brainchild
Banned
We already talked about all this. Now we will get Mael to come here and ask if corruption is an 'american thing' again. The audit was to check if the machines are working correctly, he explains that in the video, not to check to precincts results. Why they couldn't do both? I guess bureaucracy.
So they take a sample and count votes by hand, put them in the machine and see if they get the same results. The trick is this: it doesn't need to match the tally of the night, just the one done in the audit. If the sample of machines is deemed working all right the audit passes. It seems that they then used the election night count on the report (which is wrong, but I'm not election expert) but this audit has no influence on the poll results. So they didn't 'add' votes.
As I said before on this topic I'm sure that there was even more errors in other precincts, and that you can recount any election 3 times and get different results every time.
I know it's a very long video (and boring) but he explains that the procedure to actually recount a precinct result is a different process that needs to be requested by a candidate and/or through a court order. None of which was done.
Mael please don't bite, I'm having a deja vu lol
Must've missed the last discussion. But yeah, you're right about the procedure.