• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2016 |OT14| Attention NV shoppers, democracy is on sale in aisle 4!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
If she over performs her polls by 3+ points, she has a really good chance of taking Georgia.

I've seen this a lot on the board, but where is there evidence that Hillary will overperform polls? I keep seeing it in accordance with "Obama overperformed by such and such in 2012" but is that because he was a democrat, or because he was Obama?
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
How did Silver have more confidence in Obama winning in 2012, despite polls at the time showing a closer race than this year?

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-why-clintons-position-is-worse-than-obamas/

To illustrate this, let’s compare Clinton’s current position in our polls-plus forecast -- which gives her a 65 percent chance of winning the Electoral College — to FiveThirtyEight’s final election forecast in 2012, which gave President Obama a 91 percent chance. How could the model be so much more confident in Obama’s chances than in Clinton’s, even though we projected he’d win by 2.5 percentage points nationally and she’s ahead by 2.8? Part of it is because there are far more undecided and third-party voters this year, which could lead to a last-minute swing, or a polling error, and makes the model more cautious. But Obama’s and Clinton’s chances of winning the popular vote are relatively similar in our forecasts (76 percent for Clinton now, 86 percent for Obama then) despite that. The difference comes mostly in the Electoral College.

3% undecided vote versus 10% undecided vote is the big reason.
 
I've seen this a lot on the board, but where is there evidence that Hillary will overperform polls? I keep seeing it in accordance with "Obama overperformed by such and such in 2012" but is that because he was a democrat, or because he was Obama?

It's hard to poll Hispanics and young people. Who both vote mostly Democrat.
 
I've seen this a lot on the board, but where is there evidence that Hillary will overperform polls? I keep seeing it in accordance with "Obama overperformed by such and such in 2012" but is that because he was a democrat, or because he was Obama?

Clinton isn't going to overperform by 3 or more, that's a yuuuge swing but I do think she could come in 1 or 2 above the current average because:

1. Its pretty clear that her numbers from last Friday - Sunday were somewhat depressed by the Comey statement and are coming back around.

2. Hispanics are being under-counted in polls.
 
That's the way I am. I like sarcasm and I use it often. Cry me a river.

I am ready for President Trump.
The Donald, I love you
The Donald is the best

Are all things I have said on this forum, and I will probably say them again.

Dude, I don't care how you vote. I've done my part converting enough Floridian non-voters and soft GOP voters to cancel-out your apathy many times over.
 
New thread for new news?

Chinese mystic monkey picks Trump as next US president

000_HR62C-640x427.jpg


monkey-king-trump.jpg
Bill Mitchell just spontaneously orgasmed.
 

Barzul

Member
Something I'll be curious to see if Hilary does win, is how much of an improvement over Obama does she cement with white voters.
 
That's the way I am. I like sarcasm and I use it often. Cry me a river.

I am ready for President Trump.
The Donald, I love you
The Donald is the best

Are all things I have said on this forum, and I will probably say them again.

For someone who mmerely entered the thread to ask an innocent question, you sure seem to be sticking around in defense of your Trumpism.

You're telling on yourself and you just can't seem to help it.
 
Clinton isn't going to overperform by 3 or more, that's a yuuuge swing but I do think she could come in 1 or 2 above the current average because:

1. Its pretty clear that her numbers from last Friday - Sunday were somewhat depressed by the Comey statement and are coming back around.

2. Hispanics are being under-counted in polls.

Obama over performed by about 3 points overall in 2012. It's not unheard of.

With Hispanic turnout surging and them not being counted in polls very well at all, there's a very real chance of another +3 or more difference between the polls and results.
 

zethren

Banned
That's the way I am. I like sarcasm and I use it often. Cry me a river.

I am ready for President Trump.
The Donald, I love you
The Donald is the best

Are all things I have said on this forum, and I will probably say them again.

You doth protest too much, methinks.

Either way, your sarcasm doesn't really add anything constructive.
 

rjinaz

Member
Dude, I don't care how you vote. I've done my part converting enough Floridian non-voters and soft GOP voters to cancel-out your apathy many times over.

I'm with you. I don't care at this point that random gaf user is voting for Trump. He's losing. Whatever. I don't agree but free society.

I take more issue with people denying they have an obvious bias or even agenda. Just own it.
 
I've seen this a lot on the board, but where is there evidence that Hillary will overperform polls? I keep seeing it in accordance with "Obama overperformed by such and such in 2012" but is that because he was a democrat, or because he was Obama?
We can look back to the primary, actually.

