Vaughn Hillyard
‏@VaughnHillyard
Biden took Aspen stage with Walter Isaacson. Isaacson barely got a word before Biden pointed to Gingrich, said, in part: "It's a hell of job!"
Edward Mejia Davis
‏@TeddyDavisCNN
Biden to Trump VP prospect Gingrich at Aspen: "Newt, are you doing to do it?"
Gingrich: "Should I?"
Biden "I think he needs the help, yes"
Big Ag spent hundreds of millions on lobbying and campaign contributions to stop GMO labeling laws. We cant let them get away with it.
Food companies believe they have a right to unlimited profits, but they don't think people have a right to know what's in the food they eat.
The anti-GMO bill in the Senate is confusing, misleading and unenforceable. We must have higher standards than that for federal legislation.
The Stabenow-Roberts anti-GMO bill contains huge loopholes in the labeling requirement. Theres not even a penalty for violating it.
I am proud that Vermont is first state to mandate GMO labeling. What Im not proud of is the Senate bill trying to destroy this progress.
Sen. Roberts' GMO bill imposes no penalties whatsoever for violating the labeling requirement, making the law essentially meaningless.
The GMO legislation in Congress would create a confusing, misleading and unenforceable national standard for labeling GMOs. It cannot pass.
Big agriculture companies like Monsanto do not believe people have a right to know what's in the food they eat.
It's not complicated. People want to know the quality of the food they're eating and what they're giving to their kids. #JustLabelIt
ftfy1) fuck Bernie
Well, ok, let's be honest, here. The Palestinians are an invented people. They are Arabs who live in a specific region that has mistreated them since 1948 but they are not really a distinct "people".Trump could balance it out by picking Newt "the palestinians are an invented people" Gingrich, and they could get their talking points From Time Immemorial, which was praised by Wiesel.
Well, ok, let's be honest, here. The Palestinians are an invented people. They are Arabs who live in a specific region that has mistreated them since 1948 but they are not really a distinct "people".
Not sure what you're saying, here. If India was as arbitrarily carved up as the Middle East was post Sykes-Picot, they wouldn't be as strong or as stable as they are.So, Indians.
Not sure what you're saying, here. If India was as arbitrarily carved up as the Middle East was post Sykes-Picot, they wouldn't be as strong or as stable as they are.
Bright Orange?Wait did Biden say Trump is "bright"?
...the fuck?
2-3 hours before the doors open. Bring water, but not in a bottle you like because you'll need to throw it out before entering.I RSVP'd with Obama and Clinton's event this Tuesday in Charlotte. Has anyone here ever been to a similar event? How early should I arrive? The event starts at 1 pm.
Damn..I can understand how you might find it surprising that there are two Mets fans.
Then, no, the exact OPPOSITE of native Americans. Native Americans are almost all distinct people who had their land raped from them and their people killed in the single worst genocide in human history. I sometimes wish King Phillip had succeeded in fighting off the English settlers and delaying English imperialism by a hundred years or so.I think he means native Americans.
Honestly, though. Bernie Sanders was worth it if for no other reason than to give us the Larry David Bernie Sanders character.
"BernieSanders.com. Check it out! It's a MESS!"
2-3 hours before the doors open. Bring water, but not in a bottle you like because you'll need to throw it out before entering.
Seeing Hillary in person was so different than seeing her in video. It was surreal. I can only imagine what seeing Obama will be like.Thank you, good to know. This is my first time seeing the president, and possible future president, in person. I'm really excited!
Y'all want a Gravis Poll of Bullshit?
Queen 50
Small, Handed Orange One 50
If it's Obama too, I'd get there even earlier. Like 4 maybe.2-3 hours before the doors open. Bring water, but not in a bottle you like because you'll need to throw it out before entering.
The fuck is this?Y'all want a Gravis Poll of Bullshit?
Queen 50
Small, Handed Orange One 50
Or
Queen 50
Small Handed Orange One 46
Not-Queen-or-Small Handed Orange one 4
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2016/Gravis_National_June_27_to_28_2016.pdf
There's the release, so you can see none of the demographics. And 100% of people have made up their mind. Seems legit.
We've gotten like 3 polls in a row that have close margins and CNN came out with a +5 last week when the last one they had was a +11. Why can't you all just accept that the race tightened?
We've gotten like 3 polls in a row that have close margins and CNN came out with a +5 last week when the last one they had was a +11. Why can't you all just accept that the race tightened?
