Macho Madness
Member
Don't you play with my emotions like this Jimmy: https://mobile.twitter.com/thehill/status/720354641079361536?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
The only thing that keeps dropping faster than Sanders chances of winning is you
OMG look at her pandering.Hillary visiting striking Verizon workers
https://twitter.com/jeneps/status/720363762453241856
WORK
FUCK
CELLPHONE QUEEN
Bernie did earlier today.Hillary visiting striking Verizon workers
https://twitter.com/jeneps/status/720363762453241856
WORK
FUCK
CELLPHONE QUEEN
Stop listening to KornwhackyKornacki did another Trump's path to victory map. He is saying Pennsylvania's 54 unbound delegates are key to Trump nomination.
My favorite are the NY, PA, MD, NJ and CA numbers.Ha!
"Bernie has won 55.8% of delegates in non-southern states so far. To win the majority of delegates he needs to win 56.4% of the remaining delegates. Don't let others discourage you. We are less than 1% away from being on right on track to win."
http://imgur.com/gallery/ruTOs
I'll be curious to see their "polls" that lead to Bernie winning pledged delegates by 1 after he loses by 10% or more in New York.
That would be an extremely surprising result!Hey Macho, is Sanders getting 62% in Indiana?
Hillary visiting striking Verizon workers
https://twitter.com/jeneps/status/720363762453241856
WORK
FUCK
CELLPHONE QUEEN
Feature not a bug.
OMG look at her pandering.
Afaik Indiana is not a Southern state so it's safe Sanders.That would be an extremely surprising result!
The article is actually pretty generous in proffering that he knows this is at odds withI spoke with Warren Gunnels, Sanderss policy director, and he told me that the senator doesnt believe there is a trade-off to be made. Sanders believes that raising the minimum wage, spending a trillion dollars on infrastructure and offering free college will fundamentally shift the structure of our economy toward the poor and middle class. It will inspire such enthusiasm and determination that more people will work harder and invest more, and the country will easily generate the tax income to pay for it. Hence, Sanderss plans wont cost money; theyll raise money.
The article is actually pretty generous in proffering that he knows this is at odds withrealityempirically backed orthodoxy.
But Indianapolis and Gary have sizeable black population. Gary shares Chicago media market. I dunno. I think Hillary got a shot there.Afaik Indiana is not a Southern state so it's safe Sanders.
So last night I talked to a Republican who won't vote at all.
Anyway, according to him, Obama has been the most hard line President ever. That from day one he refused to negotiate on anything and demanding "his way or the highway."
I feel like people live in an alternate universe, man. I ran through a litany of things to disprove this, to which I got pretty much no reply.
In the end, I was given a line like "Even if the GOP refused to negotiate from the get go a real leader would have lead and gone beyond that and brought them to the table."
I then asked him to name me his favorite President Leaders all time and he expectedly listed Lincoln first. So of course I told him that Lincoln, your greatest leader, couldn't bring the South to the table and it led to their secession and a brutal civil war and his assassination. So, are you saying Obama should have fought a civil war against the GOP or are you just making shit up about "leading?"
He basically threw me a "well, whatever we just don't agree." lol
I believed him when he said his campaign was about something more elevated than winning.
And it’s a message that, until recently, resonated. “This campaign is not just about electing a president, it is about making a political revolution,” Sanders said after a victory in his home state of Vermont. After significant losses on Super Tuesday, he defended the decision to continue competing in the primary on similar terms. “One of the reasons I believe we are doing so well is because people know that this campaign is about more than electing a president – it is about transforming America.”
To me, a campaign about more than the electing a president meant pushing Clinton left, even as Sanders maintained a completely respectful tone and did everything in his power to protect her from the coming attacks in the general election. But now, as the primary stretches into mid-spring, his message is increasingly about beating Clinton – both how he can do it in the primary and how he is better positioned than she is to win in November.
How dare a candidate not want to support candidates who don't share their values.
