Nintendo: Switch dock only for charging and TV-out, Amiibo support, no commt on touch

The lack of touch screen is a big thing to leave off. Overall though, as far as a presentation of what the system does, what it looks like, how you use it, and what it plays, the trailer was spot on. The details like what exactly the dock does are big for us enthusiasts, but to the general public, the core idea of the system is plain as day. We'll get more nitty gritty details soon, but including that in the trailer would have overcomplicated things for the public - i.e. the people Nintendo most need to win over.

I'm fine with the level of info we got today, seeing as they follow up on it next week.
 
If it has a touch screen, I can't see it being a major feature, as you can't use it when its docked for TV use.

For that reason, I don't think it will have a touch screen to keep cost down.

It'll have a touch screen and probably gyros built in so you can play the Mario endless runner without needing to use the controllers. Along with presumably tons of third party mobile games if they're smart
 
How tedious is creating levels in Super Mario Maker going to be if there's no touch? And SMM better be coming out for Switch, or it's a no sale for me.
 
"We will make additional announcements about the Nintendo Switch hardware later, before the launch of the product," Nintendo told IGN."

...

Well that's nice of you Ninty
 
Aaww man. I was hyped for the SCD stuff too. Time to keep expectations in check now.
 
I think amiibo reader on the docking unit rules out those theories of there being different SKU's. Such as a handheld only SKU.
 
I'm most interested in battery life.

The battery in the Wii U game pad is a travesty, yet the pro controller has magical battery life.....

If I had to bet I'd say the battery life will be terrible, just so they can cheap out to keep costs down.
 
I guess the dock could allow the clock speeds to run on max so there's increased performance and when it's docked its actually running underclocked but I think Nintendo would have touted a feature like that.

Lol not you. You're awesome. I meant the article lol. Although looking back at the quote I can see how it looks. Lol. My bad.
 
Are people surprised by this? I think the only difference it'll will make is that the Switch main unit will run on a higher clock when docked to output higher resolutions to the TV. Also, i believe the cooler on the main unit will only turn on when docked.
 
This thing is going to be under $200. I can feel it.

no way

Are people surprised by this? I think the only difference it'll will make is that the Switch main unit will run on a higher clock when docked to output higher resolutions to the TV. Also, i believe the cooler on the main unit will only turn on when docked.

Yeah, I think it will run faster docked while out of it it will run on an " economy mode" to preserve battery.
 
Constantly charging a battery and not letting it die regularly is terrible for long term battery life. I hope they have a solution for this.
 
I knew we were heading to another huge disappointment led by Nintendo.

Welp, for whats worth, I really liked the art style of that Zelda. Maybe I'll buy my first Nintendo after the SNES because of that game (if the battery life isn't as ridiculous as I suspect it is).
 
I guess the dock could allow the clock speeds to run on max so there's increased performance and when it's docked its actually running underclocked but I think Nintendo would have touted a feature like that.


Lol not you. You're awesome. I meant the article lol. Although looking back at the quote I can see how it looks. Lol. My bad.

Hahaha, I thought it was because I said you were the Melania Trump of the Emily/SMD/HNF debacle.

Glad we're cool, Mr. Trudeau
 
Are people surprised by this? I think the only difference it'll will make is that the Switch main unit will run on a higher clock when docked to output higher resolutions to the TV. Also, i believe the cooler on the main unit will only turn on when docked.

Yeah, this is what I'm expecting. The dock doesn't add horsepower, but by virtue of being plugged in, the handheld can upclock and not worry about decharging quickly. It'll probably run underclocked when in handheld mode, since it only ever has to worry about 720p.
 
That is a massive piece of empty plastic. Very odd from a design perspective. The whole dock is sort of baffling; it mostly obscures the screen, making second-screen functionality impossible, but doesn't totally cover the screen, which just looks odd. I seems like its function could have easily been achieved by a small box the size of the GC>Wii U controller adapter, which surely would have saved money while making the system less bulky.
 
Nothing they said necessarily rules out the dock adding some sort of additional, non-trivial processing. The handheld unit is still the "main unit" in such a scenario, and "provide output to the TV" could include this extra processing power. Or not. They used some very non-specific wording there.
 
Constantly charging a battery and not letting it die regularly is terrible for long term battery life. I hope they have a solution for this.

They're not "constantly charging" a battery in docked mode. The power will be supplied from the wall and the battery will be bypassed completely just like every other product you own that can be run off of battery or wall power.
 
720p gaming in 2017... interesting decision. I remember Wii's specs were also laughable but at least they had the motion control gimmick. Wonder how they'll sell this with all the competition from phones
 
It'll have a touch screen and probably gyros built in so you can play the Mario endless runner without needing to use the controllers. Along with presumably tons of third party mobile games if they're smart

Why do people keep saying it's smart to have mobile games on this system? Everyone already has a device to play those games and putting them on a giant 720p screen that's flanked by detachable controllers will add absolutely nothing to them.
 
Sounds like it underclocks in handheld mode because it doesn't need all the bells and whistles on a 720p screen and goes full power on the dock for HDTV 1080p goodness...at least I hope!
 
If it would just be for charge it would look like the small thing from the wii u ganepad or from the new 3ds. I doubt they said everything in that interview.
 
I don't care if it isn't a significant upgrade comparable to the PS4/ Xbone. I know Nintendo doesn't need top of the line power to make beautiful games. I just hope it can at least handle 1080p on tv :(
 
I doubt it will result in a resolution change. It might mean framerate increases though if the clocks go up. Designing a 720p UI and a 1080p UI for every game would be a pain in the ass.

? 720p UI can easily work on 1080p. We're not talking about 540p to 1080 rescaling.
 
Wonder why they aren't commenting on touch functionality, I mean it's not like they will add it 5 months from release.

Guess this means the chances of it not being there are higher.

No big deal if it's not there imo but such devices are expected to have touch functionality these days.
 
That is a massive piece of empty plastic. Very odd from a design perspective. The whole dock is sort of baffling; it mostly obscures the screen, making second-screen functionality impossible, but doesn't totally cover the screen, which just looks odd. I seems like its function could have easily been achieved by a small box the size of the GC>Wii U controller adapter, which surely would have saved money while making the system less bulky.

The height of the dock front could be to allow the screen to show status information without being a huge bright secondary screen shining into the room. Also it needs to stick up so it's easy to pull out of the dock. And no one wants a secondary screen that's tiny and half-way across the room, what would be the use in that?
 
Top Bottom