Only of his basic income proposal. Which, while on the right-leaning end, is actually pretty shit: he talks full gutting of
all services, IIRC. Guess he got that wrong, too. I mean, consider how of his annual $13,000 basic income proposal, $3,000 is automatically linked to health care. Something tells me he wants to go back to a wild west system if part of the program is essentially a Health Savings Account, which I consider barbaristic...
But reading up on him and his views to this topic, I'm a bit lost. I mean, this isn't rocket science; we know the brain is negatively impacted by poverty, and has every right to be rightly classified as a disease. Going back to my earlier post, what country seems to be rampant in poverty? But it's just too easy to say "genes!" and confuse inferences with innate natures. It's no different than "Survival of the Fittest" arguments used to justify social status quos and those at the bottom. You justify a situation and say "that's just what is", and in a perverted sense,
look to continue that narrative.
What it is amounts to being a quick scapegoat to continue mankind's egoic conquest to put hierarchies of worthiness in the differentiation of things. People can get quickly got up in that bullshit, if my experiences today are of any anecdotal evidence. One should always question "less than
what" when looking at things in an inferior way. It's almost entirely based on thoughts, and the deeper you go, the more you see the flimsiness of it being absolute or objective.
Sorry if my post was too serious to your question, but I felt it warranted some degree of sincerity.