RCP Ohio Primary polling average Hillary +8, she won it by 13.8
RCP Florida Primary polling average: Hillary +28.9, she won it by 31.2

But, it's a safe(ish) assumption to make even if we ignore the primary season. Hillary's group of voters are harder to poll than Trump's. We're talking younger, more diverse, fewer primary English speakers, etc. Plus, you can't ignore the ground game factor. And we do, in fact, know that it is working pretty well.

In Florida, for instance, the Republicans that are turning out are their core base of voters. They're not getting their unlikely voters to the polls. We are. Part of this is demographics voting against Trump, and the other part is, you know, we have people with the best brains on the ground.
 
We can look back to the primary, actually.

RCP Ohio Primary polling average Hillary +8, she won it by 13.8
RCP Florida Primary polling average: Hillary +28.9, she won it by 31.2

But, it's a safe(ish) assumption to make even if we ignore the primary season. Hillary's group of voters are harder to poll than Trump's. We're talking younger, more diverse, fewer primary English speakers, etc. Plus, you can't ignore the ground game factor. And we do, in fact, know that it is working pretty well.

In Florida, for instance, the Republicans that are turning out are their core base of voters. They're not getting their unlikely voters to the polls. We are. Part of this is demographics voting against Trump, and the other part is, you know, we have people with the best brains on the ground.

Yeah, I think the best reason to suspect she'll over perform her polling is the whole GOTV thing, and that the likely voter screening seems to have been under estimating dems more often than not.
 
That's the way I am. I like sarcasm and I use it often. Cry me a river.

I am ready for President Trump.
The Donald, I love you
The Donald is the best

Are all things I have said on this forum, and I will probably say them again.

The issue people are taking is that you say these Trump things "sarcastically" and then, in complete earnestness, profess that you would sleep just fine under his presidency. Your supposed sarcasm is extremely disingenuous because it is indeterminable from what you actually feel.

In other words, you are not being sarcastic. You are being playful. There is a difference.

"The Donald, I love you" is not sarcastic if you do not actually condone his existence. At best, it is an exaggeration of the fact you are completely comfortable with him, which is not exactly an exonerating explanation.

We don't label you. You label yourself.
 
How did Silver have more confidence in Obama winning in 2012, despite polls at the time showing a closer race than this year?
Very simply he just looked at the raw data of battleground polling. If a poll seemed off, he called out its methodology. But stuck with aggregates and numbers. No trendz adjusted leader bullshit thingamajig.

I remember in 2012 (or was it 2008) Incognito used to troll poligaf by saying he has a awesome super poll modelling tool that would adjust, crunch numbers and predict who the winner is based on what you feed it. Its hilarious to me personally that Nate is doing that with a straight face today.
 
I don't think there's a secret group of Clinton voters fbf will cause her to overperform.

She and Obama had digital and a ground game. Thus, they overperformed.
 
Economic news is good, right? Imagine if the battle to take Mosul pans out this weekend. These both could cut directly into Trump's message of doom and gloom.
 
I'm with you. I don't care at this point that random gaf user is voting for Trump. He's losing. Whatever. I don't agree but free society.

I take more issue with people denying they have an obvious bias or even agenda. Just own it.

Trolling is an art. Homeboy is an amateur.

The complete flip in the Orlando-Metro area over the past 20 yrs has scared the GOP shitless. The drug of constant development and low-wage workers has come to bite them in the ass. They can't make enough angry White dudes fast enough to overcome the immigrants their economy requires to survive.

I love the irony of Boricua flooding into the state, and threatening to make GOP intransigence and outright antipathy towards the island's economic solvency a rallying cry to unseat them.

Chickens. Roosting.
 

DrMungo

Member
How did Silver have more confidence in Obama winning in 2012, despite polls at the time showing a closer race than this year?

You hit the head of the nail here.
This is why I'm so disppointed with Silver this cycle. At this time; he was proudly flouting a ~90% chance of obama victory with a closer race.

Sam Wang as been my voice of reason.
 
Are Latinos are turning up like this all across the country? I think everyone here is gonna be really surprised on election night when it shows how much work Hillary's campaign put in vs Trump's haphazard campaign.
By raw percentage, they're turning up even more in Arizona. Turnout in Texas is way up too.

Also, to jump off what Buffalo Man just said, I don't think there are secret Hillary Clinton voters. I just think there are people that are harder to poll, and these people lean overwhelmingly towards Hillary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom