ItWasMeantToBe19
Banned
Tim Tebow promoting white nationalists seems obvious in retrospect, but I never predicted it.
LOL Cenk literally ends the video with we warned you, this is your fault, not ours.
Nevermind their dishonest coverage of Clinton throughout the primary.
The entire segment was just another we told you so
If the Republicans can reform themselves into neoliberals-who-aren't-racist by 2024, they could certainly beat whoever the Democrats throw forward.
Did Donald Trump violate IRS rules, by using a charity's money to buy himself a signed football helmet?
Four years ago, at a charity fundraiser in Palm Beach, Donald Trump got into a bidding war at the evening's live auction. The items up for sale: A Denver Broncos helmet, autographed by then-star quarterback Tim Tebow, and a Tebow jersey.
Trump won, eventually, with a bid of $12,000. Afterward, he posed with the helmet. His purchase made gossip-column news: a flourish of generosity, by a mogul with money to burn. "The Donald giveth, and The Donald payeth," wrote the Palm Beach Daily News. "Blessed be the name of The Donald."
But Trump didn't actually pay with his own money.
Instead, the Susan G. Komen organization the breast-cancer nonprofit that hosted the party got a $12,000 payment from another nonprofit , the Donald J. Trump Foundation.
Trump himself sent no money. (In fact, a Komen spokeswoman said, Trump has never given a personal gift of cash to the Komen organization.) He paid the bill with money from a charity he founded in 1987, but which is largely stocked with other people's money. Trump is the foundation's president. But, at the time of the auction, Trump had given none of his own money to the foundation for three years running.
I don't recognize the title reference???
Also, were there any instances of Scalia doing anything similar to Ginsburg?
Yeah, I'm sorry for what happened to his son, but I'm pretty sure I'm going to hear a whole lot of generalizing about us being violent criminals. Yep. Expected.There are a few African-Americans, like Jamiel Shaw Sr., who became an outspoken advocate for tougher immigration laws after his son was killed in 2008 by an undocumented immigrant;
Privately, Trumps closest advisers are eager to sway him. Kushner, the millionaire real estate developer who has emerged as a de facto campaign manager in recent weeks, is said to strongly oppose putting Christie on the ticket. Notably, Christie was the federal prosecutor who put Kushner's father in prison a decade ago.
Cenk is an idiot for losing his shit over a Quinnipiac poll and completely ignoring just about every other poll out there.
See, this is what really gets me. Right wing parties dominate the Anglosphere when they don't go full retard with social conservatism or authoritarianism. Economic liberalism in the classical sense is very attractive to the Western public, for whatever reason. It's not really surprising that more socially liberal PMs like John Key, Turnbull and even Cameron (compared to the current lot) do better than the Tony Abbots or Steven "C51" Harpers.
A big, fat mess.Let's just examine this situation for a minute here: Trump's son-in-law has squeezed out one of Putin's goons (who somehow gets outmaneuvered constantly and really sends a bad sign about Putin's competence) to become Trump's campaign manager and now Trump's son-in-law is advising against Christie because Christie put Trump's son-in-law's father in prison.
This is just ridiculous.
Why do you think he's "waiting till marriage".Oh, had no idea he's gay.
Speaker list is coming together but not yet official
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/14/us/politics/republican-convention-speakers-donald-trump.html
Ah, I see now.Why do you think he's "waiting till marriage".
Nerd stuff and religion are the two easiest disguises.
I watched a TYT video where Cenk discussed a bit of what Ezra Klein said about one of Hillary's answers to his questions in his interview with her (the one where she discussed how Republicans are her enemies). The first minute was calm, if not a little extra, but then he went full on foam at the mouth for the next 4-5 minutes, and it was like... whoa. Calm down.
More than a dozen prominent progressive organizations, Democratic officeholders, and top liberal operatives are demanding that the Democratic National Committee's Rules Committee remake the superdelegate system when the panel meets just before the convention in Philadelphia at the end of the month.
The argument, made in a letter to the DNC, convention delegates, and the DNC's Platform Rules Committee, is that the superdelegate process as it stands "undermines representative democracy and means that the electorate is not necessarily decisive in determining who will be the Democratic nominees for president and vice president."
"We urge members of the Rules Committee to introduce, demand a vote on, and support language to such an effect and if needed, issue a minority report in support of such measures to be taken to the floor of the convention. We encourage all delegates who believe that the will of the electorate should reign supreme to support these efforts," reads the letter, which was first obtained by POLITICO. It is signed by liberal advocacy groups MoveOn.org, Democracy for America, and the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, as well as the center-left NDN think tank, among others.
The signers want to keep the total number of delegates the same but convert the existing superdelegates to regular delegates.
...
Sanders, who lagged far behind Clinton in superdelegates during the primary, wrote in an email to supporters Tuesday that he plans to still focus on moving the party to the left through the Rules Committee deliberations at the convention.
"We still have a tremendous amount of work left to do in the Democratic Rules Committee that will be meeting in the coming weeks," Sanders wrote in the email. "We have to enact the kinds of reforms to the Democratic Party and to the electoral process that will provide us the tools to elect progressive candidates, to allow new voices and new energy into the Party, and to break up the excessive power that the economic and political elites in the Party currently have. As with our fights on the platform committee, that will only be possible if we stand together."
