Hasphat'sAnts
Member
Just finished canvassing.
Democracy is exhausting work 😔😔
Democracy is exhausting work 😔😔
It sucks that Trump will likely do better than John McCain, and that's accounting for McCain being a shitty candidate who had an ineffective response to an economic crisis that his party presided over.
Trump should be earning sub-100 EVs in a fair and just world.
Just finished canvassing.
Democracy is exhausting work 😔😔
Even if Stalin or Hitler ran, I don't think they'd get sub 100 EVS. The political climate is too polarized. As long as they don't want abortion, will repeal ObamaCare, and will nominate conservative justices, they will get most the regular red states any of their crazier policies, or huge problems with their character, doesn't matter.It sucks that Trump will likely do better than John McCain, and that's accounting for McCain being a shitty candidate who had an ineffective response to an economic crisis that his party presided over.
Trump should be earning sub-100 EVs in a fair and just world.
Even if Stalin or Hitler ran, I don't think they'd get sub 100 EVS. The political climate is too polarized. As long as they don't want abortion, will repeal ObamaCare, and will nominate conservative justices, they will get most the regular red states.
I don't think we're on the same page. He starts at Clinton + 7, right. That Clinton + 7 is built on a turnout assumption of X for whites, Y for blacks, Z for hispanics, Q for young people, etc. The turnout is coming in as he expected based on the poll (actually a little better for Clinton). So ASSUMING the sample was correct and the state IS C+7, the turnout confirms that. However, if the sample was wrong and it is really C+2 or C-55, then the turnout imputed in the model is irrelevant.
He's not saying it's proving C+6/7 and that's all over his twitter...
How did it go?q
My final predictions:
2. Final map if the polls are more accurate:
Pence looking like he shit himself and is trying to pass it off unnoticed.
He's adjusted the polls to account for systematic polling error.If the polls are accurate HRC wins NC and FL, Diablos
Bet fox news would spin it as self defense and the judge was a liberalYeah, it's why I was surprised to see the South Korean president with 5% approval.
Trump could be convicted of murder while running a cult and still get AT LEAST a 20% approval rating.
Yeah, it's why I was surprised to see the South Korean president with 5% approval.
Trump could be convicted of murder while running a cult and still get AT LEAST a 20% approval rating.
You mean 0 EVs.
Even if Stalin or Hitler ran, I don't think they'd get sub 100 EVS. The political climate is too polarized. As long as they don't want abortion, will repeal ObamaCare, and will nominate conservative justices, they will get most the regular red states any of their crazier policies, or huge problems with their character, doesn't matter.
Polls accurate according to whom? RCP + Diablos freakout factor?
Clinton campaign will also air a 2 minute TV ad Monday
My final predictions:
1. Final map if the polls were inaccurate and what we're seeing on the ground and in data thus far continues to look good heading into Election Day:
2. Final map if the polls are more accurate:
Leaning more towards #1 right now.
I'm being generous to Trump in my second map, accounting for, you know, systemic polling error as an ode to Nate Silver as he likely becomes irrelevant after this election unless Trump wins bigly. Basically it's a map for those who think Trump's win is being hidden by the MoE. It's possible, but I don't think likely at this point
Also I'm a he. Thanks
Nothing came from the WSJ story last night?
You'll have to be more specific.
I know but the entire narrative out of the prime time talking head arena last night is that these polls are way too close and Trump never should be able to close the gap like this and blah blah and it's like 1980 when Reagan surged ahead. This is me tipping my hat to them, as I do think it's possible but not probable. And honestly if you take a lot of the "crappy" polls we've seen lately you can come to the conclusion that the map would look that way. So yeah.Trump winning would require something like a massive "hidden white vote" or "silent majority" no one saw coming.
Given that there was no massive increase in white registration, or increase in new white voters during the primary, its a pretty safe bet this doesn't exist.
If there's a MoE error, it's not in his favor.
Nothing came from the WSJ story last night?
A new Morning Call/Muhlenberg College poll shows Democrat Hillary Clinton with a 6-point lead among likely Pennsylvania voters, who also expressed some concerns about potential violence as the tense and tumultuous election draws to a close.
The results are similar to a poll conducted two weeks earlier , indicating little to no shift in public opinion after the recent FBI announcement that it was reviewing a new set of emails linked to Clinton, said Chris Borick, director of the Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Opinion.
The statewide survey conducted between Oct. 30 and Nov. 4 with 405 likely Pennsylvania voters and with a margin of error of 5.5 percentage points shows Clinton with support from 48 percent and Trump with the backing of 42 percent in a head-to-head matchup.
When third-party candidates are included, Clinton's lead narrows to 4 points. She drew 44 percent, with Trump at 40 percent, Libertarian Party nominee Gary Johnson at 7 percent and Green Party candidate Jill Stein at 2 percent.
You'll have to be more specific.
Ironically, Domino's is owned by a very Socially Conservative family. CCM is most assuredly a Planned Parenthood ally. Suck it Noid!
Playmate affair that the national enquirer covered up in the late 90s
I know but the entire narrative out of the prime time talking head arena last night is that these polls are way too close and Trump never should be able to close the gap like this and blah blah and it's like 1980 when Reagan surged ahead. This is me tipping my hat to them, as I do think it's possible but not probable. And honestly if you take a lot of the "crappy" polls we've seen lately you can come to the conclusion that the map would look that way. So yeah.
And I've gotta say to much of the mainstream media and clickbait like 538, the final results are being made to look closer than they should be. That map is for them. "The polls are right".
Affair was in 2006, after married to Melania. Woman was Playmate of the Year in the 90's.
Y'all want some anecdotal hopium? I live in a red part of Ohio. A friend of mine just texted me and said they had 27 people show up for Hillary. They're right by the GOP office (Trump doesn't have an office near me which is stupid!) Anyway, the GOP had 2 volunteers show up. They just sent them home. In 2012, we were outnumbered by a bit with the Rmoney office.
Edit: 27 may not sound like a lot, but it actually is for us. I didn't have time to go, but phone banking helps. Too hard to figure out what to do with the boys.
There's no fucking way Clinton wins here and McGinty doesn't. The Morning Call should know better. I'm offended
National Enquirer bought the rights to Trump's mistress story in August and never had any intentions of putting it out.
Gee you don't think she's gonna lose this thing?My final predictions:
1. Final map if the polls were inaccurate and what we're seeing on the ground and in data thus far continues to look good heading into Election Day:
edit: I do see AK as a possible upset but did not think it was worth making a new map for. Ditto for AZ.
2. Final map if the polls are more accurate:
Leaning more towards #1 right now.
Based on what I've seen, Trump's strategy for signs is "bigger is better". Like, homes will have these HUGE ASS SIGNS that are made for offices or polling stations on someone's front lawn just leaning against the guard rail going up to their steps. It's fucking ridiculous but it speaks volumes to Trump's bully mentality if you think about it. Just spam your supporters with the biggest signs possible if they're willing to take them home to flex your imaginary muscles.I hope it's not real. Just because that woman is waay to hot for Trump.
Our vote goes to both Mrs Clinton and her party. Partly because she is not Mr Trump, but also in the hope she can show that ordinary politics works for ordinary peoplethe sort of renewal that American democracy requires.