The thing there is... people either skirt around it and try to find out using other questions, or just assume that women of childbearing age are likely to want to have children. And then perhaps not hire them, but use another reason for it.
This CEO is straight up asking "hey iz you planning to pop out any babiez any time soon ?"
I don't think men generally get asked at interviews if they plan to have kids so the company can foresee paternity leaves for them.
You don't see any issue with hiring practices leading with questions like that ?
Isn't that understandable too? Employers want to know what is likely to affect their business. Maternity leave makes big dents in budgets and causes a lot of disruption. Of course it rightly is a legal right, so if you are employed, then you are entitled to it. And of course discrimination of race, sex, etc. is legally not allowed.
The US is only 'developed' first world country that doesn't offer a universal maternity program, if the program itself was a major source of loss for a revenue it wouldn't be widely adopted world wide.
Besides, in most companies you don't start getting benefits until you've been in there for a few months, especially in contract-to-hire jobs, or straight up contract jobs like most gaming companies tend to have anyway. Contract jobs in the wide majority of cases don't offer any benefits like this in the first place.
But there is also no right for you to be employed by a private company. If they don't want you, they don't want you.
Yeah, that's not what's being talked about here though.