Bailey's? He went straight for the Jack
Now that Donald Trump is the presumptive nominee, this is not even a close call. There is absolutely no reason to drag this out any longer. Garland is not a great choice, but he is not a terrible one, either. And more than anything, he is old (for a modern Supreme Court appointment) and will be up for replacement in probably 10 years instead of 20 or 30.
Republicans must know that there is absolutely no chance that we will win the White House in 2016 now. They must also know that we are likely to lose the Senate as well. So the choices, essentially, are to confirm Garland and have another bite at the apple in a decade, or watch as President Clinton nominates someone who is radically more leftist and 10-15 years younger, and we are in no position to stop it.
In fact, if I were the Republicans, my main concern right now would be that Barack Obama would withdraw Garlands nomination today. The fact that Merrick Garland still exists as an option right now is a gift that should not be squandered.
The calculus has changed confirm Merrick Garland before it is too late.
That sounds so gross.You'd think he would go with Cinnamon Toast Crunch. Seems like the perfect cereal for that...
Lol.Bailey's? He went straight for the Jack
Why would he do that when he'll have the full backing of the RNC?
I just can't believe this is the sequel to Obama's presidency. The leader of the Birther movement now the Republican nominee and possibly the successor to his legacy.
Obama is itching to go out on the campaign trail. You can feel it. It's gonna be great to watch him go after Trump all fall.
heheh
GOP urged to confirm Supreme Court nominee after Trump win
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-acti...confirm-supreme-court-nominee-after-trump-win
Obama with the fifth dimensional chess moves.
heheh
GOP urged to confirm Supreme Court nominee after Trump win
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-acti...confirm-supreme-court-nominee-after-trump-win
Wait, what was the reason people gave for why Deval Patrick shouldn't be Hill's VP?
We passed the 5th dimension.This is 9th dimension chessObama with the fifth dimensional chess moves.
Claim on /r/The_Donald-- "CIA Director claims: Hillary emails may have CAUSED the Benghazi disaster!!!"
What's at the actual article linked: "Ray McGovern, CIA analyst and a trusted confidant of Presidents Nixon, Ford and Reagan, believes it is entirely possible that Clintons unsecure server was hacked."
Top comment: "Oh shit. Of all the theories I have heard, this makes the most sense." Though out of fairness there is an upvoted comment that calls out the source and title as bullshit. OP replied to that; "I didn't catch the difference before posting and cannot go back and edit it... However, if the story adds up and is true, it doesn;t matter if Hitler himself said it."
Number of sub subscribers that actually clicked through and read: Statistically insignificant. Gonna be a long summer, folks. God, it's Gamergate bullshit again. Shit. "Total lie of an article summary from grey web non-news source defaultly trusted as 100% fact without ever reading it; Even after being called out supporters don't give a shit." Anyone disagreeing could be "cunts", "sluts", "bitches", "SJWs", "cucks", etc.
Just set up recurring donation for Hillary
When she wins in November you know who to thank
I can't wait to see the gymnastics being pulled off in rationalizing Merrick before the election is over from those who said they wouldn't budge. Don't worry guys, this was the plan all along, all according to keikaku.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ce-priebus-donald-trump-republicans/83918846/
You think Ol' Reince is looking for the exit right about now?
If trump wins the whole thing we'd be in a darker timeline than back to the future part 2. At least Biff wasn't the fucking president.
The GOP is playing tic-tac-toe, Obama and Hillary are playing chess, but Trump is busy solving the JFK assassination.
Um we should be forcing the issue at this point.
My mom is the type of republican voter that doesn't think about politics much, but votes every election for the republican because she's always been a republican.
Just Hillary Clinton as a candidate by herself presented the first time there was an opportunity to make her rethink her vote, and Donald Trump absolutely seals the deal. I doubt it'll transition to long term support or downballot swaps, but it's certainly something, and I'm sure there's plenty of people like that to make 2016 an easy win for democrats.
Even against Jeb or Rubio, Hillary would probably get a lot of voters that like her experience, don't see her saying anything controversial, and understandably want a first woman president. Trump only helps to add to that.
It's kind of like the main Obama question remaining: Do Republicans say he's a Muslim because of genuine stupidity or are they using it as a substitute for the n-word?
He could be on the Court for 20 years or so, and he's immensely qualified.I wish Garland wasn't so old.
Ideally Garland would rescind his name after the election, giving Hillary a better opportunity to pick someone younger with her Democratic majority in the Senate. But I dunno, seems like Garland will definitely be on the court.
Whats Bernie playing tho?The GOP is playing tic-tac-toe, Obama and Hillary are playing chess, but Trump is busy solving the JFK assassination.
Complacency is dangerous. Maybe they want everyone worried so they go vote
CrosswordWhats Bernie playing tho?
If trump wins the whole thing we'd be in a darker timeline than back to the future part 2. At least Biff wasn't the fucking president.
Whats Bernie playing tho?
Whats Bernie playing tho?
My mom is the type of republican voter that doesn't think about politics much, but votes every election for the republican because she's always been a republican.
Just Hillary Clinton as a candidate by herself presented the first time there was an opportunity to make her rethink her vote, and Donald Trump absolutely seals the deal. I doubt it'll transition to long term support or downballot swaps, but it's certainly something, and I'm sure there's plenty of people like that to make 2016 an easy win for democrats.
Even against Jeb or Rubio, Hillary would probably get a lot of voters that like her experience, don't see her saying anything controversial, and understandably want a first woman president. Trump only helps to add to that.
He's complaining about the Monopoly house rules
Hah hah.He's the asshole in monopoly with a bunch of shit on the first two properties and that's all he owns.
He could be on the Court for 20 years or so, and he's immensely qualified.
I dunno. I worry he'll pivot well. I already see a lot more "He didn't really mean anything he was saying" and "He's really a lot like Bernie" posts coming through my stream. It seems like he just has to basically say nothing and let people make up their own narratives about what he does/doesn't believe at this point.Political journalists pretending that Trump can make this close are joke people. Trump is a sexist buffoon who is going to say things that anger 51% of voters every week coming up. It's going to be a bloodbath. He'll lose as bad as Goldwater did.
Some were even declaring that the nomination of a racist demagogue marked the end of America, a strange claim to make about a country that was an apartheid state for the first 200 or so years of its existence:
I dunno. I worry he'll pivot well. I already see a lot more "He didn't really mean anything he was saying" and "He's really a lot like Bernie" posts coming through my stream. It seems like he just has to basically say nothing and let people make up their own narratives about what he does/doesn't believe at this point.
The first thing he did after he won 5 states last Tuesday was say that Hillary would only be at 5% if she were a man!
And then last night he tweeted O'Reilly that he won Virginia, because O'Reilly mistakenly had a graphic saying he lost it. He is delusional and does not know how to pivot.
My mom is the type of republican voter that doesn't think about politics much, but votes every election for the republican because she's always been a republican.
Just Hillary Clinton as a candidate by herself presented the first time there was an opportunity to make her rethink her vote, and Donald Trump absolutely seals the deal. I doubt it'll transition to long term support or downballot swaps, but it's certainly something, and I'm sure there's plenty of people like that to make 2016 an easy win for democrats.
Even against Jeb or Rubio, Hillary would probably get a lot of voters that like her experience, don't see her saying anything controversial, and understandably want a first woman president. Trump only helps to add to that.