RustyNails
Member
Why did the mods lock the Tim Kaine mistress thread so fast? What are they hiding?!
Goddamn re-listening to that audio forgot how UNHINGED BATSHIT Mel Gibson was...damn.
Why did the mods lock the Tim Kaine mistress thread so fast? What are they hiding?!
It could be our reality; see Schrodinger's cat.
Also, what does Silver mean by this?
These maps in the latest 538 update scare the hell out of me.
It could be our reality; see Schrodinger's cat.
Also, what does Silver mean by this?
He's driving website traffic by throwing out extremely implausible electoral map scenarios.It could be our reality; see Schrodinger's cat.
Also, what does Silver mean by this?
It could be our reality; see Schrodinger's cat.
Also, what does Silver mean by this?
FBI Director James Comey’s democracy-bending decision to inform America, 11 days before its presidential election, that the bureau is digging into a trove of additional emails demands the highest condemnation. And he must resign.
President Obama must order Attorney General Loretta Lynch to take the case out of Comey’s hands and to fully report the facts as they are known.
Without any base of knowledge, Comey let loose combustible information that could improperly and groundlessly decide the election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.
Comey has betrayed both the country and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
ftfyTrash has been trying to push the argument that the race is right and trump could win since July. Don't read 538's punditry or look at their trash.
1. The Clinton Landslide
In a staggering rejection of GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump, voters last night elected Hillary Clinton as the nation’s first female president, 53 percent to 41 percent — the widest margin in a presidential race since 1984. Clinton swept 30 states totaling 413 electoral votes. In an exclamation point, Clinton carried Arizona, Georgia and even Texas. Repudiating Trump, Utah gave its six electoral votes to conservative independent Evan McMullin.
Clinton’s landslide was fueled by record Democratic support among whites with a college degree, particularly women, as well as heightened turnout from Latino and Asian voters. Clinton won whites with a college degree by 10 percentage points, a huge turnaround from 2012, when Mitt Romney won them by 10 points. Black turnout and support remained steady from 2012, despite fears among Clinton backers that African-American enthusiasm would lag without President Obama on the ballot.
Turnout among Latinos surged from 47 percent to 57 percent, and Clinton won them by a massive 58 points, allowing Clinton to shock Trump in the Lone Star State. After plenty of hype, there was no uptick in turnout or support for Trump among whites without a college degree; he won them by about the same margin as Mitt Romney did. Moreover, support for third-party candidates was just 6 percent, lower than many pre-election polls had predicted.
Down ballot, Democrats swept all seven Senate races rated as “toss-ups” by the Cook Political Report, earning a 54 to 46 majority and even defeating Marco Rubio in Florida. They came within five seats of retaking the House, throwing Paul Ryan’s future as speaker into doubt. The magnitude of Clinton’s victory forced Republicans to re-evaluate their long-term national viability: Calling Trump a “cancer on conservatism,” GOP leaders vowed to purge Trump from the party — though it’s unclear they can.
I'd be happy with a Comey resignation, but I know exactly how its going to play to the GOP base
"WASHINGTON forced Comey to resign because he got too close to the truth"
Okay so, say either before, during or after the election Comey suggests that Hillary Clinton should be indicted. Assume that in the first two cases she goes on to win
Then what?
No I'm not freaking out, it's just that we are in uncharted territory here and I'm trying to think of all the worst case scenarios...
Can the electors revolt against her? Can Congress do anything? Can the FBI order either one of them to do anything? Would a lawsuit be filed calling her election illegitimate because she is indicted, and that the House should decide, with the case going to the SCOTUS? I can really see the absolute worst of scorched earth partisan hackery coming out of the woodwork on the GOP side if Comey keeps trying to fuck shit up.
My biggest fear is that in a near future, assuming orange turd doesn't win, people will cling to this idea that the world is completely broken and that something drastic must be done.
Words reminiscent to what orange turd has said but out of someone who is actually intelligent and articulate. How do we stop that? It is clear that there is a populist message that can attract both liberals and alt-right conservatives and that message resonates on the same basis.
That message being an anti-globalist crusade. It both applies to liberals who see it as some monster that is draining economic prosperity and for the alt-right who see it as a way to increase tolerance among different cultures and integration due to shared values.
To the alt right being anti-globalist is not an economic matter, it is a racial one. I wish more liberals will come to understand that globalization is needed, even if they view it as an necessary evil, to achieve peace and create a world of collectivism.
Nate has fallon victim to the "horse race" cancer. It's very common in national media and Nate just can't help the attention and money it brings him. Will do anything to distort the truth to make things more interesting than they are.
Coney has given the DOJ the easiest out to not do anything with his recommendationOkay so, say either before, during or after the election Comey suggests that Hillary Clinton should be indicted. Assume that in the first two cases she goes on to win
Then what?
No I'm not freaking out, it's just that we are in uncharted territory here and I'm trying to think of all the worst case scenarios...
Can the electors revolt against her? Can Congress do anything? Can the FBI order either one of them to do anything? Would a lawsuit be filed calling her election illegitimate because she is indicted, and that the House should decide, with the case going to the SCOTUS? I can really see the absolute worst of scorched earth partisan hackery coming out of the woodwork on the GOP side if Comey keeps trying to fuck shit up.
No I'm not freaking out, it's just that we are in uncharted territory here and I'm trying to think of all the worst case scenarios...
Trying to think of the possibilities that may lie ahead if things go south isn't necessarily freaking out...That's the definition of freaking out.
I strongly dislike his explanations for his models, but I don't think he's in it for the money (I'm sure he's well-off enough). I do think that Silver is essentially the exact sort of white undecided voter who considers both Hillary and Trump to be equally bad (if pressed, he'd say Trump is worse of course, but I really doubt that's his actual emotional response to either of them). He's a libertarian who likely hates the two-party system and is equally embarrassed that his chosen party picked Johnson, one of the worst candidates I can remember. Personal biases like that are hard to deal with. I've got a friend who's almost exactly like Silver; he rants about both Hillary and Trump all the time, and if it's an online post, he finishes the rant with #FeelTheJohnson every time.
There may also be a second major issue with FiveThirtyEight, which we will describe as one of economy. We start this part of the discussion by noting that every one of us who is writing about politics this year benefits from a horse race. "Things are the same as they were yesterday" is not a story. "Clinton extends her lead" and "Trump makes up ground on Clinton" are. Similarly, we also benefit from finding things that are new and different to talk about. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and his rallies tended to get relatively little media coverage; not because of any particular bias against him, but because they were all the same. You can only write, "10,000 young, mostly white people show up to cheer Sanders" so many times. Hillary Clinton, evenhanded and cautious as she is, also tends to give us relatively little to talk about much of the time. With Donald Trump, on the other hand, it's several new and outrageous and previously unheard of things almost every day. Hence his dominance of the headlines.
Point is, all the political sites have a certain bias towards "dog bites man." However, there is reason to believe the bias is unusually strong for Silver and his crew. Many political sites and prognosticatorsNBC News, the Wall Street Journal, Fox News, Bloomberg Politicsare part of organizations for whom political coverage is part of their core mission. OthersSabato's Crystal Ball, the Harvard Political Revieware part of (and are supported by) universities. Still othersHuffPo, Breitbart, Politico, The Hillare already stable, self-sustaining businesses. And a fewthis site, Sam Wang's Princeton Election Consortiumare side projects of academics who already have day jobs. The point is that while we all like page views and clicks, none of these sites isas far as we knowfacing an immediate existential crisis. Page views could go up or down by 50%, and most or all of the above would keep on trucking.
My biggest fear in this coming week is a plausible one. Comey comes out Thursday or Friday and has a big dramatic news conference where he attempts to add clarity but ends up saying "I don't know anything yet" and Hillary and Democrats have to endure the entire final 11 day stretch without one favorable news cycle.
Nate has been trying to push the argument that the race is right and trump could win since July. Don't read 538's punditry, just look at their models.
It is when you start freaking out about them!Trying to think of the possibilities that may lie ahead if things go south isn't necessarily freaking out...
Why are people losing their damn minds over this?
Only thing happening in a relatively boring stretch of the campaign
Pundits writing fan fiction about what articles could be written is worse than poligaf writing fictional Hillary responses.
Comey resigning would just extend this and make Clinton look worse. The freak out over this, from Reid's laughable letter to some other hand wringing I've seen on Twitter, really reminds us that democrats are still losers even after winning a few national elections. And it also shows that Hillary would be DOA right now against a decent republican nominee.
Relax, nothing changed on the ground.
I agree with everything except for the bolded. A decent Republican nominee would require a decent Republican electorate.
Electoral-Vote and others disagree with the bolded.
From the OP of my thread, curtosey of electoral-vote:
Comey resigning would just extend this and make Clinton look worse. The freak out over this, from Reid's laughable letter to some other hand wringing I've seen on Twitter, really reminds us that democrats are still losers even after winning a few national elections. And it also shows that Hillary would be DOA right now against a decent republican nominee.
Relax, nothing changed on the ground.
Why are people losing their damn minds over this?
Well to be fair the presidency is all we have left stopping R's from controlling all 3 branches of government & 30 states. Considering we suck at everything else.
Fun article about why Trump has struggled so much in Alaska:
https://www.adn.com/politics/2016/1...nt-never-really-took-off-in-red-state-alaska/
As noted previously, it doesn't actually take a huge swing in voters to move Alaska since so few people there vote.
It's dominating the news cycle close to the finish and it's negative for Hillary (even though it's unfair)
Right, but I think the latter problem is fixable if we weren't so focused on maintaining the former solution. We need to stop taking every worthwhile Dem in the country and saying "They should run for President!" Let them be good senators/reps/governors/etc... and expand our influence.
yup. Crazy that the Trump campaign hasn't been playing it up that they'll have unilateral control of the government if they win!Well to be fair the presidency is all we have left stopping R's from controlling all 3 branches of government & 30 states. Considering we suck at everything else.
It probably helps that Alaska tends to be a more Libertarian Red type of state. Everyone knows that Trump's biggest pushes have been for social conservative policies and he has in no way shown any serious commitment to actual "small government" mentality.
Plus I bet that Alaskans tend to get the most worried about Putin considering how geographically close they are to Russia. We all mocked Sarah Palin in 2008 for her paranoia of Putin (and we even mocked Romney for saying that Russia is our biggest adversary), yet now that paranoia seems have been a good idea, even if with Palin is seems to have been for dumb reasons.