RustyNails
Member
Not when he's tied to Trump's hip.Some of that Hispanic vote in Florida will go to Rubio.
Not when he's tied to Trump's hip.Some of that Hispanic vote in Florida will go to Rubio.
In a state or overall? If it's overall - look at the states. If it's a state, look at other states. If you fall into the 10% range in too many states then start looking at your assumptions.
We also have more data to use than just the overall or even state results. What was the voter breakdown? Did our assumptions about how to weight polls based on demographics hold up when compared to who actually voted? Which polls were accurate and what did they use as a voter model? Are there consistent assumptions made across successful or more successful polls of a given place? Did we correctly identify those? There is no lack of data or things to evaluate using that data.
lol! how is that bad news for Murphy? That guy has to be dancing in the streets right now.
Why the obsession over oppo?
She was looking to sell her candidacy on its own merits and was going for the upbeat/positive messaging before Comey Sneak Fuck dropped a huge mess on their laps on Friday. We're finally turning the corner on the media narrative, and this is time for the campaign to get back on message instead of waiting for some miracle panacea.
I'm currently spitting facts to one of my Trump supporter friends. All he can say is "CROOKED" and "Hillary is EVIL" lol these people man...
But that's assuming the conclusion that the 538 model is less accurate in this election. We'll understand much better in like 5 days.
i mean you could have just looked at the fact that WL is now directly linking to the_donald threads
Because that's a bad margin when white people heavily vote GOP.
There is no plan B if Florida is gone.
Pretty much. This is the only "possible" map without Florida for Trump that I can think of
And Colorado and Pennsylvania both seem like they're well out of reach for him.
Yep. And I don't even think it is possible for Trump to win Nevada if he loses Florida.
Really now. out of curiosity, where do you think Trump's favorability is with white voters?
Where was Romney's in 2012?
What do you think a spiking latino population does to the margin you need to win white voters by to win the state?
Really now. out of curiosity, where do you think Trump's favorability is with white voters?
Where was Romney's in 2012?
What do you think a spiking latino population does to the margin you need to win white voters by to win the state?
With the PR vote in Florida I'm expecting a big victory here for Hillary. I'm gonna go with FL being called BEFORE the west coast polls close.
They can't be reasoned with. Ultimately they just hate women or are racists--no facts will fix that
This election is over, and has been over for a long, long time.
The Clinton campaign, you know, knows what it's doing. They know where to go. They have endless options of where to send people. They have internals that are run by the same crew that landed Obama a 4 point victory when public polling was either at a tie, slim Obama win, or simply Romney victory.
Do you see the Clinton campaign freaking out because New Hampshire public polling is showing a tight race? Does the Clinton campaign look like a campaign that is freaking out at anything right now? Donald Trump is the nominee they are facing, the understand that if he has a sliver of actual hope of being POTUS it would be GG for the Western world. Does it look like they are reacting that he actually has a chance? They aren't, because he doesn't.
The same thing that happened in 2012 is about to happen now. We're going to wake up on November 9th with a margin of victory many points ahead of current national polling, because national public polling is trash that is being used to drive up click bait or news ratings. What's the point of even looking at this shit if we have to deal with CNN polls that can't even get a proper number of hispanics in a fucking NV poll? Or a proper sampling of under 35 voters? It's insane, and it's so blatant that half of these polls are trash and thrown out into the wild because, shit, we got to talk about something!
Anyways, that's my rant. I'm tired of this oppo-droppo shit. If you guys haven't noticed, Trump is literally a horrible human being and we just spent the last six months going over how fucking horrible he is. It just turns out that as long as you slap an "R" next to someones name, a large portion of the population will vote for them, even if they are racist, sexists shit heads who are literally pawns of a foreign government that is our main global adversary.
The only way FL or NC get called before 11 is if they're 10+ point blowouts.
Aka they're not.
Why the obsession over oppo?
She was looking to sell her candidacy on its own merits and was going for the upbeat/positive messaging before Comey Sneak Fuck dropped a huge mess on their laps on Friday. We're finally turning the corner on the media narrative, and this is time for the campaign to get back on message instead of waiting for some miracle panacea.
Why the obsession over oppo?
She was looking to sell her candidacy on its own merits and was going for the upbeat/positive messaging before Comey Sneak Fuck dropped a huge mess on their laps on Friday. We're finally turning the corner on the media narrative, and this is time for the campaign to get back on message instead of waiting for some miracle panacea.
This election is over, and has been over for a long, long time.
The Clinton campaign, you know, knows what it's doing. They know where to go. They have endless options of where to send people. They have internals that are run by the same crew that landed Obama a 4 point victory when public polling was either at a tie, slim Obama win, or simply Romney victory.
Do you see the Clinton campaign freaking out because New Hampshire public polling is showing a tight race? Does the Clinton campaign look like a campaign that is freaking out at anything right now? Donald Trump is the nominee they are facing, the understand that if he has a sliver of actual hope of being POTUS it would be GG for the Western world. Does it look like they are reacting that he actually has a chance? They aren't, because he doesn't.
The same thing that happened in 2012 is about to happen now. We're going to wake up on November 9th with a margin of victory many points ahead of current national polling, because national public polling is trash that is being used to drive up click bait or news ratings. What's the point of even looking at this shit if we have to deal with CNN polls that can't even get a proper number of hispanics in a fucking NV poll? Or a proper sampling of under 35 voters? It's insane, and it's so blatant that half of these polls are trash and thrown out into the wild because, shit, we got to talk about something!
