I don't see why.
I would also take issue with the phrasing of "arming yourself against the police." The point is that you have the constitutional right to bear arms. You don't need a specific target or justification.
The interpretation of the law, right now, is certainly the way you describe it.
The 2nd Amendment was a mistake. People do not have a right to self-defense with firearms. This right does not exist in Europe except in Switzerland and maybe France.
Sporting and hunting should be done with rented, on-site weapons.
I want complete and total disarmament of non-security personnel in this country within my lifetime. If we lived in a country where guns had never been a right, do you think people would be vigorously advocating for the legalization of these weapons for "self-defense"?
I like the history of the Black Panthers and I can't help but feel satisfied when I hear about how Fred Thompson made people afraid just because black men were understanding their rights and mobilizing. But then I think about the ramifications of mass arming and I don't feel smug about it anymore. When I think about armed civilians, I don't think of law abiding do-gooders defending themselves from bad cops and evil men, I think of Waco, Bundy Ranch, MOVE bombing...
Besides, guns are for killing. Are you telling me men should be able to kill a cop in the case of improper use of power? Or in self defense? That's certainly what I'm extrapolating from your defense of defense. It doesn't matter how right someone is, because as soon as shots are fired on police, your life is over.