• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2016 |OT4| Tyler New Chief Exit Pollster at CNN

Status
Not open for further replies.

NeoXChaos

Member
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/04/pragmatic-tradition-of-black-voters.html




The Democratic primary is a reprise of the classic purity-versus-pragmatism conflicts that periodically break out in both parties. Purists (on the left and the right) cast voting in morally absolute terms. They believe a hidden majority of the electorate shares their preferences, and a sufficiently committed, eloquent, or uncorrupted leader could activate that majority. Sanders is a classic proponent of this worldview. He has portrayed conservatism as simply a false consciousness constructed by big money and a biased news media, and something that would, in an uncorrupted system, be reduced to 10 percent of the public or less. Pragmatists read the electorate much more pessimistically. They recognize that the other side votes, too, and, having lowered expectations of what is possible in the face of a divided country, recognize that progress will be incremental and weighed down by compromise — sometimes with truly odious forces. That is the history of even the most spectacular episodes of progress in American history. Abraham Lincoln, who was holding together a coalition of voters that included supporters of slavery, refused to support abolition until the very end. Franklin Roosevelt needed the votes of southern white supremacists, and had to design social programs to exclude southern black people in order to pass them through Congress.
No community in the United States is more aware of the power of its enemies than African-Americans.
And pragmatism inflects the African-American view of how politicians perform in office. Purists see compromise as a sign of moral failure or weakness, an inability to smash a corrupted system. Pragmatists expect political opposition as normal and enduring. A politician who has their best interests in mind and pushes policy in the proper direction is better than the all-too-common alternative. Sanders’s campaign draws much of its strength from the left-wing critique of Barack Obama’s presidency, which it dismisses as largely feeble half-measures. Sanders has attracted Democrats most discontented with Obama’s progress, while Clinton wins those most satisfied, among whom African-Americans are disproportionately represented. Obviously, Obama’s status as the first black president creates a unique bond with black supporters, but much more than racial affinity is at work here.

But the critique of Clinton’s African-American supporters increasingly lies outside the realm of calculation altogether. Columnist Shaun King, a Sanders supporter, argues that “Political progressives across this country, in supporting the candidacy of Bernie Sanders, are completely rejecting the Democratic Party,” and should take their actions a step farther and “form our own political party.” Similar logic animates online activists declaring themselves for “Bernie or Bust.” Any drawn-out primary will produce overheated declarations of refusal to support the opposing candidate. But it is not surprising that many of Sanders’s most prominent supporters, like Susan Sarandon, Cornel West, and Michael Moore, not to mention Sanders himself, endorsed Ralph Nader in 2000. (Nader in 2000 drew the support of 3 percent of whites, but just one percent of African-Americans.)

That refusal to accept the necessity of compromise in a winner-take-all two-party system (and an electorate where conservatives still outnumber liberals) is characteristic of a certain idealistic style of left-wing politics. Its conception of voting as an act of performative virtue has largely confined itself to white left-wing politics, because it is at odds with the political tradition of a community that has always viewed political compromise as a practical necessity. The expectation that a politician should agree with you on everything is the ultimate expression of privilege.
 
Momentum where.

I think everyone agrees that happy days for Bernie are over. Wyoming has like 2 delegates they dont count. We're entering into a slow and agonizing death spiral phase. He needs to win NY by 10 points in order to change the narrative. I wish this momentum talk ended because it's making people think there's a chance and dole out their savings. Oh well what do I care. More money in Tad Devine's pockets.
 

CCS

Banned
After tonight it's almost over for Clinton. Bernie has almost accumulated enough momentum to be able to warp spacetime to his will, he's going to go back in time and marry Bill Clinton himself so that we get a socialist in the White House. Checkmate Hillary stans.
 
Hey Kev, have you heard that FFVIIr will be modeled after FFXIII? She must not be forgotten
imaginebeinginthataudience.jpg
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
Yeah, I don't see a result that basically throws out 80% of the pledged delegates happening.

Right. Plus, Cruz is already securing delegates in states that Trump won because of the second ballot. It's happening.
 
I don't understand why you guys are so worried about this. Bernie has been on record saying that if he were to lose he'd mobilize people because he doesn't want the republicans continuing to ruin the country.

Sure there's some folks that are getting a bit rabbid in terms of Hillary hatred, but the core essence of Bernie's campaign which I'm sure he'd reinforce in his speech is about everybody especially young folks to participate in the democratic process. And I'm pretty sure he'd be super hell bent on making his followers understand that.

I've been a Bernie supporter the whole time and the tone of stuff I'm seeing seeded on social media from friends who have been involved in the campaign grows less tolerable by the day. His respone about supporting downticket candidates from an interview a few weeks ago caused me some concern.

In other news, Bill Clinton's nearly forgotten 1992 sex scandal. I'm not sure that anyone who was over the age of 10 forgets any of that CNN and I'm pretty sure that horse is pulp.
 
I've been a Bernie supporter the whole time and the tone of stuff I'm seeing seeded on social media from friends who have been involved in the campaign grows less tolerable by the day. His respone about supporting downticket candidates from an interview a few weeks ago caused me some concern.

In other news, Bill Clinton's nearly forgotten 1992 sex scandal. I'm not sure that anyone who was over the age of 10 forgets any of that CNN and I'm pretty sure that horse is pulp.

Yeah that helped me in my decision to drop support for Bernie. He has been campaigning and acting in the interest of himself. He does not give a shit about the democratic party or democrats running for congress. Its easy to see why so many young people support him since many of them do not bat an eye at electing dems to the legislative branch. They don't consider those elections to be all that important.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom