So... Apparently #DropOutHillary is now a thing.
Hillary went to Yale. Why are people calling her a drop out??? So confusing.
So... Apparently #DropOutHillary is now a thing.
Hillary went to Yale. Why are people calling her a drop out??? So confusing.
Twitter thinks Hillary should go to A HBCU instead of an establishment college.Hillary went to Yale. Why are people calling her a drop out??? So confusing.
It's worse than I could have imagined. These people are serious, for one. Worse, they're of the mindset that having a larger number of tweets with your hashtag over another means you've more popular and thus automatically right. That's some Gamergate logical bullshit. "We can't be wrong! We have 10 times more tweets than the other guys! There are 10 times more of us!" would be funny were there not people willing to fight to the death based on those numbers. Similar standards of measurement-- YouTube like/dislike ratios representing what people feel is the factual accuracy of a clip; one subreddit having more subscribers than another as an accurate representation of public opinion.So... Apparently #DropOutHillary is now a thing.
I'm disappointed in McCain. I've never been his biggest fan, but I expected him to have a bit more self respect rather than backing Trump.
Trump killed in in Arizona. Probably has to unless he wants to retire.I'm disappointed in McCain. I've never been his biggest fan, but I expected him to have a bit more self respect rather than backing Trump.
Hillary went to Yale. Why are people calling her a drop out??? So confusing.
Have another bet going this November. Some guy who loves Trump wanted to bet 50$ to a charity of my choice that Trump would win in November. This was after he went on a rant about how Hillary is a lying witch for playing the woman card and how her feminist agenda won't work with anyone. And said "I hate paying taxes that go to useless causes so that a feminist can get a degree in "gender studies".
So now when Hillary wins in November, this guy will be sending $50 to the Feminist Majority Foundation.
Perfection.gifHave another bet going this November. Some guy who loves Trump wanted to bet 50$ to a charity of my choice that Trump would win in November. This was after he went on a rant about how Hillary is a lying witch for playing the woman card and how her feminist agenda won't work with anyone. And said "I hate paying taxes that go to useless causes so that a feminist can get a degree in "gender studies".
So now when Hillary wins in November, this guy will be sending $50 to the Feminist Majority Foundation.
I'm sure that it will be like that for me many times too.Every so often over the last few days, it'll come over me again that "Donald freaking Trump is the GOP nominee ahahahaha" and then a moment of dread over "what if he wins" and then a quick "nah"
What if he winsEvery so often over the last few days, it'll come over me again that "Donald freaking Trump is the GOP nominee ahahahaha" and then a moment of dread over "what if he wins" and then a quick "nah"
I love that, unasked, the spokesman for both Bush, Sr. And Bush, Jr. announced they wouldn't be endorsing Trump.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/bush-41-43-plan-endorse-donald-trump/story?id=38887953
Trump shit all over the Bush family legacy, not just Jeb. They'd be crazier than McCain to support him.It'd be pretty funny if they did after what Trump did to Jeb though.
Still, it's good on them for having standards I suppose.
Shocking news. Trump won't self fund his GE campaign.
Shocking news. Trump won't self fund his GE campaign.
Shocking news. Trump won't self fund his GE campaign.
He has been stating for months that he likely would not do so in multiple media interviews. Not sure why this is a big story.
Yeah, another instance of naiveté on display..Won't stop people claiming that he wants to get money out of politics so Sanders supporters should vote for him though.
Trump shit all over the Bush family legacy, not just Jeb. They'd be crazier than McCain to support him.
Shocking news. Trump won't self fund his GE campaign.
I love that, unasked, the spokesman for both Bush, Sr. And Bush, Jr. announced they wouldn't be endorsing Trump.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/bush-41-43-plan-endorse-donald-trump/story?id=38887953
Bernie on NPR taking about how ineffective the Dems have been yada yada yada. I swear to fucking god ALL HE DOES IS ATTACK Hillary and the Dems. When is this guy going to actually start attacking the "bad" guys???
But but but the PARTYTrump shit all over the Bush family legacy, not just Jeb. They'd be crazier than McCain to support him.
The widespread discussion about the gender gap can obscure more than it illuminates. Since the 1980s, Democratic presidential candidates have consistently run better among women than among menor put the other way, Republicans have run better with men than women. This pattern has held among whites, African Americans and Hispanics.
But the magnitude of the gender gap is inflated by Democrats overwhelming advantage among women of color. President Obama, for instance won exactly 96 percent of African American women, and over two-thirds of Hispanic women, in each of his two victories. Democrats havent done nearly as well among white women. In modern exit polling tracing back to 1972, the only Democrat to win more white women than his Republican opponent was Bill Clinton in 1996. Clinton in 1992 and Al Gore in 2000 also ran about even with white women. But since then, the GOP has carried white women by solid margins: 11 points in 2004, seven in 2008, and fully 14 for Mitt Romney against Obama in 2012.
And people think Trump could winThat precedent frames the challenge facing Trump, now the inevitable GOP nominee. Following long-term trends, its likely that minorities will cast 30 percent of the 2016 vote, and white women will comprise slightly more of the remainder than white menjust as in 2012. In his absolute best-case scenario, Trump might match the two-thirds of white men that Reagan won in 1984, the partys modern apex. But given Trumps astronomical unfavorable ratings among African Americans and Hispanics, its not unreasonable to project that Clinton could hold the roughly 80 percent of minority voters who have typically backed Democratic nominees since 1976.
If both those projections held true, and the electorates composition followed the long-term patterns, Trump would then need to attract 58 percent of white women to reach a national majorityslightly more than the 56 percent that Romney won. Looking at the equation from the other direction, if Clinton matched the usual Democratic performance with non-white voters and also carried even half of white women, Trump would then need to win more than three-fourths of white men for a national majority, a daunting prospect.
I just had this strange feeling that somewhere, in an alternate universe where Trump didn't win, bizzaro-Joe is cursing the Democrats for choosing to throw away the presidency by electing such a poorly liked candidate as their nominee. I really like Hillary Clinton, but boy is she unpopular. Thank God she's facing Trump.
But...Hillary...corru...wh...
My Facebook wall is back to full on crazy. Last night on one discussion a Sanders voter questioned someone else who said something like 'Bernie wins when independants can vote, so he should be the nominiation' by saying 'wait, hasn't Hillary won more open primaries?'
He was told 'no'.
So I chimed in. Here's what happened.
If anyone is wondering why I think a percentage of Sanders supporters are maniacs, it's because of stuff like that.
This Persona stream is killing me.
The Republican Party's Woman Problem [The Atlantic]
And people think Trump could win
I find this line of reasoning strange. She has over 3m more votes than her competitor, more votes than any other primary candidate in either party, has a poll with a 13-pt lead in the general when she isn't even the nominee yet...
That's a very popular unpopular person
So Ryan, why DO YOU support a known fraud and a war criminal who is being investigated by the FBI!?!??!??!
What if he wins
Every step of the way we've dismissed him until it became very clear how wrong everyone was about him.
Unasked is damn amusing.
It's also ironic since Bush and his failure to start moving the party towards a sustainable future and his creation of the Iraq war on apparent false pretenses could be considered one of the primary reasons that Trump won the nomination.
This article goes into that idea.
Would Trump start in a extremely disadvantage because he did not raise a lot of money during the primary to use in the election and did not build GOTV teams across the states?
Have another bet going this November. Some guy who loves Trump wanted to bet 50$ to a charity of my choice that Trump would win in November. This was after he went on a rant about how Hillary is a lying witch for playing the woman card and how her feminist agenda won't work with anyone. And said "I hate paying taxes that go to useless causes so that a feminist can get a degree in "gender studies".
So now when Hillary wins in November, this guy will be sending $50 to the Feminist Majority Foundation.
There are a few things that I never will understand about the "Hillary is a right wing" shit liberals throw at her
1) Republicans absolutely hate her. If she was a secret Republican, why wouldn't they basically name her public enemy number 1/2 (Obama being #1 atm)
2) Wouldn't she try and hide her more pragmatic views from the public and try and be a fake Bernie who will give you everything you ask for, only to get into office and turn heel and do nothing she said? What's the point of offering pragmatic, realistic solutions when... that's exactly what you plan on doing?
Just basing it on her favorability ratings. She's definitely a beatable candidate. The GOP just decided they didn't feel like doing it.
I'm curious, has Hilary run a single attack ad against Sanders? I can't seem to recall one but maybe I'm forgetting some or missed them?