User 463088
Banned
Human? lol
Guns are people too my friend.
Human? lol
Doing irrelevant political theater in the name of restricting people's human and constitutionally protected rights?
Lmao at the Diablosing over Murphy. You guys act like you've never seen Florida politics before. Remember when Rubio lied about the expenses on his government expense card and how it did jack shit to him? Murphy will have a rough patch, but the Florida race will be about the top of the ticket, take it to the bank.
And stop Diablosing.
Guns are people too my friend.
I love you Benji but they're not human rights. You don't have a god given right to a murder machineDoing irrelevant political theater in the name of restricting people's human and constitutionally protected rights?
The old Florida modifier. Like if you go on a blind date in Florida, you shouldn't be surprised if your date offers you bath salts. In other states it would be gum.
.Lmao at the Diablosing over Murphy. You guys act like you've never seen Florida politics before. Remember when Rubio lied about the expenses on his government expense card and how it did jack shit to him? Murphy will have a rough patch, but the Florida race will be about the top of the ticket, take it to the bank.
And stop Diablosing.
.
I eye rolled at the whole thing. Rubios comments about hating the Senate and his shit record will move more voters then the fact he isn't an accountant.
I cant think of any reason why someone would be against this.Yeah, honestly, I'm not super into this whole sit in. I dunno.
Doing irrelevant political theater in the name of restricting people's human and constitutionally protected rights?
Indeed.
I'm not a Floridian, but their politics is scummy from top to bottom.
And might I just say:
This is why the Democratic Party matters.
This is why being a member of the Democratic Party matters.
This is why a Democratic Congress matters.
Edit: Kathy Griffin RT Elizabeth Warren=gaygasm. YASSS QUEENS
the sit in is kinda stupid.....
Gary Johnson just said Americans have to suck it up and raised the retirement age.
Jesus Christ
They wanted a vote so they could "express themselves"
Doing irrelevant political theater in the name of restricting people's human and constitutionally protected rights?
Gary Johnson just said Americans have to suck it up and raised the retirement age.
Jesus Christ
Don't ask Ted Cruz and Rand Paul about it.So irrelevant that it's getting a bunch of attention.
shhhh youIsn't that just called government?
Working until you die is the American way!
A moment from the House floor, from @LukeRussert
Now I want donuts..
Americans are broadly in favor of the most basic types of gun controls like background checks and ammunition magazine limitations, but the House GOP refuses to hold votes on even something as basic as terror watch list checks. They're proving a point, and given the media coverage of it it's working well. I've seen and heard as many people talk about this today than Trump's speech.the sit in is kinda stupid.....
https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidn...rorism-watch-l?utm_term=.hlbb1Zrae#.rjvjyLJbNWASHINGTON — As Democrats on Capitol Hill staged a sit-in in the House chamber seeking a vote on gun policy measures, the ACLU sent a letter to senators opposing the latest compromise measure being considered.
The measure — proposed by Republican Sen. Susan Collins and backed by the Democrats’ leader in that chamber, Sen. Harry Reid — is a more narrow version of the “terrorism watchlist” gun ban measure proposed by Sen. Dianne Feinstein that was rejected earlier in the week.
Collins’ measure utilizes the No-Fly List and the Selectee List as the basis for restricting gun purchases — which would include a far narrower group of individuals than the broad terrorism watchlist used in Feinstein’s original proposal — but that change was not enough to lead the ACLU to support the measure.
“The ACLU strongly urges you to vote against the Collins Amendment because it uses the error-prone and unfair watchlist system, along with vague and overbroad terms, as a predicate for a proceeding to deny a firearms permit,” the ACLU officials wrote in the letter. “The Collins Amendment relies on both the No Fly List, by codifying its criteria, and the Selectee List, by direct reference.”
If people live longer they should work longer, otherwise the Social Security arithmetic doesn't work out.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidn...rorism-watch-l?utm_term=.hlbb1Zrae#.rjvjyLJbN
I'm with the ACLU. This compromise bill sucks. Do a sit in for a better bill, thanks.
He was punished with 11 months of losing to and being insulted by Donald Trump.This almost tops Ted Cruz's defund Obamacare speech.
I appreciate the sit-in; the bill is complete horse shit unless they put actual oversight on the actual fucking list.
Agreed, but the point of this one is just to make the GOP look bad. They won't move on it so the Dems can just beat them over the head with something that sounds perfectly fine and reasonable.