Anyways, that's my rant. I'm tired of this oppo-droppo shit. If you guys haven't noticed, Trump is literally a horrible human being and we just spent the last six months going over how fucking horrible he is. It just turns out that as long as you slap an "R" next to someones name, a large portion of the population will vote for them, even if they are racist, sexists shit heads who are literally pawns of a foreign government that is our main global adversary.
Not when he's tied to Trump's hip.
Eh. You'll know, even if they aren't called.
Lol they have nothing leftWikileaks is posting /r/the_donald threads now... wow..
This election is over, and has been over for a long, long time.
The Clinton campaign, you know, knows what it's doing. They know where to go. They have endless options of where to send people. They have internals that are run by the same crew that landed Obama a 4 point victory when public polling was either at a tie, slim Obama win, or simply Romney victory.
Do you see the Clinton campaign freaking out because New Hampshire public polling is showing a tight race? Does the Clinton campaign look like a campaign that is freaking out at anything right now? Donald Trump is the nominee they are facing, the understand that if he has a sliver of actual hope of being POTUS it would be GG for the Western world. Does it look like they are reacting that he actually has a chance? They aren't, because he doesn't.
The same thing that happened in 2012 is about to happen now. We're going to wake up on November 9th with a margin of victory many points ahead of current national polling, because national public polling is trash that is being used to drive up click bait or news ratings. What's the point of even looking at this shit if we have to deal with CNN polls that can't even get a proper number of hispanics in a fucking NV poll? Or a proper sampling of under 35 voters? It's insane, and it's so blatant that half of these polls are trash and thrown out into the wild because, shit, we got to talk about something!
Anyways, that's my rant. I'm tired of this oppo-droppo shit. If you guys haven't noticed, Trump is literally a horrible human being and we just spent the last six months going over how fucking horrible he is. It just turns out that as long as you slap an "R" next to someones name, a large portion of the population will vote for them, even if they are racist, sexists shit heads who are literally pawns of a foreign government that is our main global adversary.
Lol they have nothing left
Eh. You'll know, even if they aren't called.
Overall, not a state. You keep harping on states but there aren't enough states out there. Even though there are 50 states, the election is really about less than 10 states. The polling is too sparse in places like Montana to matter.
Regardless, it doesn't matter. The solution isn't to look at the states because that says nothing. The 10% chance of a blowout prices in all the swing states, already. If she's blowing out in Fla, Pa, and Wis, then is makes sense she's do the same in NH, Nv, and possibly flip Zona. ETC.
Where you seem to be mistaken is that if she has a 10% chance of an election blowout that she is hitting the 10% blowout in each state. Not true! Not how the math works!
Wrong! We don't know the electorate, definitively. Hence why there's a discrepency between CPS and exit polling. How do we verify? Unless every state starts taking down demographic data for every vote that is cast, it's all just good guesswork.
And besides, even if we could determine it, it does nothing to proving the model right or wrong. If the polls are wrong because of demographic data or whatnot, that means the poll inputs in Nate's model was wrong, not the model. If the polls had the correct weighting, his model might be right. Or wrong, even.
You are talking about looking at the pollsters and their accuracy, not Nate's model. Nate's model, hell every one of these models, depend on the pollsters being somewhat accurate so no fault can lie with them if the polls are wrong.
Nate's model doesn't make demographic assumption or any of that stuff. Nate Cohn's NC model is doing that, but that's different.
Nate's inputs, besides polls, are things like incumbancy, trend, economic data like UE, Jobs, etc, and other things. None of which can be tested in the way you'd like.
Do you understand my criticism here? You're making the same mistake Nate Silver made during the World Cup when he thought his model failed.
When something unlikely happens, it doesn't mean your model is wrong. Your model is saying this unlikely event can happen! In fact, it's saying IT WILL HAPPEN sometimes. If you adjust your model because said unlikely event happened, it means you don't understand the math.
What you're basically arguing is that if I flip a coin 5 times and all 5 times it comes up heads, then we must conclude it's a weighted coin.
I really really doubt the networks will call Fla or even NC before the West Coast closes.
Reason being if you call either, especially the former, the election is already over and that could affect voting out West. I think the media will hold off just long enough. Maybe call it 5 mins before Cali closes.
Assuming they even can call it by then.
I approve.I think much like we classify Nates into "good" and "bad" we need to classify millennials in the same way.
Millennials born before 1990: Good
Millennials born 1990 and after: Bad
So what's a good time to start tuning in? 9-10 pm Eastern?
Great story on the rising Hispanic vote in Arizona. From 8% of early voters in '08 to 13 this year. Pretty clearly the reason why the Clinton campaign is putting resources in there.
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news...s-nation-early-voting-surge-latinos/93129112/
Yeah. This is why AZ is so much more winnable than GA despite similar polling numbers.
We know who the voters are in GA, and while it's close, I'm not sure where that last 80,000 votes to put us over the top will come from.
We know there's this massive pool of voters in AZ that hasn't been tapped into yet. Maybe they get us there.
Heres the Hispanic breakdown of Murphy/Rubio...