blackaroni
Member
Mess
Mess
Mess
How Bernie responds to defeat between now and the convention and where he shifts his rhetoric to will dictate whether he has a lasting impact on politics or ends up a tricky pub quiz question.
This senator ran opposite Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Democratic Party nomination:
A. Colonel Sanders
B. Bernie Sanders
C. Bernie Frank
D. Frank Sinatra
Ok, there is something in those taxes. I was hedging about it, but now I'm 100% certain. Why are they making it such a big issue is beyond my comprehension and the only thing that makes sense is there's something in them.Unlike precedent, Jane Sanders says they will not release any more tax returns prior to 2014, because Hillary won't release her private speaking transcripts, which is not precedent.
wut
Mess
Everyone knows Clinton is in the pocket of Big Nintendo.
I don't have a huge problem with Hillary, but she's not my favorite candidate. I don't really know where she stands or what she'll do, although I liked Bill in office. Hillary's been such a by-the-numbers politico that I'm not sure what ball she'll run with once she's in office.
K. Im ready for the exit poll melt downs.
Ok, there is something in those taxes. I was hedging about it, but now I'm 100% certain. Why are they making it such a big issue is beyond my comprehension and the only thing that makes sense is there's something in them.
K. Im ready for the exit poll melt downs.
Mess
Ok, there is something in those taxes. I was hedging about it, but now I'm 100% certain. Why are they making it such a big issue is beyond my comprehension and the only thing that makes sense is there's something in them.
Ok, there is something in those taxes. I was hedging about it, but now I'm 100% certain. Why are they making it such a big issue is beyond my comprehension and the only thing that makes sense is there's something in them.
Swear to god, if y'all mother fuckers panic over exit polls again tonight I will murder you.
Swear to god, if y'all mother fuckers panic over exit polls again tonight I will murder you.
But what? A weird charity? A tax haven?
I think people who are seriously alleging election fraud are beyond the realm of logical argument. It's worth a shot, but if they've become so invested in Bernie that they're willing to discount every unfavorable result and trump up small victories as indicative of massive support, poll numbers aren't going to change their minds.
Stop posting super old quotes. It's just weird. People change.
I'm more worried about the weather then exit polls at this point....
@benchmarkpol
Benchmark Politics Retweeted Jesse
29% turnout THIS EARLY at Paxton in Harrisburg! Dauphin County is a +22% Clinton county.
Jesse @JRBarrick87
We are @ 29% voter turnout as of 2 pm
I wonder how many will read the first line of this post and immediately feel their blood pressure go up, before realizing that it's a hypothetical.. 😋MD Exit Poll- Bernie: 53 / Hillary: 47
Meltdowns. Explosions. Parties in the streets
MD Results: Hillary: 63 / Bernie: 37
Accusations of fraud. "Where did the votes go" Someone getting fired. Mass delusion and hysteria
OH BOY
Other polls have asked Americans whether they prefer the past to the present. In March, Pew asked people whether life was better for people like them 50 years ago and a majority of Republicans answered yes. Trump supporters were the most emphatic, with 75 percent saying things were better in the mid-1960s.
Democrats, though, were less enthusiastic about the past. Forty-eight percent said life was better now than it was 50 years ago, while 17 percent of Democrats said it was the same, and only 28 percent said it was worse. Political science research suggests that Americans optimism can be influenced by whether their political party is in the White House. So its perhaps not surprising that Democrats feel better than Republicans about current circumstances.
Tricky to say weather or not it'll make any difference...
what does this mean?
what does this mean?
The Hillary voters are turning out in big numbers. I think.
Something stupid like a donation to an interesting group probably. I dont think they are hiding or saving unreported income or anything illegal like that.But what? A weird charity? A tax haven?
I'm sure he'll still talk about it because he has nothing else.This whole tax return thing was such a masterful squashing of the transcript issue that I can only sit back and marvel at how much it's deflated that talking point. Not that it was gaining traction before... but it's proven such an amazing counter punch.
what does this mean?
Well, Jane Sanders was a university president. Could be a golden parachute type thing.
I mean, I don't think there's anything in there but even Romney disclosed more than a year's worth of taxes. If you're disclosing less than Romney, well it's not a good look.
Nate throwing it down
Nate throwing it down
Hillary supporters turning out because they're mad at bernie = good sign for the fall?OH BOY
That university she worked for didn't have much of an endowment and had a lot of debt, so I doubt that it is anything huge.
