You guys this think is because of the bad week he had? Or did polling kind of predict this?
Edit: Holy shit, I have a tag!
I had a client from Wyoming about a week ago from Cody and we talked quite a bit about the state. It was interesting because I also don't know much about it.Wyoming is a state that I know nothing about.
OLD PEOPLE STOP VOTING AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF YOUR GRANDCHILDREN, U-G-H
Wyoming is a state that I know nothing about.
Wyoming is a state that I know nothing about.
To be fair, who does?
How does one get a tag anyway?
Yellowstone National Park and geysers right?
Its fun to say it.To be fair, who does?
How does one get a tag anyway?
It's a very pretty state with nothing in it besides Yellowstone.
Also Cheyenne smells.
To be fair, who does?
How does one get a tag anyway?
Daniel B·;200570702 said:Whatever the final result, it'll be another state won by Bernie (17 vs 20), and the 14 delegates up-for-grabs represents just 0.008% of the remaining 1661 delegates...
This is the best reason to be on gaf Saturday nightsWait for a mod to get drunk and turn a thread into a tag thread. Post in tag thread
To be fair, who does?
How does one get a tag anyway?
Sure but if Sanders can only muster up a 7-7 tie in a state that similar states have given him 80% victories then it's over. And there's only one more mainland caucus left - on June 7 in North Dakota.Daniel B·;200570702 said:Whatever the final result, it'll be another state won by Bernie (17 vs 20), and the 14 delegates up-for-grabs represents just 0.008% of the remaining 1661 delegates...
As much as I would have liked to see Sanders win another 70 to 30 in a caucus, the way his reddit is reacting to winning by only about 10% is freaking stupid. At least they are consistent though, at least they cared about Wyoming from the start.
Anyway, ballots were mailed out via PACs and such, some of them didn't even have Sanders on it, apparently its legal if the state's SoS allows it.
Daniel B·;200570702 said:Whatever the final result, it'll be another state won by Bernie (17 vs 20), and the 14 delegates up-for-grabs represents just 0.8% of the remaining 1661 delegates...
I don't think supers are essentially a bad thing. But they show a dissonance with the current state of the democratic voters (members) and the elites. Bernie and his support is not based in a personality cult, but in ideas that a big part of the base agrees.
You would presume such division would be present too with the elites.
But delegates are chosen at the caucus sites. They're not chosen at their nursing homes.Democracy in action.
If there is anything that is a demonstration of "caring about Wyoming from the start", it would be those surrogate ballots.As much as I would have liked to see Sanders win another 70 to 30 in a caucus, the way his reddit is reacting to winning by only about 10% is freaking stupid. At least they are consistent though, at least they cared about Wyoming from the start.
Idk if there's anything else that can be the thread title after she wins the nomination.
As much as I would have liked to see Sanders win another 70 to 30 in a caucus, the way his reddit is reacting to winning by only about 10% is freaking stupid. At least they are consistent though, at least they cared about Wyoming from the start.
Anyway, ballots were mailed out via PACs and such, some of them didn't even have Sanders on it, apparently its legal if the state's SoS allows it.
Huh? Hillary has more votes and regular delegates than Bernie.
But delegates are chosen at the caucus sites. They're not chosen at their nursing homes.
lol
god damn it why won't this avatar background stay transparent
gotta save it as a png
I'm not even sure what Claire McCaskill is doing here: https://twitter.com/clairecmc/status/718840149098926082
But werk queen or whatever
So? If 95 Sanders supporters and 5 Clinton supporters show up to caucus, and Clinton wins the surrogate ballots 90-0, it'd be a 1-1 tie for that county and any of the 5 Clinton supporters at the caucus can choose to become a delegate.But surrogate votes are factored in.
@Taniel
With results from 21 of 24 caucus sites, Sanders is at 56.23% in Wyoming.
The threshold for a 8-6 delegate split is... 56.25%!
With results from 21 of 24 caucus sites, Sanders is at 56.23% in Wyoming.
The threshold for a 8-6 delegate split is... 56.25%!
What would the delegate count be if super delegates didn't exist, and were instead apportioned proportionally through all contests?
Some one who excels at spread sheeting should calculate this.
What would the delegate count be if super delegates didn't exist, and were instead apportioned proportionally through all contests?
Some one who excels at spread sheeting should calculate this.
wowowwowowwow
edit: damn it ivy
the revolution!
Just came back from a run what the fuck is going on in Wyoming?
It'll be 7-7 or 8-6. Underwhelming for Sanders. I think the fact that Wyoming has so little delegates, and thus a high threshold to win a large amount, really helped Clinton. The counties with 2 delegates for example require a candidate to basically be non-viable to get no delegates. Those with 3 require a 66-33 split for the winner to net 1 delegate (2-1) and so on.So at best he gets +2 out of Wyoming most likely
So? If 95 Sanders supporters and 5 Clinton supporters show up to caucus, and Clinton wins the surrogate ballots 90-0, it'd be a 1-1 tie for that county and any of the 5 Clinton supporters at the caucus can choose to become a delegate.