The Rules Committee is set to hold a meeting ahead of the convention on July 23.
I think part of him would be ok if Trump won just so he could be right and blame the establishment and whatever.
Politico: Liberals gear up for DNC superdelegate fight
I wonder if the Rules Committee will actually make any changes to the delegate system (I doubt they'll give these people exactly what they're asking for, if they change anything at all).
Despite the fact that he said he would vote for Hillary despite living in California? Yeah, you got him.
Politico: Liberals gear up for DNC superdelegate fight
I wonder if the Rules Committee will actually make any changes to the delegate system (I doubt they'll give these people exactly what they're asking for, if they change anything at all).
Ohio black voters:
Trump, 0%
Clinton, 88%
Pennsylvania black voters:
Trump, 0%
Clinton, 91%
In a private speech recorded in February, the onetime Speaker of the U.S. House, now reportedly on the shortlist to be Trump’s running mate, said Trump would lose in a landslide if he didn’t evolve to be more like Ronald Reagan than Barry Goldwater. He added that no one knows what a Trump presidency would be like — not even Trump.
Newt Gingrich, a leading candidate to be Donald Trump’s running mate, told Republicans at a closed-door meeting earlier this year that Trump is not a conservative, speaks to voters “at the lowest level of any candidate in either party,” and could lose in a landslide if he didn’t significantly change his approach to campaigning.
Gingrich suggested Trump’s move from campaigning to governing would be challenging: “How we make the transition from, you know, language for fourth graders to real policy, I don’t know.”
In the February speech, Gingrich said he had no idea what kind of president Trump might be. “I do not believe anybody including Trump can tell you what a Trump presidency would be like,” Gingrich said.
Gingrich spoke for just over half an hour to the Republican group’s Feb. 29 meeting in Washington, devoting about 10 minutes to Trump. His comments were a mix of pointed criticism and awe at Trump’s political skills. He likened Trump’s approach to “some weird combination of the Kardashians” soliciting hearty laughs from the audience. “I mean think about it, the whole tweeting, the whole continuous noise.
At one point, Gingrich suggested he was shocked to hear of a highly educated supporter of Trump’s. “I had a very sophisticated medical doctor in Des Moines write me two days ago and say he sent a thousand dollar check to Trump. And I wrote back and said what are you doing?” Gingrich said to laughs. “He said I have finally concluded that we have to kick over the table in Washington.”
Gingrich also agreed with what many Republicans during the primary process feared: “National Review’s right. Donald Trump’s not a conservative.” Instead, Gingrich characterized him as “an American nationalist” who uses a deliberately unpredictable mix of hostility against “stupidity,” liberals and political correctness.
Are you suggesting that Duff is a pure and sufficiently refined substance to burn? Because I refuse to believe that, unless it's been rubbing alcohol all along. Would explain why the Flaming Moe combusted.
here's hoping philly stays peaceful
This is why I laugh whenever I hear about the US being a "post-racial country".
OH
MY
GOD
A whole night on infidelities!
OH
MY
GOD
A whole night on infidelities!
Newest round of laughably stupid shit I have to consistently disprove to acquaintances...
That really is pretty special.
Stop it. You dumbasses don't even know what you're trying to do. Bernie lost and it had absolutely fuck all to do with superdelegates. Stop trying to fix things that aren't broken.Politico: Liberals gear up for DNC superdelegate fight
I wonder if the Rules Committee will actually make any changes to the delegate system (I doubt they'll give these people exactly what they're asking for, if they change anything at all).
I'm laughing at the fact he's polling at 0% with blacks in two states. Has any presidential candidate polled that bad with blacks before?I don't think he will end up up with 0% of the black vote in those states on election night.
The RNC will be a big fat mess. Trump's probably not going to get a decent polling bump at all if that is the stuff he focuses on at the RNC.
Just saw this pop up on my Facebook wall.
I can't with the delusion.
H. A. Goodman ‏@HAGOODMANAUTHOR 33m33 minutes ago
#Jill2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WuA_zHZGJ8 Donald Trump is Crushing Hillary Clinton in Polls. Vote Jill Stein and Remain Bernie or Bust.
He is now?
Tiffany Trump
Donald Trump is Crushing Hillary Clinton in Polls. Vote Jill Stein
Worked for Kasich! Didn't bother dropping out until after Cruz did, which I'm sure the literally hundreds of people who voted for him feel better about the strength of their candidate. And think of those countless sandwiches he was able to experience!Yeah, vote for the person that's fourth in a 2-way race.
It was always, always #NeverHillary, and anyone who claimed otherwise was fooling you.Doesn't "Bernie or Bust" mean that you either support Bernie or not support anyone at all?
Um...wait....
Like if the final list is Christie, Gingrich, and Pence, how could it NOT be pence? I don't like any of them but that's like picking between shit, asshair, and a block of cheese. How is this even a consideration? If Pence would say yes, and I guess that could be the holdup but I doubt it, why would they not pick him?
And you doubted me.