This whole tax return thing was such a masterful squashing of the transcript issue that I can only sit back and marvel at how much it's deflated that talking point. Not that it was gaining traction before... but it's proven such an amazing counter punch.
That university she worked for didn't have much of an endowment and had a lot of debt, so I doubt that it is anything huge.
Why do you think the debt is so large?
#followtheberningtrail
Why do you think the debt is so large?
#followtheberningtrail
Grill described a closed and hostile environment, claiming that Sanders frequently yelled at staff and managed to eliminate anyone who voiced criticism. In the letter, Grill claims that many concerned voices were forced out by continual abuse and by eventually being offered humiliating and unfair contracts in which they were demoted below people who were, in many cases, less qualified for their positions.
In the last six years, about 40 people have left the school, Grill estimates, most (if not all) deeply disillusioned with the institution and its processes, most harboring bitterness and deep regret.
The one company that didnt settle with the FTC is LabMD. Daugherty hoped, at first, that if he were as cooperative as possible, the FTC would go away. He now calls that phase the stupid zone. LabMD mailed some 5,000 pages of documents to Washington. The FTC asked the company to reship everything by FedEx. In a follow-up phone call and letter, the commission dismissed LabMDs documentation as inadequate. The company sent more, and Daugherty and his lawyer flew up to Washington for a face-to-face meeting with two FTC lawyers that July. The agency requested still more information. LabMD sent another bundle of materials in August, this time trying to go beyond what the FTC had asked by including documentation going back to 2001. From Daughertys perspective, the FTC lawyers didnt seem to absorb or understand the details and documents they kept asking for; he began to wonder if the FTC was intentionally trying to bury LabMD under so many demands. (The FTC didnt respond to numerous e-mails and calls about its investigation of LabMD.)
http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-labmd-ftc-tiversa/The FTC filed a formal complaint against LabMD in August 2013 in its administrative court system, alleging not only that LabMD had allowed billing information for some 9,000 consumers to leak out of its computer network, but also that sensitive information for at least 500 more had wound up in the hands of identity thieves in Sacramento. The agency quickly ramped up the pressure on LabMD. The companys legal fees had mounted to a half-million dollars. In a three-hour period on Oct. 24, 2013, commission lawyers sent notice of 20 depositions to be taken in various parts of the country, initially all scheduled at the same time on the same day. They requested depositions from LabMDs employees, former employees, clients, and technology service providers, and the police in 11 states. LabMDs lawyers tried to get a protective order and stay the proceedings, arguing that these tactics seemed designed to wreck LabMDs business rather than discover relevant information.
LabMD was, in fact, crumbling under the strain. Revenue declined to $2.1 million in 2013, from $4.6 million in 2012, the year the fight with the FTC became public. Daughertys deputy quit that July. LabMDs insurers declined to renew the companys general liability, medical malpractice, and property policies. LabMDs employees grew increasingly restive and angry at Daugherty for his refusal to settle with the FTC.
The psychological warfare the FTC did on the company, the morale, the diversion, the fearthose employees blamed me, he says. Its like, Why dont you just settle with them? Why are you being so stubborn?  In January 2014 he shut the company down, jamming medical equipment into his garage, home office, and extra bedroom, where it remains today.
You know reading this article about the "hostile work environment" under Jane really puts some clarity to what we are seeing going on now with his campaign:
http://vtdigger.org/2011/09/27/jane...ncy-of-burlington-college-reaches-settlement/
Yet, signs of Mrs. Clinton’s strength in Pennsylvania were clear Tuesday morning. As Mr. Sanders crossed a street, a car full of Clinton supporters waved signs out of the windows shouting, “Hillary, Hillary.” Another man briskly walked past Mr. Sanders saying, “I’m voting for Hillary.”
There was a article out of the NYTimes, I believe, where they went to Vermont and interviewed a couple of Bernie's old opponents in his various races and found what he's been doing against Clinton--painting her as corrupt and so on--is something he liked to do up there as well.
In the years that followed, more than $1 million in confirmed donations listed by Sanders in loan documents never materialized, as previously reported by VTDigger.
When the diocese settled a loan with the college last year, the church lost as much as $2 million, according to financial statements from the diocese obtained by VTDigger.
Burlington College could not afford the new campus, and nearly went bankrupt before selling much of the land to developer Eric Farrell last year. Farrell recently inked a development deal with the city to build housing on a portion of the land.