Bernie's biggest mistake was running in the confines of the Democratic Party. A third party Bernie ticket could've smashed the two party monopoly.
No one forced him. He's welcome to leave his committee chairs and be as Independent as he wants.How dare a candidate not want to support candidates who don't share their values.
Bernie's biggest mistake was running in the confines of the Democratic Party. A third party Bernie ticket could've smashed the two party monopoly.
How dare a candidate not want to support candidates who don't share their values.
Bernie's biggest mistake was running in the confines of the Democratic Party. A third party Bernie ticket could've smashed the two party monopoly.
How dare a candidate not want to support candidates who don't share their values.
Bernie's biggest mistake was running in the confines of the Democratic Party. A third party Bernie ticket could've smashed the two party monopoly.
So it's 4 congressman and millions of young people. I should amend my post just up the page.
Yeah it's not like he'll need those congressmen when he's elected. He's still got those millions of young people up his sleeve.I'll rescind my amendment.
No one forced him. He's welcome to leave his committee chairs and be as Independent as he wants.
From the replies
Her husband signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
1. Split liberal vote
2. Allow Republicans to win election
3. ???
4. Smash two party monopoly
Yes because having more Mary Landrieus, Max Baucuses and Ben Nelsons would be so much more useful.
Rather, its a discussion of a double-standard that I see, as a Jewish American and political writer, between the use of racism, versus anti-Semitism, in American politics.
How dare a candidate not want to support candidates who don't share their values.
Bernie's biggest mistake was running in the confines of the Democratic Party. A third party Bernie ticket could've smashed the two party monopoly.
Sanders greatest sin was trying to win the nomination. To some of his critics, he was cute and tolerable while he presented himself as a message candidate, but now that he resorted to the kind of tactics every single politician trying to win a position needs to (Holy Obama and Saint Clinton included) he is suddenly a vile and disgusting person that needs to be erased from the political landscape forever.
When the alternative is someone like Ted Cruz it sure is.Yes because having more Mary Landrieus, Max Baucuses and Ben Nelsons would be so much more useful.
Yes because having more Mary Landrieus, Max Baucuses and Ben Nelsons would be so much more useful.
How dare a candidate not want to support candidates who don't share their values.
Bernie's biggest mistake was running in the confines of the Democratic Party. A third party Bernie ticket could've smashed the two party monopoly.
Eh, there is some nonsense in there, but this quote:
is hard to argue with. America is hypersensitive to antisemitism, which is fine, but pinpointing racism against blacks is an uphill battle. While a presidential candidate who isn't totally supportive of Israel *without qualifiers* is seen as "not a serious candidate", you have the husband of the Democrat front runner defending his racist crime bill and dismissing BLM protesters as extremists... would Jews still support Hillary and Bill if they pulled the shit that they've pulled on us, on them? I expect that, given the alternatives, many still would, so I disagree with that part of the article at least. But the events linked in that article actually happened. And are we going to pretend that the Clintons, particularly Bill, have been unequivocally good for black Americans?
Good news! Low turnout among those who are now drinking the revolution kool-aid in 2010 and 2014 have made it so candidates running for the Senate and the House that are similar to Landrieu, Nelson and Baucus now have little to no chance of ever getting elected. Instead we have literal hardcore Republicans in their place, yay!Yes because having more Mary Landrieus, Max Baucuses and Ben Nelsons would be so much more useful.
How dare a candidate not want to support candidates who don't share their values.
Bernie's biggest mistake was running in the confines of the Democratic Party. A third party Bernie ticket could've smashed the two party monopoly.
Good news! Low turnout among those who are now drinking the revolution kool-aid in 2010 and 2014 have made it so candidates running for the Senate and the House that are similar to Landrieu, Nelson and Baucus now have little to no chance of ever getting elected. Instead we have literal hardcore Republicans in their place, yay!
A "revolution" doesn't happen by only supporting like minded individuals who pass an ideological purity test.