• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2016 |OT5| Archdemon Hillary Clinton vs. Lice Traffic Jam

Status
Not open for further replies.

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions


Were he to be nominated, conservatives would have two tasks. One would be to help him lose 50 states — condign punishment for his comprehensive disdain for conservative essentials, including the manners and grace that should lubricate the nation’s civic life. Second, conservatives can try to save from the anti-Trump undertow as many senators, representatives, governors and state legislators as possible.

That's just a special paragraph.
I wonder what other conservative essentials he is talking about?
I also love how they are STILL ignoring the elephant in the room, which is their "big tent" collapsed. It's now 3 smaller tents held together by people yelling at each other; the nationalists, the religious and the establishment.
 

User 406

Banned

This was written by Tay, wasn't it.

Although now I really want to get a t-shirt for my wife that says, "HIS DANGEROUS WIFE" on it. XD


Yeah, but you think they'd not want to fuel the flames.

They may just take Florida off the table.

Texas...well, not ready to go there yet.

They're trying to fuel flames alright, just from racist white people.
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
It's gonna be Newt.

He'd lose every woman in America with that pick!

That's just a special paragraph.
I wonder what other conservative essentials he is talking about?
I also love how they are STILL ignoring the elephant in the room, which is their "big tent" collapsed. It's now 3 smaller tents held together by people yelling at each other; the nationalists, the religious and the establishment.

They got too greedy and held their coalition together with hate, it was never going to last. Even W knew they had to change and if he hadn't been such a fuck up of a president he could have made that happen.
 
Based on the weekly numbers at the link, it seems Cruz's image has collapsed among Republicans in the last week or so. Has gone from +13 to -2 pretty quickly.

Happened before Fiorina too so maybe it was the alliance stuff?
 

PBY

Banned
Fuckkkkkkkkk


I still think he has a great shot at Indiana come on Don. Why has all the Indy polling sucked so badly?
 
Based on the weekly numbers at the link, it seems Cruz's image has collapsed among Republicans in the last week or so. Has gone from +13 to -2 pretty quickly.

Happened before Fiorina too so maybe it was the alliance stuff?
I do think it's the alliance. I haven't really seen anyone who particularly liked it, and it basically crashed and burned in 24 hours.
 
It's pretty easy to see that most Republicans are not #NeverTrump people based on these numbers though. Everyone has a view of Trump and 60% of Republicans have a favorable view of him.

60% of the Republican base being fine to passionate about nominating a white nationalist seems to say something, maybe.

Newt's revolution made it not cool to care about the environment:

t0luyrnfauix_xc1te3yva.png


http://www.gallup.com/poll/190916/a...ial Issues&g_medium=newsfeed&g_campaign=tiles
 

Bronx-Man

Banned
That's just a special paragraph.
I wonder what other conservative essentials he is talking about?
I also love how they are STILL ignoring the elephant in the room, which is their "big tent" collapsed. It's now 3 smaller tents held together by people yelling at each other; the nationalists, the religious and the establishment.
This really is a GoT episode.
 

teiresias

Member

I'm sorry but anyone saying this about the GOP

condign punishment for his comprehensive disdain for conservative essentials, including the manners and grace that should lubricate the nation’s civic life.

hasn't been paying attention to the way the party has conducted themselves towards Obama for his entire presidency - or they're delusional. Manners and grace? Something the GOP gives a shit about? Give me a damn break.
 

kirblar

Member
I don't think it'll even be close. My dad is a Republican, voted Reagan twice, Bush, Dole, W twice but he voted Obama in 2008. He's gone on record as saying the only way he would ever vote for Hillary is if she was against Trump. Well.....

He still lives in a Cold War mindset and doesn't trust Trump to be anywhere near the nuclear codes or the military.
Clinton being a known quantity is something that's going to ease people's minds on the conservative side. New things are scary to them.
 

FyreWulff

Member
So, as an aside, are 50-state primaries the new norm for non-incumbent years or is 2008 and 2016 two sides of a short lived coin?

