Speaking of Ohio
Trump 49% (+5)
Clinton 44%
@trfgrp 10/24-26
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4lhKxf9pMitc3JzeUJiN3MxZHc/view
Note: Never heard of the pollster, looks landline only
Well that explains the Trump + 5
Is Robby Mook from Ohio?
Speaking of Ohio
Trump 49% (+5)
Clinton 44%
@trfgrp 10/24-26
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4lhKxf9pMitc3JzeUJiN3MxZHc/view
Note: Never heard of the pollster, looks landline only
Can't help but think Trump wins Iowa and Ohio.Iowa is going for Hillary.
Can't help but think Trump wins Iowa and Ohio.
It's time to give up on Iowa, friends.
Iowa is clearly trending away from us. It has been for a bit.
Don't say that because then I'll have to move!
Can't help but think Trump wins Iowa and Ohio.
Don't say that because then I'll have to move!
Ugh. My county will be one of the few in Iowa voting blue this election. I really, really hope Iowa doesn't go red. We're at risk of a completely Republican controlled state government, and I would rather not be a part of Kansas 2.0. Our incredibly white demographics are threatening to drag us down this election.
I suspect Iowa and Ohio go Dem one more time but they're probably gone long term. Maybe Clinton could win them in 2020 if she won in a landslide but I see them being like Missouri was like eight years ago (winnable for Dems under the right circumstances).http://iowastartingline.com/2016/11/01/where-iowas-early-vote-stands-one-week-out/
Iowa early vote information. Basically, the assumption was if we could hit 90% of 2012 we can probably eek out a win. That's where we are right now.
Can't help but think Trump wins Iowa and Ohio.
They blame police killings on Dems correct? At least that's what I've heard.What does this have to do with the election?
We believe that most of the bounces seen in surveys this year represent sampling noise that can be reduced or eliminated by adopting by better statistical methodology. We risk a repetition of 2012 where polling swings were largely statistical mirages.
Although we didnt find much vote switching, we did notice a different type of change: the willingness of Clinton and Trump supporters to participate in our polls varied by a significant amount depending upon what was happening at the time of the poll: when Although we didnt find much vote switching, we did notice a different type of change: the willingness of Clinton and Trump supporters to participate in our polls varied by a significant amount depending upon what was happening at the time of the poll: when things are going badly for a candidate, their supporters tend to stop participating in polls. For example, after the release of the Access Hollywood video, Trump supporters were four percent less likely than Clinton supporters to participate in our poll. The same phenomenon occurred this weekend for Clinton supporters after the announcement of the FBI investigation: Clinton supporters responded at a three percent lower rate than Trump supporters (who could finally take a survey about a subject they liked).
Although we didnt find much vote switching, we did notice a different type of change: the willingness of Clinton and Trump supporters to participate in our polls varied by a significant amount depending upon what was happening at the time of the poll: when things are going badly for a candidate, their supporters tend to stop participating in polls. For example, after the release of the Access Hollywood video, Trump supporters were four percent less likely than Clinton supporters to participate in our poll. The same phenomenon occurred this weekend for Clinton supporters after the announcement of the FBI investigation: Clinton supporters responded at a three percent lower rate than Trump supporters (who could finally take a survey about a subject they liked).
Failure to control for non-response will result in phantom swings polls bouncing because of changes in sample composition despite no change in individual voting intentions. Of course, most pollsters try to correct for differences in sample composition be weighting samples to reflect population demographics. However, for reasons discussed below, demographic weighting is often ineffective in removing the type of nonresponse associated with campaign events.
MonmouthPoll ‏@MonmouthPoll 8m8 minutes ago
Coming today: PENNSYLVANIA
Prior Monmouth poll four weeks ago had
Clinton +10; tie in #PASen
https://today.yougov.com/news/2016/11/01/beware-phantom-swings-why-dramatic-swings-in-the-p/
Good article on polling variability
I don't have cable, are they still only talking about fucking emails?
get ready
I'm surprised their not back to Trying to find Malaysian Flight 370.
It's actually one of the main headlines on the CNN website. http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/02/asia/mh370-crash-landing-report/index.html
Agreed. But I believe Monmouth is focusing on states with compelling senate races.We got PA. We don't even need to poll there anymore. *yawn*
They have to be feeling good about the race.Msnbc said Clinton campaign just told them doubling ad buys now in Arizona and Georgia
*crosses fingers*
Msnbc said Clinton campaign just told them doubling ad buys now in Arizona and Georgia
*crosses fingers*
It's pretty scary given nonpartisan response bias leading to systemic polling error.get ready
are you a robotIt's pretty scary given nonpartisan response bias leading to systemic polling error.
GOP reform is a lot farther off than I thought it was. The deplorable base wants what it wants, and the party elites have zero leverage over it. It totally owns them. Short of losing the House, TX and GA, nothing will change their minds. And if they win in 2020, that'll put it off even longer. The only reform in the GOP we're likely to see anytime soon are some alterations to the ways GOP primaries are conducted. Their strategy is working well for the medium term. And their goals are assymmetric compared to ours: they only need one two-year period of control of the Presidency, House and Senate to reverse the New Deal and Great Society and destroy the social safety net. And while their demographics are in decline, our coalition is much less devoted to preserving and restoring the safety net than theirs is to destroying it. Given the way veto powers are set up in the constitution, I have little faith that we'd ever be able to get, say, Medicaid back after it gets repealed. It is easier to be the barbarians than the Romans, because the barbarians only need to win once.Winning close is not really that acceptable to me. Close avoids the GOP from attempting reform and validates Trump's campaign. We also need a majority Senate to get some semblance of a functioning government.
Tuesday night sometime after 11 p.m. authorities responded to a call about a church burning.
Local Black church Hopewell M.B. Church was not only burned but also vandalized with the words "Vote Trump" spray painted on the side of the building.
Winning close is not really that acceptable to me. Close avoids the GOP from attempting reform and validates Trump's campaign. We also need a majority Senate to get some semblance of a functioning government.
So, Mississippi...
We should have let Sherman finish the job.
http://m.wdam.com/wdam/db_349803/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=2RAFSzYF
Anyone else think the 28% of Republican crossvoters in FL are perhaps the female members of the household who were too scared to say they weren't voting for Trump infront of their husbands/fathers? We talked about this a while back. This is a documented occurence in Iowa.
So, Mississippi...
We should have let Sherman finish the job.
http://m.wdam.com/wdam/db_349803/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=2RAFSzYF
I just can't believe the numbers could be that high.