Dave Wasserman ‏@Redistrict 22m22 minutes ago
House D's aren't going to convince R's to hold a vote. Rather, they'd need to convince their own voters to migrate to GOP-held districts.
.Dave Wasserman ‏@Redistrict 7m7 minutes ago
The great governance challenge of this era is to break up DC's partisanship-industrial complex. No easy ways to achieve that.
Dave Wasserman ‏@Redistrict 25s25 seconds ago
In 2014, only 14.6% of eligible voters participated in congressional primaries that were tantamount to election in >90% of districts.
Dave Wasserman ‏@Redistrict 2m2 minutes ago
Unless that changes, the political fringes will continue to paralyze Congress & everyone else will be left out in the cold.
He was punished with 11 months of losing to and being insulted by Donald Trump.
He's served his time. He should be able to vote again.
Yeah. For all the "sky is falling" talk by gun nuts, it's not like I'm the dictator and all guns are now banned (which I would def do). We just want some regulations, like no terror suspects buying guns and full background checks.
This sounds hilariously like something Biden would probably do. He probably actually does this at important meetings with foreign dignitaries.
He always has a Box O'Joe ready to go.
looks like the actual Clinton docs are now out: https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/4p57go/hacker_releases_clinton_foundation_documents/
Does this NOT point back to collusion/collaboration?
The last 'supposedly' leaked documents I posted spoke of how the DNC was using the media to muddy the waters around HRC ethics. Isn't it a bit curious that none of the mainstream media, with the exception of Fox (which will illicit an eye-roll, I completely understand), is reporting on these leaks, basically saying before Hillary was even a candidate, she was a front-runner? The Young Turks have spoken on it.
What about the California Elections? Why is it seeming more and more that any other candidate, let alone Bernie Sanders, never stood a chance?
This is making the rounds; it isn't just isolated to liberal news outlets, yet the DNC, Hillary's campaign, no one is speaking out to even denounce it. That doesn't scare the shit out of anyone else, even if she is your candidate of choice? Its almost like your vote doesn't count, and no one is denying it.
But what about those first five months though.
They were magical.
This "don't listen to the polls!!!!1!" bullshit is exactly how no one in the media saw Trump coming. PPP kept coming up with these insane results about how many Republicans thought that Islam was evil and that Obama was a Muslim and that the Confederacy should have won the war and centrist people kept yelling that these were "troll polls."
And then Trump comes along and has nothing but white nationalism and crushes a field of 16 competitors that fully represents the GOP's intellectual qualities. And Trump dominates despite the fact that Trump will probably start a nuclear war with China and is clearly not religious or not prepared to be president.
The interpretation is not flawed. Pretty much every scholar I'm aware of who has looked at the language, looked at what the framers said about it, looked at legal decisions since then, looked at similar amendments and laws from the time, etc. has concluded that it says that individual gun ownership needs to be a constitutional right in order to allow functioning ("well-regulated") militias to form and provide necessary defense. The amendment says individual people need to be able to own guns, period.
Whether we should still have the amendment is a matter for debate, but the actions of our government being fundamentally limited by the interpretive boundaries of the Constitution (which are flexible, but not infinite) is one of the cornerstones of the political legitimacy of the American government in the national psyche. And, sociologically speaking, legitimacy is a pretty important thing.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidn...rorism-watch-l?utm_term=.hlbb1Zrae#.rjvjyLJbN
I'm with the ACLU. This compromise bill sucks. Do a sit in for a better bill, thanks.
Does this NOT point back to collusion/collaboration?
The interpretation is not flawed. Pretty much every scholar I'm aware of who has looked at the language, looked at what the framers said about it, looked at legal decisions since then, looked at similar amendments and laws from the time, etc. has concluded that it says that individual gun ownership needs to be a constitutional right in order to allow functioning ("well-regulated") militias to form and provide necessary defense. The amendment says individual people need to be able to own guns, period.
Whether we should still have the amendment is a matter for debate, but the actions of our government being fundamentally limited by the interpretive boundaries of the Constitution (which are flexible, but not infinite) is one of the cornerstones of the political legitimacy of the American government in the national psyche. And, sociologically speaking, legitimacy is a pretty important thing.
Edit: Eh, I guess the Gun reform sit-in and Libertarian meeting or whatever are more important than something like this. Nothing to see here.