Seems to me that there's so much money flowing, and internet/social media is so prevalent now that campaigns can last much longer. The beginning states are no longer the Grand Filters they once were. And it seems to make sense that Democrats should always have a 50 state strategy since it worked so damn well for Obama.
 
Trump shouldn't pick a woman if he's going to attack Hillary on her woman card.

Feh. Any woman willing to run on Trump's ticket as a Vice-Presidential candidate will look the other way whenever he says something sexist, like a young Phyllis Schlafly.
 
So, as an aside, are 50-state primaries the new norm for non-incumbent years or is 2008 and 2016 two sides of a short lived coin?

Seems to me that there's so much money flowing, and internet/social media is so prevalent now that campaigns can last much longer. The beginning states are no longer the Grand Filters they once were. And it seems to make sense that Democrats should always have a 50 state strategy since it worked so damn well for Obama.

I mean. You can call it a 50 state primary if you want but it's been essentially over for months on the dem side.
 

ivysaur12

Banned
So a friend of mine who works in academia supposed that Trump will only get 43% of the vote in the GE. I wanted to see what that looks like on an actual map, so I'm going to run some numbers using elasticity and the 2012 election as a base.

In 2012, Obama won 51.1% of the popular vote, while Romney won 47.2% of the popular vote, a 4.9% difference. Let's assume 1.7-2% of the vote goes to third parties, so if Trump is at 43% of the vote, Hillary would be at 55%.

Hillary Clinton: 55%
Donald Trump: 43%

So what does a 12% difference look like in modern American politics?

Elasticity quotients:

fivethirtyeight-0521-elastic2-blog48011.png


The races in 2012 that were under 10 points were:

Michigan: 54.21/44.71
Maine 2nd: 52.94/44.38
Wisconsin: 52.83/45.89
Minnesota: 52.65/44.96
Nevada: 52.36/45.68
Iowa: 51.99/46.18
New Hampshire: 51.98/46.40
Pennsylvania: 51.97/49.59
Colorado: 51.49/46.13
Virginia: 51.16/47.28
Ohio: 50.67/47.69
Florida: 50.01/49.13

North Carolina: 48.35/50.39
Nebraska 2nd: 45.78/52.95
Georgia: 45.48/53.30
Arizona: 44.59/53.65
Missouri: 44.38/53.76

Now using the quotients here with an 8 point swing, here is what I have:

Michigan: 58.33/40.59
Maine 2nd: 58.02/39.3
Wisconsin: 57.23/41.49
Minnesota: 56.69/40.92
Nevada: 56.68/41.36
Iowa: 56.67/41.50
New Hampshire: 57.10/51.28
Pennsylvania: 55.21/45.87
Colorado: 56.13/41.49
Virginia: 54.96/43.48
Ohio: 54.95/43.41
Florida: 54.21/44.93

North Carolina: 52.03/46.71
Nebraska 2nd: 49.80/48.87
Georgia: 48.88/49.90
Arizona: 49.11/49.13
Missouri: 48.02/49.72

This actually only gives North Carolina and Nebraska's 2nd to Hillary, while Arizona is a coin flip. Georgia and Missouri would be VERY close.

EDIT: But if Arizona Hispanic and Latino registration is as strong as it might be and Georgia's demographics, these might actually flip for Hillary. It's just using 2012 as a base.
 
So a friend of mine who works in academia supposed that Trump will only get 43% of the vote in the GE. I wanted to see what that looks like on an actual map, so I'm going to run some numbers using elasticity and the 2012 election as a base.

In 2012, Obama won 51.1% of the popular vote, while Romney won 47.2% of the popular vote, a 4.9% difference. Let's assume 1.7-2% of the vote goes to third parties, so if Trump is at 43% of the vote, Hillary would be at 55%.

Hillary Clinton: 55%
Donald Trump: 43%

So what does a 12% difference look like in modern American politics?

