Support NeoGAF

[AntraxSuicide]

No really, women are 51% of voters. This is going to be incredibly easy.

Liberals panic way too much.

I agree. Nothing about this election looks good for the GOP. They're doing worse than 2012 with most groups, including white people because that vote share is going down. It's a lost cause for them with Trump on the ticket.

 

[Spoiled Milk]

in other news did you Californians send in your ballot for Queen yet?

I just received mine. Can't you let me survive finals first?

 

[whyamihere]

I mean, this is going to be really easy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6vMGqX58Ww



https://twitter.com/drvox/status/730115899890356224

White women LOVE Diana, too.

 

[Fenderputty]

17-65. That's some damn evidence.

Maybe they'll get to 30 wins this year.

The possibilities are endless.

So when we present you with evidence that there's less than a 50/50 shot that Clinton will be indicted, you act like that's not the case because there's only two scenarios that could come out of an FBI investigation and because they investigated it must mean something. However when I say the Lakers have a 50/50 shot to win the championship between the two choices of "win" or "not win" I should listen to your evidence that one is more likely than the other?

I would say there's a 50/50 shot you'll follow what I'm saying but ... lol

 

[studyguy]

I put mine in the same day. I think my parents did yesterday?
Either way, not worried about it.

 

[FloydtheFathead]

There's a 50/50 shot the Lakers are going to win the Championship next year. Black Mamba will be happy to know this.

Everytime I hear a Laker fan whine.. I want to kick them in the damn shin.

They are going to get Ben Simmons and you'll be better and then they'll be happy.

God, I hope he picks Newt for VP.

I really think he will.

 

[Spoiled Milk]

Wow. Gingrich is already up at 28 cents on predict it. It can't be him! I don't believe it!

 

[Box of Kittens]

I base 100% of my political opinions on how many beers I'd have with a politician.

The answer is clearly Biden.

 

[thezerofire]

here we go again with the FBI.

in other news did you Californians send in your ballot for Queen yet?

not yet, need to get some time to look through everything still

 

[Fenderputty]

Everytime I hear a Laker fan whine.. I want to kick them in the damn shin.

They are going to get Ben Simmons and you'll be better and then they'll be happy.

This is funny to me right now because we have an almost exact 50/50 shot at keeping our pick (though less so in the top 1-2)

 

[ItWasMeantToBe19]

This is going to be really easy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOngXNm8CSs

 

[NYCmetsfan]

go back to NBA gaf.

 

[Godslay]

So when we present you with evidence that there's less than a 50/50 shot that Clinton will be indicted, you act like that's not the case because there's only two scenarios that could come out of an FBI investigation and because they investigated it must mean something. However when I say the Lakers have a 50/50 shot to win the championship between the two choices of "win" or "not win" I should listen to your evidence that one is more likely than the other?

Look we all know that the Lakers are garbage. The evidence is abundantly clear on that. That hardly needs an investigation.

Just like we know that housing classified data on a private server is illegal. Not to mention why was the server even created in the first place? Aside from supposed convenience? Has anyone answered that?

Is Hillary going to be indicted? I don't know. I think it can go either way. Yet, because you and others don't agree with that it's now a running joke. I guess I don't agree that it's nothing.

 

[NYCmetsfan]

Look we all know that the Lakers are garbage. The evidence is abundantly clear on that. That hardly needs an investigation.

Just like we know that housing classified data on a private server is illegal. Not to mention why was the server even created in the first place? Aside from supposed convenience? Has anyone answered that?

Is Hillary going to be indicted? I don't know. I think it can go either way. Yet, because you and others don't agree with that it's now a running joke. I guess I don't agree that it's nothing.

Lol

 

[FloydtheFathead]

This is funny to me right now because we have an almost exact 50/50 shot at keeping our pick (though less so in the top 1-2)

You're the Lakers.. You all are gonna end up with him.

More breaks than any franchise in sports.

 

[Godslay]

Angry Grimace, where did you go?

 

[Emarv]

"I don't know anything about the history of the legality involved in this investigation, therefore anything can happen! Anything!"

 

[PBY]

The Hillary indictment can go either way in the way that a sixers/warriors series can go either way.

 

[Doc Holliday]

I think Howard Stern might have saved the world with those interviews lol

 

[Iolo]

I think Howard Stern might have saved the world with those interviews lol

What if that was his purpose all along

 

[Wolfgunblood Garopa]

"I don't know anything about the history of the legality involved in this investigation, therefore anything can happen! Anything!"

Hard hitting analysis on the level of the Super Fans debating the final score of Mini-Ditka vs Giants.

 

[ampere]

Wow. Gingrich is already up at 28 cents on predict it. It can't be him! I don't believe it!

He is pretty Trump-like... but at the same time what does he bring to the ticket? Does Trump even care if someone brings something to the ticket? lol

You would think they'd try to go with a woman to try to smooth over the unfavorables with women, but who knows

 

[Fenderputty]

go back to NBA gaf.

