shinra-bansho
Member
The VP pick isn't ultimately going to swing anything for the most part.
Succession planning.
Succession planning.
The VP pick isn't ultimately going to swing anything for the most part.
Succession planning.
Agreed. Strategically, she should probably pick a white guy from Virginia or Florida
I can see Warren being very effective bringing on Bernie supporters. But what about actual moderate Democrats, and left-leaning Independents who voted Bernie because he's not Hillary but could be swayed by a VP that appeals to them? I don't know what Hillary stands to gain by picking someone even further left than she is, other than potentially winning over Bernie's most fervent, which might not even be that big a group.
But progressives are already in the camp for the same reason. Someone that can run in 2024 is the most important thing.
Is this really vital? I'm coming around to believing shoehorning a nominee yields a less competitive nominee in the fall. The uncompetitive invisible primary this time around was really disheartening for primary morale.Someone that can run in 2024 is the most important thing.
The VP pick isn't ultimately going to swing anything for the most part.
Succession planning.
Is this really vital? I'm coming around to believing shoehorning a nominee yields a less competitive nominee in the fall. The uncompetitive invisible primary this time around was really disheartening for primary morale.
She needs a proven progressive on the ticket. Picking the VP due to age/ethnicity/demographic would be stupid because her opponent is Donald Trump, minorities are already in her camp.
Obama as a relatively green Senator with little foreign policy experience needed someone like Biden.
No one needs Elizabeth Forma as VP, the once and future progressive.
I'm drinking, but how about...Nina Turner?
She's currently not in office. She has progressive bonafides, obviously. She's not ancient. She's black.
Is this really vital? I'm coming around to believing shoehorning a nominee yields a less competitive nominee in the fall. The uncompetitive invisible primary this time around was really disheartening for primary morale.
The VP pick isn't ultimately going to swing anything for the most part.
Succession planning.
dude she has been campaigning for sanders
I literally just saw her like a week ago at the nyc rally. she is bae, btw
I can see Warren being very effective bringing on Bernie supporters. But what about actual moderate Democrats, and left-leaning Independents who voted Bernie because he's not Hillary but could be swayed by a VP that appeals to them? I don't know what Hillary stands to gain by picking someone even further left than she is, other than potentially winning over Bernie's most fervent, which might not even be that big a group.
I'm drinking, but how about...Nina Turner?
She's currently not in office. She has progressive bonafides, obviously. She's not ancient. She's black.
She needs to pick someone to help her with "working class whites".
I say she should pick like
Um
A republican
What about Tulsi Gabbard?
#wherestulsi
Not sure how prominent this line of thinking is, but it I'm reading a lot of comments in articles that involve her where Bernie supporters are almost on the verge of dropping her under simply because she hasn't endorsed Bernie yet.
I love the idea of a Warren VP but I'm wondering where loyalties will sway - will they thinks he sold out or will they truly support her should she be chosen? I think that by the time it matters, they'd unite for the General but with this kind of vitriol I'm seeing, I don't know how you go back from that.
Oh Tulsi's done. She spurned Debbie and broke off the chains of DNC. She's in Bernie's wagon and it's going to be surrounded soon.
She needs to pick someone to help her with "working class whites".
I say she should pick like
Um
A republican
Azealia Banks is trying (on Twitter) to explain to DeRay (who is gay) that "faggot" isn't a word that is offensive to gay people while yelling at DeRay.
Obama as a relatively green Senator with little foreign policy experience needed someone like Biden.
No one needs Elizabeth Forma as VP, the once and future progressive.
Nah - he ended up grabbing Clinton as SoS and calling it good. :-D
Personally I'm a fan of Tom Perez; but since we're talking about female VP picks, I think out of the options, and with assuming Trump or Cruz facing Clinton (and thus a race to the middle not particularly happening) - Warren might be the best option. Bring out the base when you have the demographic advantages. Voter turnout is a card that the Dems have the advantage on.
If Sanders can motivate his base to come out for Clinton outside of a VP pick; then you go elsewhere. I don't know if Gillebrand works; she might fall afoul of the "VP can't be from same state as President" rule. (Not sure where Clinton has her legal residence now a days).
I don't see many up and coming Dems, tbh. Worried about Castro being Rubio 2.0, and Booker being Christie 2.0 (see Newark, craptons of corruption)
[...] and she'll need someone with credibility to combat such.
Clinton really does have a white people problem
Yes white people continue to do America proud!Clinton really does have a white people problem
Entitled babies that feel like the world is being stolen from themWhite men are generally assholes, I say this as a white dude.
The Macho King bows to no queen.
Can somebody from Mass explain to me how they can be such a Dem stronghold but keep electing Republican Govs?
White people like Guy Fieri just in case you were thinking of listening to them
Primary morale has nothing to do with general election votes.