Uh, no: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...s/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.htmlBecause we have other polls that are from good sources having the gap still be 7+
Uh, no: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...s/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
Everything but Reuters is around 5, and Reuters is a BAD pollster.
ABC was a while ago and also qualifies as an outlier. But if that outlier counts, why doesn't the Rasmussen count? You can't choose your outliers, you have to just accept all of the data and believe in large numbers. Huffpost is recording about +6 right now. I'd put it closer to +4.5. My prediction is about 3-4 point spread after the convention.ABC poll was 12+, and most others are around four to five points (ok so not 7+)
ABC was a while ago and also qualifies as an outlier. But if that outlier counts, why doesn't the Rasmussen count? You can't choose your outliers, you have to just accept all of the data and believe in large numbers. Huffpost is recording about +6 right now. I'd put it closer to +4.5. My prediction is about 3-4 point spread after the convention.
H. A. Goodman ‏@HAGOODMANAUTHOR
If "sources close to" DOJ or FBI knew everything, America wouldn't need the DOJ or FBI. Years of group think about to end. BERNIE WILL WIN!!
Are you familiar with the book?Well, ok, let's be honest, here. The Palestinians are an invented people. They are Arabs who live in a specific region that has mistreated them since 1948 but they are not really a distinct "people".
Ok, this is all true, but I really want it to be a deadbeat. Why can't you give me my dead heat?I guess for the same reasons you can decide that it's +4.5 based on whatever it is that led you to make that decision?
Also, the Ipsos poll is ranked A- by 538. So....ya.
Edit: I'd also encourage you to not use Realclearpolitics. They randomly exclude polls.
What book?Are you familiar with the book?
Ok, this is all true, but I really want it to be a deadbeat. Why can't you give me my dead heat?
What book?
Someone needs to tell HA Goodman that some people have real problems
Then again maybe he does have a problem
He either has some mental issues or is acting. No one could logically say the things he does.
Ok, this is all true, but I really want it to be a deadbeat. Why can't you give me my dead heat?
What book?
Gingrich and his fellow Republicans have sensed a potential softening in the Jewish vote. In 2008, only African-Americans were more solidly behind Barack Obama, who, according to exit polls, won seventy-eight per cent of the Jewish vote. But the Republicans are hoping to woo at least the more conservative sector of Jewish Americansthose who feel that Obama has been too hard on Benjamin Netanyahu. And, because Gingrich has a little learning and a darkly sophisticated memory for intellectual battle, he catered to his cause by employing the word invented. In this context, the word summons a 1984 bestseller that was once totemic on the Jewish right (and still is, for some): From Time Immemorial: The Origins of the Arab-Jewish Conflict Over Palestine, by Joan Peters.
Peters, who was not a historian, put forward a purportedly scholarly construction based on the notion, as Golda Meir famously put it, that there is no such thing as a Palestinian people. The book, which is an ideological tract disguised as history, made the demographic argument that most people who call themselves Palestinians have short roots in the territory and are Arabs who came from elsewhere. It suggests that the territory that is now Israel was all but uninhabited before the Zionist movement began. It was a book that implicitly made the argument that Palestine was a tabula rasa waiting for its Jewish revival; or, as the old slogan had it: a land without a people for a people without a land.
The book was not only a commercial success; it also won plaudits from Saul Bellow, Barbara Tuchman, Martin Peretz, Theodore H. White, Lucy Dawidowicz, Arthur Goldberg, and Elie Wiesel. For a time, it was wielded as a means to dismiss Palestinian claims on the land, and a means to be dismissive of Palestinians entirely. The book was thoroughly discredited by an Israeli historian, Yehoshua Porath, and many others who dismantled its pseudo-scholarship. Even some right-wing critics, like Daniel Pipes, who initially reviewed the book positively, later admitted that Peterss work was shoddy and ignores inconvenient facts.
Bernie is going to win what? He already lost the popular vote and the delegate count.
How many supers has he flipped lately?
INDICTMENT IS COMING
It's our new meme.
Bad news for Kay Hagan.
Fraud!!!
Hillary indictment incoming.
Our new title should be: Fraud Hagan alert: Kay's indictment of Clinton's fraudulent emails incoming.
I do wonder what he's going to do when it comes out there will be no indictment. I find it hard to believe he will just stop. He must have another magical path to victory for Bernie.