Elasticity quotients:

fivethirtyeight-0521-elastic2-blog48011.png


The races in 2012 that were under 10 points were:

Michigan: 54.21/44.71
Maine 2nd: 52.94/44.38
Wisconsin: 52.83/45.89
Minnesota: 52.65/44.96
Nevada: 52.36/45.68
Iowa: 51.99/46.18
New Hampshire: 51.98/46.40
Pennsylvania: 51.97/49.59
Colorado: 51.49/46.13
Virginia: 51.16/47.28
Ohio: 50.67/47.69
Florida: 50.01/49.13

North Carolina: 48.35/50.39
Nebraska 2nd: 45.78/52.95
Georgia: 45.48/53.30
Arizona: 44.59/53.65
Missouri: 44.38/53.76

Now using the quotients here with an 8 point swing, here is what I have:

Michigan: 58.33/40.59
Maine 2nd: 58.02/39.3
Wisconsin: 57.23/41.49
Minnesota: 56.69/40.92
Nevada: 56.68/41.36
Iowa: 56.67/41.50
New Hampshire: 57.10/51.28
Pennsylvania: 55.21/45.87
Colorado: 56.13/41.49
Virginia: 54.96/43.48
Ohio: 54.95/43.41
Florida: 54.21/44.93

North Carolina: 52.03/46.71
Nebraska 2nd: 49.80/48.87
Georgia: 48.88/49.90
Arizona: 49.11/49.13
Missouri: 48.02/49.72

This actually only gives North Carolina and Nebraska's 2nd to Hillary, while Arizona is a coin flip. Georgia and Missouri would be VERY close.

EDIT: But if Arizona Hispanic and Latino registration is as strong as it might be and Georgia's demographics, these might actually flip for Hillary. It's just using 2012 as a base.
lol amazing.

I actually do think AZ, GA and MO would just flip in that case. Could see IN being stubborn.

That MS is the least elastic state is what prevents me from thinking it would go blue anytime soon, even though it has a really high floor for Democrats. There just aren't any swing voters, they're all Republicans.
 

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
If things go like I think 55/43 is very possible. It's amazing i'm typing that and mean it.
 

ivysaur12

Banned
lol amazing.

I actually do think AZ, GA and MO would just flip in that case. Could see IN being stubborn.

That MS is the least elastic state is what prevents me from thinking it would go blue anytime soon, even though it has a really high floor for Democrats. There just aren't any swing voters, they're all Republicans.

A 4 points swing nationally would mean, on average, a 2.52 swing in Mississippi.

In this case, Indiana would be:

Indiana: 47.89/50.17

And for fun:

Montana: 46.18/50.87

EDIT: A 4.5 point swing would also not give you Georgia.
 
I don't think the question is who Donald Trump picks as his VP. The question is if Trump even gets to pick his own VP. The only way he gets a choice is if the GOP throws it's hands up in surrender. He doesn't have the delegates.
 
I don't think the question is who Donald Trump picks as his VP. The question is if Trump even gets to pick his own VP. The only way he gets a choice is if the GOP throws it's hands up in surrender. He doesn't have the delegates.

I'm imagining a situation where they brute force a VP candidate on him and he actually bad mouths his own VP on the campaign trail.

I need this to happen.

Not sure if this has been posted yet, but the Kasich campaign is fucking delusional. They're using fanfiction as ads. lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wuib2Vo3hSo&feature=youtu.be

lol

The delegates picking Kasich would be the end of the GOP.
 

Wilsongt

Member
It's pretty easy to see that most Republicans are not #NeverTrump people based on these numbers though. Everyone has a view of Trump and 60% of Republicans have a favorable view of him.

60% of the Republican base being fine to passionate about nominating a white nationalist seems to say something, maybe.

Newt's revolution made it not cool to care about the environment:

t0luyrnfauix_xc1te3yva.png


http://www.gallup.com/poll/190916/a...ial Issues&g_medium=newsfeed&g_campaign=tiles

That's disappointing. FUcking Republicans.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom