I already switched from 538 to RCP. It seems like no matter what poll aggregator I go to there's someone telling me that it is biased and skewed and should not be at all trusted.
here's the issue with RCP.
There's a bunch of polls there, but (IIRC) the only ones that actually are included in the average are the greyed out ones.
most of these are demonstrably terrible daily trackers- IBD/TIPP, LA Times/USC, ABC/Washpost, and Fox news for some reason.
This is an AWFUL way of creating a poll average. it's not going to be anywhere near accurate. If you want to look at it as a collection of polls that's fine- but the selection they list is fairly limited in the first place, and the ones they use to create their average are often flat out BAD.
Why is this? well...close races draw clicks. blowouts don't.
In contrast, this is what huffpost/pollster looks like right now (I didn't include everything in the screenshot):
far more polls taken included period, with none of the arbitrary inclusion or exclusion.
RCP has Clinton up an average of 1.7. Pollster has her at +6.
Which do you think is closer to the actual result?