Wait are you holding that quote up as a positive thing? That is a pretty troubling quote.
Personally, I would rather not have my "child" periodically cured by tanks and attack chopper strafing runs.
Look up all of the governments that have been overturned and look up the governments set up by the military. Then ask yourself which one you'd prefer.
What wow? There is nothing remotely questionable about what I wrote.
That's, like, your opinion, dude.
Your argument against democracy in favor of coup in Pakistan is to say they almost went to nuclear war with India is laughably bad! I mean, US almost nuked Russia too!
No, the situation between India and Pakistan was horrendously worse. They are not comparable. And besides, while I'm not in favor of a coup in this scenario, I think Reagan's escalation of the cold war was a mistake.
Not only that, but he opened the floodgates to saudi donations for madrassas, Islamicized textbooks, and instituted harsher laws. Everyone in the region fucking knows this!
Wow, lol. Okay, you're all over the place now. Recap:
- You made the claim that military coups cause resentment in the region and accelerate Islamization
- There have actually been several military coups in Pakistan. So, since we're talking about secular coups leading to resentment and radicalization, I presumed you to mean the 1999 military coup which forced Prime Minister Nawaz Shariff to resign, which then led to a resistance force led by al Qaeda to launch terrorist attacks in the country (that continue to this day). This really does fit your narrative.
- But noooooope. You're talking about a much older coup where a national socialist government was overthrown by conservative Islamists and led to the Islamization of Pakistani society
- So that leads me to say... Huh?! You're trying to make a point that coups cause resentment but all I see is an example of the military coup being the ones to cause the Islamization in general! So what are you even trying to say?
Even more egregious is your Iranian history. Like seriously guy. Revolution's direct catalyst was wholesale import of Western culture by Shah and tattered economy. The Students from the revolution even cite this!
You need a dictionary. The chain of events over 20 years was overthrow of elected leader -> rejection of nationalization of oil -> a booming economy -> concurrent import of western culture because Shah is a western puppet -> ISRAEL STUFF -> crackdown on dissent -> authoritarianism -> economy goes way south -> revolution. Yes, there had been long-standing resentment in Iran, but the spark of revolution was the economy and the crackdown on opposition, not western culture and the overthrow.
LOL@supporting Cici. Duder killed how many protestors and jailed how many dissidents again?
1,500 killed and like 10k jailed, I think. Now you tell me, how many people died in Syria because there isn't a stable government and the US didn't support a side? 300k now? If Cici was so bad why would Obama support him, also? Do you think Morsi would have been better? Do you realize that Morsi was also protested against? Morsi was going to be a complete repeat of Shiraff in Pakistan so thankfully it didn't happen.
Of course, you support a maniacal tyrant Dueterte so what can anyone expect.
I don't support him anymore, I just recognize he's a better choice than Roxas.
You oppose anything and everything that's remotely Islamic so of course you'd say this. In democracies laws can be re written or thrown out. Indiana governor just signed LGBTQ discrimination law into his state, doesn't mean the US should invade Indiana. It depends on people, it always does! If Turkish people want a stable country with a religious Democratically elected President/PM, who the fuck are you to tell them how their democracy should look like? Not every country is going to be a swiss Democracy! This aversion to any religious leader being democratically elected in Middle East being instantly shut out is ridiculous!
Because Islamism is bad. Period. That's really just it. You keep saying that Erdogan has a mandate of democracy and deserves his power and it doesn't matter because he can be voted out but that's not true because he is changing the country to become anti-democratic. So the only democratic option is actually to... Throw out Erdogan. By force. It's simple.
The comparisons to Indiana are bad because the federal government is going to declare the law unconstitutional anyway. And we're going to overrule Indiana's democracy just like we did in California. And North Carolina. And it'll just keep happening that way.
Do you know why? It's because the federal government has the power. Power wins.