Would you believe there's a 50/50 shot I'll listen to you?

 

[Godslay]

There's a better than 50/50 chance there was classified email stored on that private server. Nobody has disputed that yet.

 

[Clefargle]

Here is my early recommendation for the next OT title:

PoliGAF 2015 |OT6| The Shills Have Lies

Edit: It's even better!

 

[googleplex]

She's not super charismatic, that's it John.

Does he really claim she doesn't care about civil rights advocacy? She seems passionate and energized when talking about women's rights, LGBT rights and minority rights.

The fact that every word she's spoken, ever look, every Nuance gesture is taken apart sharpened. And used at weapons against her for the last 30 years maybe the reason she has to be mindful of what she says. She's never had the luxury of just saying what on her mind.

 

[Crocodile]

Interesting articles I've come across recently:

How to "save" the Republican party with some real changes in approach and especially policy

Calling out his flip-flopping: Article 1 and Article 2

How "purity" has hurt the Republican Party and creeping into the Left

 

[FloydtheFathead]

He is pretty Trump-like... but at the same time what does he bring to the ticket? Does Trump even care if someone brings something to the ticket? lol

You would think they'd try to go with a woman to try to smooth over the unfavorables with women, but who knows

I guess in his mind would help to shore up his right flank some more as the man still is viewed as "antiestablishment" among the baggers a la Ted Cruz.

It might make the GOP leadership feel a little better I guess as he selected an establishment type who knows Washington.

And plus.. Newt is an asshole like Trump and Trump might pick him because he is similar to him.

 

[NYCmetsfan]

The Hillary indictment can go either way in the way that a sixers/warriors series can go either way.

 

[Bowdz]

As Dan Senor pointed out on WADR today, McCain was leading Obama by 10% at this point in 2008 while Obama was still in the primary. If Trump is in a statistical tie at this point, it doesn't bode well for him long term.

 

[Ophelion]

The fact that every word she's spoken, ever look, every Nuance gesture is taken apart sharpened. And used at weapons against her for the last 30 years maybe the reason she has to be mindful of what she says. She's never had the luxury of just saying what on her mind.

Truth. I don't know how she's still sane, much less as together and capable as she is. She must just compartmentalize like a fuckin' champ.

 

[thezerofire]

holy fucking shit. the data wasn't classified when she got it. It was classified afterwards! It's not like "oh it was always classified, she didn't know it," it was just straight up not classified.

To help you with this concept, imagine your team is winning handily. Then halfway through the refs say, oh yeah, from now on 3 pointers are cause for being removed from the game. Would you really expect them to remove all your players who had made a 3 during the first half?

 

[Godslay]

So you've posted LOL and a JPG.

I expected better, maybe you can tell me if that private server had classified info on it, or what the purpose of the server even was, aside from 'convenience' ?

 

[NYCmetsfan]

There's a better than 50/50 chance there was classified email stored on that private server. Nobody has disputed that yet.

There's an above 80 percent chance that there may have been, but maybe not been, the smoking gun in the Vincent Foster case on that server

Disprove me

So you've posted LOL and a JPG.

I expected better, maybe you can tell me if that private server had classified info on it, or what the purpose of the server even was, aside from 'convenience' ?

Its a joke that there are two possibilities hence by definition there's are only two possibility and all all else being equal

Spoiler

(its not though)

there's a 50/50 shot

 

[Godslay]

holy fucking shit. the data wasn't classified when she got it. It was classified afterwards! It's not like "oh it was always classified, she didn't know it," it was just straight up not classified.

To help you with this concept, imagine your team is winning handily. Then halfway through the refs say, oh yeah, from now on 3 pointers are cause for being removed from the game. Would you really expect them to remove all your players who had made a 3 during the first half?

There's an above 80 percent chance that there may have been, but maybe not been, the smoking gun in the Vincent Foster case on that server

Disprove me

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/statement_of_the_icig_and_oig_regarding_review_of_clintons_emails_july_24_2015.pdf

 

[PBY]

As Dan Senor pointed out on WADR today, McCain was leading Obama by 10% at this point in 2008 while Obama was still in the primary. If Trump is in a statistical tie at this point, it doesn't bode well for him long term.

Ehhh I'm not sure you can just apply that here. I'm certain part of that had to do with name recognition.

 

[Aaron Strife]

As Dan Senor pointed out on WADR today, McCain was leading Obama by 10% at this point in 2008 while Obama was still in the primary. If Trump is in a statistical tie at this point, it doesn't bode well for him long term.

Even then, he really isn't. People are just focusing on the outliers. Which with the exception of Rasmussen still show him losing, it's just within the margin of error.

 

[NeoXChaos]

My first Presidential General Election with you all is going to be fun. Will Aaron, B-dubs and pigeon diablos atleast once? Find out next time on PoliGAF Z.

