game
Any time Sony gets an L, Microsoft scrambles to surround it with 5 L's of its own.
This is why Sony gets to coast along.
Now it's actually good for Sony apparently, no shitty deal is bad enough when you're a shill it seems.The only people that will end up looking bad are the Sony faithful that insist deals like this arent real. It shows (if true) that they were clueless.
Everyone does timed deals. Personally I'm fine waiting.
The only other people that look bad are the press. If this was on Xbox 1st they'd badger everyone until they found out how many months its exclusive. We already know Stalker 2 is 3 months and its not even out yet. They are just now finally getting around to trying to ask questions here which is a good thing.
Something something sour grapes.Well I certainly don't want the shitty PS5 port of this game on my Xbox so it's a win for me at least.
Well I certainly don't want the shitty PS5 port of this game on my Xbox so it's a win for me at least.
Heard elsewhere, is that not clear enough?Not saying that isn't a possibility, but IGN said their source corroborated the "reporting" made by Forbes. They didn't say "someone else". How would IGN know who Forbes' source is?
Not saying you are wrong. Saying we don't know.
That's like only reading a catchy title and not the article. Don't know how many times it has to be said, but you're wrong about cross-gen stuff. They literally say it in the same article they'll be supporting PS4 still.
The generations thing was about the features of next-gen.
Now let's never bring that shit up again.