 

[thezerofire]

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/statement_of_the_icig_and_oig_regarding_review_of_clintons_emails_july_24_2015.pdf

Ok that's fair, but the report doesn't say anything about the nature of those emails, who they're from, whether they were viewed and by who, etc. Email servers store email, that's what they do, but they don't necessarily prevent anyone from sending anything to them. It'd be one thing if Clinton sent emails that were classified but unmarked, but there doesn't seem to be any evidence for that. Just that "they existed" on the server. There isn't even any evidence she knew either about them, or if she read them at all that they contained confidential email. You seem kind of obsessed with tying this back directly to Clinton without looking at any number of possible causes for this to happen.

 

[Godslay]

For the lazy:

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/statement_of_the_icig_and_oig_regarding_review_of_clintons_emails_july_24_2015.pdf

Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG):

The IC IG found four emails containing classified IC-derived information in a limited sample of 40 emails of the 30,000 emails provided by former Secretary Clinton. The four emails, which have not been released through the State FOIA process, did not contain classification markings and/or dissemination controls. These emails were not retroactively classified by the State Department; rather these emails contained classified information when they were generated and, according to IC classification officials, that information remains classified today. This classified information should never have been transmitted via an unclassified personal system.

Ok that's fair, but the report doesn't say anything about the nature of those emails, who they're from, whether they were viewed and by who, etc. Email servers store email, that's what they do, but they don't necessarily prevent anyone from sending anything to them. It'd be one thing if Clinton sent emails that were classified but unmarked, but there doesn't seem to be any evidence for that. Just that "they existed" on the server. There isn't even any evidence she knew either about them, or if she read them at all that they contained confidential email. You seem kind of obsessed with tying this back directly to Clinton without looking at any number of possible causes for this to happen.

Doesn't matter. Violates the law. Can't house this stuff on a private server. She signed off on the SF-312 which lays this out specifically.

Why did the server exist in the first place?

 

[hammysaurusrex]

I want Trump to pick George Zimmerman as VP.

 

[shinra-bansho]

As has been pointed out a bajillion times post-hoc inter-agency classified. Not marked classified at transmission. IC considers the information classified and thinks they should have been. But they still weren't.

Here is my early recommendation for the next OT title:

PoliGAF 2015 |OT6| The Shills Have Eyes

The Hillz has eyes. Lots of eyes. Because she is a shoggoth.

 

[Ophelion]

My first Presidential General Election with you all is going to be fun. Will Aaron, B-dubs and pigeon diablos atleast once? Find out next time on PoliGAF Z.

If they do, we are in the shit. That's like the canary dying on you.

 

[Godslay]

As has been pointed out a bajillion times post-hoc inter-agency classified. Not marked classified at transmission.
The Hillz has eyes. Lots of eyes. Because she is a shoggoth.

That doesn't matter.

Information is born classified in some instances. Shouldn't have been housed on that server.

 

[FloydtheFathead]

If they do, we are in the shit. That's like the canary dying on you.

If Aaron diablos..
That is a really bad sign.

 

[NYCmetsfan]

For the lazy:

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/statement_of_the_icig_and_oig_regarding_review_of_clintons_emails_july_24_2015.pdf

Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG):

But what about this?

Spoiler

you now are subject to an FBI criminal investigation as you're computer HDD now has classified files on it. Indict him boys!

 

[Y2Kev]

So the reason why I said "here we go again" and why your behavior will change or you will get banned is that you do not appear to actually be interested in a conversation with anyone. You are repeatedly posting misleading or inaccurate information, do not respond to people as they correct you or demonstrate why your understanding is incorrect, and you make no effort to engage earnestly with people indicative of someone who actually cared what he was talking about.

I see we are still discussing items I feel were addressed last night and ignored.

I'm clarifying for your benefit up front this will not be because of your opinion.

 

[Iolo]

Here is my early recommendation for the next OT title:

PoliGAF 2015 |OT6| The Shills Have Eyes

The Shills Have Lies

 

[shinra-bansho]

That doesn't matter.

Information is born classified in some instances. Shouldn't have been housed on that server.

You should tell the FBI, Clarice.

 

[Godslay]

So the reason why I said "here we go again" and why your behavior will change or you will get banned is that you do not appear to actually be interested in a conversation with anyone. You are repeatedly posting misleading or inaccurate information, do not respond to people as they correct you or demonstrate why your understanding is incorrect, and you make no effort to engage earnestly with people indicative of someone who actually cared what he was talking about.

I see we are still discussing items I feel were addressed last night and ignored.

I'm clarifying for your benefit up front this will not be because of your opinion.

What's misleading Y2Kev?

I'm posting PDFs from state officials and documents that Hillary signed. Hosted on government links. I think that's valid evidence.

Nobody has provided much besides the following:

50/50 comments, LOL and shitty JPGS.

You want to ban me over that? Is that how it works here?